Illustration by Ashish Bagchi
opinion
So What If You Aren’t Shahrukh, You Can Still Be An Ass
You may win the tactical fairness battle but consider the long-term costs involved—a life-long cosmetic prison, irreversible health damage

So how do people who become three shades lighter with the help of whitening creams feel about life? Do they become more successful, happier, non-stressed, more capable of handling tension or tragedy? Do they laugh more, earn more or have better sex? “Kaisa lag raha hai?”—that silly, stock TV reporter’s question—might actually yield far-reaching insights if asked of people who’ve risked mercury poisoning, skin-thinning, dermatological allergies and threats to the nervous system (all possible side-effects, researchers say, of the use of fairness creams) in the pursuit of fairness.

No survey has ever been done anywhere in the world to discover what fairness in four weeks achieves, apart from itself—lightness of being, emotional fulfilment, stable and healthy relationships or professional success? The randomly associated benefits of whitening creams dramatised in fairness lotion commercials—a good groom, a better job, confidence, beauty awards, mind and body rejuvenation—are mere projections.

In India, after arguing ourselves to the point of exhaustion about the unfairness of selling ‘fairness’ in the context of marriage, dowry, divorce, designation and dignity, we seem to have discarded fairness creams as an issue, perhaps seeing them as a lost cause. What else explains the fact that barely an eyebrow was lifted when new studies surfaced earlier this month from the US, with dermatologists reporting that some fairness lotions can not only contain steroids but mercury as well, which could lead to internal poisoning of the nervous system?

 
 
Not all whitening products contain hydroquinone, the banned chemical. But they do have metal derivatives and synthetic elements with potential risks.
 
 
Should we not worry about the fact that despite years of well-researched, scientific surveys on the harmful effects and allergic repercussions of fairness creams, the market for fairness products is growing and growing in India? Estimated at Rs 2,500 crore in 2008, with an annual growth rate of 20-25 per cent annually, the fairness segment is today at its belligerent best, inflating rapidly and gobbling 40 per cent of total sales of skincare items. Mass brands like Fair & Lovely, the matriarch in this line, is now in a fierce competitive dance with rival products from Lakme, Ponds, Garnier and Nivea, some of whom who have expanded the frontiers of the ‘fairness’ empire by launching fairness creams for men. Purveyors of ‘natural’, ‘herbal’ and ‘ayurvedic’ products, such as Himalaya and Shahnaz Husain, are not to be left behind. Global cosmetic giants, all aspiring for a lucrative share of India’s ‘fairness’ cake, seem to know exactly where to squeeze. Estee Lauder, for instance, came well-armed for India, where every bride tells her make-up artiste to make her look at least two shades lighter for her big night, with not just a whitening cream, but an Extra Whitening Cream. Not to be outdone, Chanel has Precision White Essentiel and Dior Prestige White.

Brands are about price and marketing hierarchies, so depending on your  budget and the intensity of your craze for fairness, you will find a product that suits your whims (or your mother-in-law’s, or your boyfriend’s) at between Rs 25 and Rs 7,500-plus for a 50 ml bottle. The labels have reinvented themselves with a vibrant new vocabulary. Fairness being overused and now politically incorrect, the consumer these days chooses among lightening, brightening, whitening, anti-pigmentation, anti-dullness, illuminating, clearing, freshening.

No, there is no dearth of choice, but there is clearly a dearth of judgement. Why do modern Indian women, now ostensibly independent, highly educated, well-travelled, broad-minded and aware, run after creams that may contain unsafe ingredients? Not all such creams contain hydroquinone, a synthetic skin-whitening ingredient banned in many countries, and mercury, that could lead to nervous system and endocrinal damage, but every whitening product does contain some synthetic elements and metal derivatives, which have potential risks.

Why do Bollywood stars, who claim to be global-local ambassadors of new India, agree to become brand ambassadors of products without being absolutely sure they are hundred per cent safe? Katrina Kaif, who is naturally fair, sells Olay’s Natural White. Preity Zinta, another fair lady, was not so long back the face of Fem’s Herbal Bleach. “It is not a bleach, it is a breakthrough,” said the ad. Wow! Sonam Kapoor sells L’Oreal’s White Perfect and Deepika Padukone sells Neutrogena’s Fine Fairness range. John Abraham dimples and offers you a shade card as he tries to convince you to buy Garnier’s Men’s fairness cream.

What’s especially worrying is that terms like ayurveda, natural, herbal, and adjectives like long-lasting, healthy, nourishing and enriching are used in conjunction with fairness products. (‘Herbal bleach’ sounds like such a slap to ayurveda!) If some of us can file PILs against reality TV shows that allegedly “debase” our thoughts, why not a PIL against the inappropriate labelling of fairness creams? If tobacco companies are liable to say smoking is injurious to health, why shouldn’t fairness creams be obliged to do the same on the crimp of the product? Why not at least definitive certification from laboratories that declares their ingredients safe? Shouldn’t the Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation (CDSCO), under the ministry of health, be legally empowered to recall harmful products for clinical testing in case of a complaint?

Fairness creams do make you temporarily lighter skinned. But for how long? How fair we are is not only genetically determined but is also dependent on factors like pollution, nutrition and everyday exposure to UV rays. Also, medication for common ailments like diabetes, hypertension and asthma may cause your skin to darken a bit. No whitening cream can help anyone battle clinically related skin-darkening. While using fairness products, the skin has to be constantly protected from sun damage and, as any good doctor will tell you, as soon you stop using these potions, the effects reverse. Which means, you are signing up for a lifetime use of potentially risky products to stay fair. Does your insurance policy cover expenses to treat dermatological allergies or irreversible damage to the body due to extensive use of whitening products? Or do you plan to give them up after retirement, or perhaps after your daughter is married? It’s not a feminist, class or race debate anymore—at least not exclusively. It’s a health and safety issue. Perhaps it is time to be fair to ourselves.

Translate into:
 
Daily MailPublished
COLLAPSE COMMENTS :
HAVE YOUR SAY
Jan 30, 2010 01:44 PM
1
When I see John Abraham soliciting the fairness cream in his shirtless avatar on the beach I wonder how many tubes he must be consuming daily "all over his body" to maintain a uniform skin-tone all over the exposed epidermis?
With the proliferating clutter of such brands being "endorsed" by filmstars one really wonders at the gullibility of the buyer.. and as these are all OTC products the damage is intense (to the pocket, to one's self-image, and uppermost one's skin!)
Harsh Rai Puri
Bhopal, India
Jan 30, 2010 01:50 PM
2
Ironically when I opened this page the ad at the top was for Kaya Skin Clinic with the catchphrase "discover radiant beauty from deep within"... and at the side was one for "Acumen Fund" promising "building transformative businesses to solve the problems of poverty".

Stars ought to be selective about the products they endorse - and display both ethical and aesthetic sensibilities! SRK is reported to drink only Pepsi yet its reported that he had qualms about the Emami Fairness Cream for men.. which one guesses were overcome by the size of the contract moolah on offer!!
Harsh Rai Puri
Bhopal, India
Jan 30, 2010 07:55 PM
3
>Stars ought to be selective about the products they endorse

They won't be 'stars' if they starts being choosy. They would be sensible ordinary mortals if they start picking & choosing. Question is about advertising ethics. Since there is no self-sensor by advertisers, sensor need be imposed. Regulators should come out of the woodwork & tell these bounders that pigmentation of the skin is genetic & there is no fairness quick-fix. Period.
MANISH BANERJEE
KOLKATA, India
Jan 31, 2010 10:05 AM
4
There is no escaping the Indian obsession with fair skin. Television and print advertisements are dominated by fairness creams and it's a prime requirement in most matrimonial columns. We Indians are subject to complex bigotries within our own cultures. In the subcontinent, light skin has historically been linked to high caste, wealth and sophistication while dark skin gets equated with the lower strata of society. Others link it to our colonial past but the fact remains that white skin is eminently desirable: in more ways than one. Just check out the personal columns in the country's leading newspapers. Every day, ads appear offering massage services by 'white girls’, some are even more sexually explicit about the services on offer.

Aforementioned paragraph is copied from India Today’s editor –in-Chief Aroon Purie’s editorial because I couldn’t have paraphrased it any better than his original piece. Indian fetish for white skin is demeaning to Indian earthlings whose pigmentation is of lighter or darker. We have predilection for white skins over darker skinned our own Indian fellow human beings. Moreover, we discriminate our own darker skinned Indians. Isn’t it pot calling the kettle black when we accuse others, especially white-skinned foreigners of discrimination?

Either the media-print and electronic-should have self-regulation in objecting these misleading advertisements, or the government should step in to stop these misleading advertisements which are rallying point for insecure dark skinned Indians to splurge on these whitening creams in the hope to become white over time.
Scaria Varghese
Melbourne, Australia
Jan 31, 2010 01:05 PM
5
Possibly one would like to make a distinction between white skin & fair skin. There is no point in remaining in denial that generally fair skin as distinct from white skin is more desirable & fetish with Indians. No amount of rightuous sermonising will change that reality.

The issue is whether dark pigmentation of the skin can be transformed into fairer one by application of cream or any beautification procedure. The scientific answer is emphatic no. So these fairness cream ads. are unethical & misleading.
MANISH BANERJEE
KOLKATA, India
Jan 31, 2010 07:53 PM
6
A nation which brings upon itself a good for nothing Sonia and Rahul,to rule over them, just because they are fair skinned people answers this question of superiority of fair skin.No other race in the world suffers from this inferiority complex other than the Indians.
S.S.Nagaraj
Bangalore, India
Feb 01, 2010 12:13 AM
7
Not Only in India; all the Bharatha Country People have this white-skin-Love. This is Evil as Caste System.
Dilshan
Auckland, New Zealand
Feb 02, 2010 04:15 AM
8
Being raised in Australia, I could never understand India's fixation with fair skin.

After coming home from a day at the beach, my mother or aunty would often comment "...you are looking so dark" as though it was a bad thing!! And I always thought I looked fit and healthy and that my brown skin was the envy of my fair skinned Aussie mates!!
Brian
Melbourne, Australia
Feb 02, 2010 11:13 AM
9
I say let the fools who want to be white spend health and fortune in the pursuit.
It is a free world and there are inequalities galore around every corner.
People will soon tire and new people will enter the zone, I mean users.
We involuntarily take in gallons of pesticide, dirt and pollutants , depending on our rather unequal economic status and our insides are a real mess we are told.
We choose to drink and feed our children toxic cokes and feed them toxic foods . The skin lightener is just another assault on human bodies.
Is the content any worse than that of a hair dye or a wrinkle remover or a iro supplement?
I dont know just asking?
Ms Vasudev is being ultra liberal to raise an issue that has so many Indians enslaved.
She is a journalist an she must write.
I dont see it as a specially shocking issue.
Every individual has to find his or her position in the world through a fine itinerant method of growth and maturation.
This foolish fairness fetish is just one silly point on the journey.
Big Deal!
And John Abraham looks made of plastic from head to toe, dimples notwithstanding.
Role model?
Oh come on he is just a sexy dumb doll.
I think Ms Vasudev edits some fashion magazine and why nature defying girls and boys feature in it, mostly fair ones, some so painfully thin others so dreadfully balanced on deforming footwear, some with clothes stripped off and others with faces lathered with the goo of the worlds cosmetics, should be explained by ms Vasudev.
Bindu Tandon
Mumbai, India
Feb 02, 2010 01:35 PM
10
Indian middle & upper class girls are generally good looking not necessarily fair, compared to average caucasian young women. Now if some of these girls want to spoil their looks with patches & botches on their chin due to contnued use of so called fairness skin lured by false ads - that's a tragedy. This place will be little less cheerful.
MANISH BANERJEE
KOLKATA, India
Feb 02, 2010 03:16 PM
11
Indians do have fetish for fair skin and black can never be beautiful for us. Every attempt are made to lighten the skin of dark girls at home, from fairness cream to haldi chandan paste.

I was rejected by "ladkewaale" on the ground of complexion only. They said " ladki saawli hai, we want fairer bride"

Its not only Indians who are crazy about fair skin, I came to know that fair n lovely is sold in 40 countries!
Manjari Singh
Lucknow, India
Feb 03, 2010 11:11 AM
12
Manish -- "The issue is whether dark pigmentation of the skin can be transformed into fairer one by application of cream or any beautification procedure."

The real issue is our obsession with fair skin. Its a disgusting, demeaning hangover from colonial days. Its a testament to our collective shame. Nothing less. In the words of Tupac Shakur (!!) ... the darker the berry the sweeter the juice !! I wish we Indians would just recognize that.
dev raya
Bangalore, India
Feb 03, 2010 11:41 AM
13
Shefalee,
I think its time Indians begin to think about the "Raj - Complex" in a different way. Strangely even after over half a century of freedom from the Brits, our complex over colour of skin remain the same - we feel inferior because of our coloured skin which advertisers are using to add jingle to their cash boxes. The highest sale of Fair & Lovely continues to be the highest in the south, particularly, Tamil Nadu. Pawam!
Julia Dutta
Bhopal, India
Feb 03, 2010 11:43 AM
14
Shefalee,
I think its time Indians begin to think about the "Raj - Complex" in a different way. Strangely even after over half a century of freedom from the Brits, our complex over colour of skin remain the same - we feel inferior because of our coloured skin which advertisers are using to add jingle to their cash boxes. The highest sale of Fair & Lovely continues to be the highest in the south, particularly, Tamil Nadu. Pawam!
Julia Dutta
Bhopal, India
Feb 03, 2010 11:02 PM
15
I have copper toned skin and I love it. As a teen I was in constant need of people's approval. now i have grown up and i just give a damn about others opinion about my look.
sulagna
Bhubaneswar, India
Feb 04, 2010 07:32 AM
16
It's more than just 'color'- it's also about caste.
The so-called lowest castes and the adivasis are darker-complected than those calling themselves 'upper' castes.
Compounding this fairness issue, is the bigotry of the European rulers, which further acerbated the problem, as everyone knows Europeans claimed their superior status from the color of their skin or rather lack of color, as white is not a 'color', nor for that matter, black.
Sooner or later people will have to accept that color is only skin-deep.
Bodh
Springfield, United States
Feb 04, 2010 08:32 AM
17
The fixation with fair skin here is much more deep rooted & age old than 'hangover from colonial days' or 'bigotry of the European rulers'. Ancient Indian literatur is replete with adulatory imagary of women's lips as red as the parrot's beak or their cheeks like succulent ripened mango, which happens only with fair skinned damsels.

That, of course, does not mean the 'saawali''ladki' is any less beatiful.( Hope Manjari Singh did kick those 'ladkewaale' in the teeth & told them to get lost). Because the same ancient literature is also profuse in praise of the 'swaali' belle.
MANISH BANERJEE
KOLKATA, India
Feb 05, 2010 07:53 PM
18
i have always wondered why 'fair and lovely' isnt showing its miraculous effects in the african continent.maybe they werent visible in the night before they discovered 'fair and lovely'
SAB
Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
COLLAPSE COMMENTS   
Post a Comment
You are not logged in, please log in or register
ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISING RATES | COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER | COMMENTS POLICY