The Quick Switch...
It seems Tamil Nadu chief minister J. Jayalalitha has now chosen to make the Koodankulam Nuclear Power Plant (KKNPP) a handle to beat the Centre with. As the Centre squirms over the agitation in Idinthakarai, Tirunelveli district, against setting up the nuclear plant, Jayalalitha has done nothing to ease things. The antipathy has only grown over the Centre not clearing the Rs 2.5 lakh-crore Tamil Nadu has sought for clearing its financial mess. At the National Development Council meeting on October 23, Tamil Nadu finance minister O. Paneerselvam read out the chief minister’s speech in which she said the Centre was treating states as if they were “glorified municipal corporations”. She has often said the UPA “does not seem to understand that people living in non-Congress states are as much citizens of India” as those in Congress-ruled states.
One of Jayalalitha’s first promises on becoming chief minister was that she would solve the power crisis within three months, which she later extended to “by 2012”. This led many to think she would help bring the KKNPP into early operation, for the state was entitled to a substantial share of the power generated. (In fact, the prime minister has written to Jayalalitha that Tamil Nadu would be allocated 925 of the 2,000 MW to be generated by Units 1 and 2 of the plant.) But she seems in no hurry on the already much-delayed project. Or perhaps, she has changed her mind.
The Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd (NPCIL) is building the reactors with Russian technology, the deal for which was signed way back in 1988, when Russia was still the USSR. After many a hiccup, a new deal was signed with Russia, land was acquired from the state government and construction began. Rs 13,000 crore has been spent so far. “One reactor will be commissioned soon; 95 per cent of the work on the second has been completed,” says Dr Kashinath Balaji, project director, KKNPP. According to the new MoU signed with Russia in 2008, four more reactors are to be set up.
Power supply, industrial and domestic, has been precarious in Tamil Nadu: last month, a CAG report said the state had added only 290 MW in generation capacity against the required capacity addition of 3,977 MW. The state’s inability to meet a big chunk of the power demand—the deficit sharpening in peak period—was a big minus point against the previous DMK regime. The demand is for 10,500-11,500 MW, and the state has an installed capacity of 10,237 MW, of which 8,000 MW is available, resulting in a shortfall of some 3,500 MW.
Well aware of this, Jayalalitha had at first appealed for an end to the agitation against the project. This was when S.P. Udhayakumar, convenor of the People’s Movement Against Atomic Power, began leading a fast by some 127 agitators in Idinthakarai on September 11. Over the next few days, as hundreds of fisherfolk and other locals joined the protest, she changed track and demanded the project be stopped till their fears were allayed. Given that local body elections were scheduled for October, she wrote on this issue to the prime minister. And on September 23, the Tamil Nadu cabinet adopted a resolution demanding suspension of work on the project.
In any case, as Udhayakumar puts it, the agitation is actually focused against the Centre. It regathered steam on October 9 after a lull, but made allowance for the local body elections on October 17; it was suspended that day and resumed on the next. In the current phase of the agitation, protesters are picketing all gates leading to the plant. “Only 100 employees are working, in three shifts,” admits Dr Balaji. Thousands of contract workers hired for the Koodankulam plant by NPCIL from Uttar Pradesh, Bihar and Jharkhand have gone away. The local economy has been hit badly: fishermen are being allowed to leave the picket lines in turns to go to sea and earn a living.
What has added to the locals’ fears—other than Fukushima, of course, and their own experience of the 2004 tsunami—was a deafening noise heard within four kilometres of the plant. The explanation offered by Prof B.C. Pathak, the chief construction engineer of the project, that the noise was caused by steam being used continuously to flush out pipelines, has no takers at present. “The world has a history of nuclear disasters,” says Nityanand Jayaraman, an activist. “Nuclear technology is inherently unmanageable,” he adds. Pathak’s attempts to explain to a gathering of protesters that Fukushima was 300 km from a tsunamigenic area, whereas Koodankulam was 1,500 km away from the source of the last tsunami, did not seem successful. Incidentally, the Madras Atomic Power Station (MAPS) in Kalpakkam, 70 km from Chennai, had set off worries after the 2004 tsunami: it was shut down for a bit.
The bottomline, however, is that the PM, who had staked his government on the Indo-US nuclear deal in 2008, is unlikely to backtrack on the plant. “They (the government) will divide and conquer,” says Gnani Sankaran, a writer and activist. But the shadow of Fukushima looms large, and the prime minister will have to negotiate the crisis carefully. He does have a secret weapon, though: former president Abdul Kalam, who speaks Tamil and has a background in science and overseeing nuclear projects, could be persuaded to allay the fears of the locals. Being a man from those parts may also lend Kalam’s voice some acceptance. Should the prime minister’s committee of experts fail to convince locals, Kalam might well be recruited. With Jayalalitha playing difficult, that might prove necessary.
When M. Karunanidhi was chief minister, he wanted the Koodankulam nuclear power plant (Generators of Power, Nov 7). Now, when his archrival J. Jayalalitha is in power, he opposes it. Clearly, he does not want her to take credit for addressing TN’s immense power shortage. The Christian priests who are leading the fisherfolk’s protest against the project are only doing so out of allegiance to Karunanidhi. At election time, they will make their secular payback by asking their flock to vote for the DMK and the Congress.
Prem Krishnan, Singapore
I see the hand and work of Christian missionaries in the protests by fisherfolk against the Koodankulam nuclear power plant and I suspect they are working to promote American interests. When the US backed India on obtaining a waiver from the Nuclear Suppliers Group, it was, of course, with the intention of garnering the maximum orders for American manufacturers of nuclear hardware. This was dampened by the passage of the law on nuclear liability. Since 1988, Tamil Nadu has been governed by the Dravidian parties—the DMK and the AIADMK—and when the deal with Russia for supplying the hardware for the plant was signed by the Centre in the intervening years, they never raised a voice of protest. But now, the DMK wants to oppose it because the AIADMK is in power, and hence supports the protest by fisherfolk. And the AIADMK, which had its eye on the local body elections, where it could not alienate the precious vote of the fisherfolk, maintained an expedient silence. Now the polls have been won, so hopefully the AIADMK will speak out and win over the protesters. For, Tamil Nadu badly needs the power that the plant will eventually supply.
N. Ramamurthy, Chennai
Karuna wanted the reactor operational during his period. Now he does not want Jaya to take credit and started playing mischief. The minority priests who miss him very much and like fish out of water without him show their gratitude by opposing that project. When elections approach these Secular priests will advise their community to vote for Congress and DMK
KIck out the PLPs ( Praise the lord party) also called Aleluia. The Problem will be solved.
This protest against the Koodankulam Nuclear Power project on the eve of its commissioning , is sphere headed by the Missionaries proably to server the US interests. . US took active part in the in NSG "waiver " in 2008 with the intention of garnering maximum order that was dampened by the passing of "Nuke Liability" bill 2010. The two Dravidan parties were ruling the state from the time,1988, when first agreement was signed with Russia ,have all of sudden started supporting the agitation knowing well the state badly need the 1000 MW power it would get from the plant.AIADMK and DMK by this "somersault trying to garner votes the christian community that has considerable presence in the area. Hope AIADMK which has "hardened" its stand now may 'soften' it once the "local' body elections are over.
JJ is no 'pussycat' to corruption. And too many saffronwadis ONLY want to play politics and refuse to see the corruption for what it really is.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT