When Sanjiv Bhatt was arrested on September 30, it was hardly as if the IITian IPS officer-turned-nemesis of CM Narendra Modi was caught unawares. He had been expecting the wrath of the administration to turn on him for long, right from November ’09 when he first spoke out on Modi’s complicity in the 2002 carnage. Since then, his depositions and affidavits at the SC-appointed Special Investigation Team (SIT), the Nanavati-Shah Commission and his latest writ petition in the SC, had made him a marked man. The writ alleged a nexus between Modi’s administration, lawyers for the accused and political entities to subvert justice in the riots cases.
The Gujarat government—Modi is also home minister—last year transferred Bhatt to the rather insignificant police training college in Junagadh, then scaled down his security cover earlier this year, suspended him two months back for being absent from work (the suspension order was served three days after Bhatt approached the SC), chargesheeted him on September 18 and finally arrested him. As the drama over his bail played out—police filed for his custody in a sessions court while a magistrate heard his bail plea—his Ahmedabad house was searched, so was his mother’s residence and attempts were made to access his bank lockers.
Wife Shweta dashed off letters to the Gujarat DGP Chittaranjan Singh pointing out that the Ahmedabad Crime Branch was known for their ‘fake encounters’, and to Union home minister P. Chidambaram saying that she feared a “danger to Bhatt’s life from a vindictive administration”. The MHA has since asked the Modi government to provide security to Bhatt and family, but it also went a step further and decided to carry out an independent assessment too. “This is the administration he worked for, look at what they have done,” Shweta told Outlook even as government spokesperson and BJP leader Jay Narayan Vyas insisted that “both the chargesheet and arrest were the correct legal actions” in the case.
The case, or FIR, is a subsidiary development; the crux of the battle here is the controversial high-level meeting called by Modi on February 27, ’02, night where he was apprised of possible communal violence but he insisted that Hindus “be allowed to vent their anger”. Bhatt was then DCP (state intelligence). Constable K.D. Pant’s FIR says Bhatt as his senior threatened him into signing a false affidavit about the meeting. The police have slapped Section 194 of the IPC on Bhatt, an offence punishable even by death. While Bhatt has submitted records to the SC and the Nanavati-Shah Commission about the meeting, his very presence has been challenged. Bhatt had told Outlook in April, “They are trying to break Pant, threatening him, digging out stuff like how he owns a four-wheeler etc.”
This then is not a simple case of penalising an errant officer; it’s a vindictive political battle between Modi and Bhatt, the man who knows too much. “Next to Haren Pandya’s information, Bhatt’s evidence and papers are the most damaging evidence against Modi’s role in the riots,” says R.B. Sreekumar, former DGP and Bhatt’s one-time boss. Shweta asks, “We all know what happened to Pandya, now Modi is after Bhatt. Is it a coincidence that this arrest closely followed the SC judgement last month that ruled Modi could stand as an accused in a local court?”
Bhatt is not the only high-ranking cop to have taken on Modi; 5-6 others too have suffered consequences for speaking out. But Bhatt could be more dangerous because he reportedly has in safe-keeping papers, reports and messages of those crucial days of February ’02; evidence the government admitted, in June this year, to destroying. The Modi-Bhatt battle has only just begun.
Narendra Modi is vindictive and ruthless (The Cop With the Key, Oct 17). He’s proved this once again with the way he’s hounding ips man Sanjiv Bhatt. Modi, who has PM ambitions, must know that this isn’t the sort of leader the nation looks forward to having.
Arvind Kumar, Leicester, UK
Modi has been maligned by the media for nearly 10 years. Under such an onslaught, anyone else would have given up politics altogether. But the man has chosen to let his work speak for him, bringing tremendous development in Gujarat. The days of dynastic Congress rule in the country are coming to an end.
Arun Prasad, Chennai
If Bhatt “reportedly has in safekeeping papers, reports and messages of those crucial days of February ’02, evidence the government admitted to destroying”, why didn’t he present it to the sit when it questioned him? In fact, the sit had found his accusations phony. If Bhatt has a key, there’s no proof yet it works.
Maha, New Jersey, US
Mr Bhatt is indeed facing a very powerful ENEMY , with enormous might and power of the State which Mr Modi can misuse to any extent, besides the state police and the bureaucracy can be counted as Chief Minister Modi's slaves/bonded labbour. However, if TRUTH and JUSTICE is on the side of Crusader Bhatt it will be a DAVID AND GOLIATH COMBAT, the final outcome is already decided.
>> I was comparing the moral-deficient crusade of those protesting Bhatt's arrest with Anna's crusade.
While neither of them is morally deficient, those who protest attempts to silence Bhatt are not running any crusade. They have registered and are registering their protest well (only today AIDWA has petitioned the Home Minister to intervene in the arrest and detention of Sanjeev Bhatt by the Gujarat Government). But to compare this to the anti-corruption movement is senseless.
>> "You are comparing Bhatt's arrest with Anna Hazare's movement?" - Anwaar
I was comparing the moral-deficient crusade of those protesting Bhatt's arrest with Anna's crusade. Bhatt apologists failed to sustain their movement becasue deep inside, they know the truth of Bhatt's propaganda. But, something even as simple as that would not seep through the rhino-skin that envelops your brains.
>> What happened to all those jokers protesting against Bhatt's arrest!?!! They are nowhere to be seen now. This is what happens when there is no moral fibre to bind a cause. In contrast, Anna Hazare's movement continues...
You are comparing Bhatt's arrest with Anna Hazare's movement?
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT