Myanmar’s pro-democracy leader, Aung San Suu Kyi, is free again; the strength of her support undiminished by the long spell of her detention. More than 40,000 people came out on the streets last weekend to get a glimpse of the 65-year-old Nobel peace prize laureate. The excitement and euphoria was intoxicating, diplomats at the gate of her home last Saturday told Outlook. The response of Mae, a 17-year-old university student in Yangon, was typical: “I am so excited that Suu Kyi is free. She has been under house arrest for most of my life, now we hope things are going to change here.” Several jubilant students even rated her release as the most exciting moment in their lives.
Comparisons can be odious, but observers noted that the crowds that flocked the National League for Democracy building to greet Suu Kyi were greater than those who turned up to celebrate her earlier release, on May 6, 2002. A significant proportion of those on the streets this time were young people who were barely aware of her existence in 2002. “I wasn’t interested in politics before the November 7 elections,” said Moe Myat, another student from Yangon. “Now I want to learn everything I can about the situation in my country, and Daw Suu can certainly help us change the country for the better.”
But do not mistake the release of Suu Kyi as Myanmar’s Mandela moment. There are significant differences between the release of Nelson Mandela in South Africa and that of Suu Kyi in Myanmar. Mandela’s walk to freedom was preceded by an agreement between him and then president of the apartheid-era South Africa, F.W. de Klerk. It was because of this agreement that Mandela’s release saw South Africa take a decisive turn—the apartheid system was dismantled to spawn a multiracial democratic system.
But the military junta leader, Than Shwe, is no de Klerk. Nor was the release of Suu Kyi preceded by an agreement similar to Klerk’s with Mandela, underwriting a democratic system guaranteeing rights to people. This is precisely why Hkun Htun, a Shan teacher in the north of the country, isn’t enthused: “We have had our hopes raised time and time again, only to have them dashed by the military junta—why should anything be different this time?”
Gen Than Shwe, experts contend, never does anything that is not in his interests. Maung Zarni of the London School of Economics, who has had long personal contact with many of the generals and their families says, “Than Shwe is only interested in extending his grip on power and protecting his economic interests and that of his family.” Many fear that her release is just a ploy to deflect international attention, particularly that of the United States. They feel the military regime is likely to lock Suu Kyi up should it feel threatened again. As Philippines foreign minister Alberto Romulo told Outlook at the recent asean summit in Hanoi, “As soon as she speaks out they will put her back in prison—so to speak.”
Suu Kyi has also carefully avoided commenting on Myanmar’s first elections in 20 years two weeks ago which the pro-junta party—the United Solidarity and Development Party—reportedly won convincingly, though all the other parties have complained of massive electoral fraud. Suu Kyi’s National League for Democracy (NLD) refused to re-register as a political party and was barred from the elections.
But the democracy icon steadfastly stood by her principles: “I believe in human rights and I believe in the rule of law.... I want to work with all democratic forces and I need the support of the people.” When she met the NLD leaders for the first time in over six years on Saturday, she said she would like to know the people’s genuine desire. Says a senior NLD member, Ohn Kyaing, “She told us we need to get in touch with the people.”
Her own desire to build alliances, to gauge the mood of the people cautiously, is in contrast to her popular deification. Zinn Lin, a spokesman for the pro-democracy movement and a former political prisoner, says, “Now she is out the whole country will rise up and follow her.” Adds the US-based Myanmar academic, Win Min, “The junta can cow everyone but not Suu Kyi.” Similarly, Zarni says, “She has become an institution and the public will rally around her as long as she’s alive.”
To conceive her future plan, Suu Kyi has been meeting with leaders of other political parties—including the breakaway National Democratic Force (NDF), which contested the elections—leaders of ethnic groups and members of the NLD youth wing. She is trying to forge alliances and coalitions with all opposition movements, hoping to establish a people’s network to coordinate information and plan any future action. To reach out to the country’s young, Suu Kyi wants to set up a Twitter account. She now has a mobile phone—her first ever—and may be having trouble operating it, a senior NLD official confided to Outlook.
Seven years ago, shortly before she was brutally attacked by pro-government thugs and ended up in detention, she had told this correspondent: “I feel a great attachment to India—because of the time I spent there. We all love to watch Hindi movies—Bollywood is better suited to Myanmar’s cultural sensitivities.”
For the moment, though, she is probably too busy to watch Hindi movies, for the pressure is on The Lady—as the junta refers to her—to make a difference, something she couldn’t bring about after her release on the last two occasions.
The piece on Aung San Suu Kyi was timely (Not Quite A Mandela Moment, Nov 29). May she and her people taste real freedom one day. May exiled Tibetans, and Palestinians cooped up in the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem also taste freedom.
David Albuquerque, Brisbane
To draw parallels between Mandela’s release from prison and Suu Kyi’s release from confinement is to obscure the context of the pro-democracy struggle in Myanmar. Mandela and Suu Kyi have both stood up for freedom and human rights. The comparison ends there.
Sunil Kumar, Delhi
Aung San Suu Kyi is the modern Joan Of Arc without advocating violence. Somewhat of a diminutive person who stands tall in front of the military junta that hell bend to try to destroy her spirits. She is a beacon of hope for the freedom loving Burmese earthlings.
And may people also note the irony or contrast in the miniscule amount of violence that the people of Myanmar and Tibet are indulging in, and the horrific levels the people of Kashmir are perpetrating. Without any justification.
May Aung San Suu Kyi and her people taste real freedom one day. May the 2.62 million Tibetans, the 2.5 million Palestinians in the West Bank, the 1.5 million in Gaza and the 177,000 in East Jerusalem too taste freedom.
To draw parallel between Mandela's release from prison and Suu Kyi's release from confinement is to obscure the context of pro democracy struggle in Myanmar.Mandela and Suu Kyi,both are leaders and speak for freedom and human rights.Comparison ends there.
Aung San Suu Kyi is all about substance. Mandela was media hyoe, go over Mandela's life and you will see that how he was created by hype and propagation
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT