Opinion
Why Can't Kantabai Be My Child's Guru?
A recent full-page advertisement direly warned that she just might, and added: "While your child is learning your maid’s language, someone else’s child is learning a foreign language.” So?

 Is Kantabai becoming your child’s guru? 

That’s how a recent full-page advertisement of the Genesis Global School in Noida began. “When your child is wasting her after-school hours at home,” the pitch went on, “someone else’s child is mastering her dribbling in our basketball court. While your child is learning your maid’s language, someone else’s child is learning a foreign language…”

Hopefully, the ad got your attention not for what was intended – publicising the five-star school – but for its shocking elitist tone. There’s the obvious class-bias that makes the rich think they are born entitled to trod on the poor and all that they represent. To the creators and sponsors of this repugnant ad, I have two simple retaliatory questions: 

  • Why can’t Kantabai be my child’s guru? 
  • And why should some opinionated and prejudiced faculty member at Genesis be instead my child’s guru? 

It may seem an exaggeration but “global” education like this will only deepen the divide between India’s haves and have-nots.

 Click Here for Large Image

That point made, I want to move to another that I found equally enraging, if not more. It is the inherent and distinct language bias in the ad. Your children, the ad preached, would only be a loser if she spent time learning your maid’s language. Instead, it was suggested, he or she ought to be mastering a foreign one at Genesis. I hope you are equally repulsed. Why should a maid’s language be inferior to any other language, Indian or foreign?

I am no linguistic romantic or idealist. If a language has to survive, a thriving economy must be built around it. Why else do you think there is a sudden rush to learn Mandarin? The central reason why languages are dying – and there’s one that perishes somewhere in the world every fortnight – is because its speakers find no economic incentive to learn, speak and teach it. That’s also the reason why “foreign” languages offered at schools like Genesis do not go beyond the few profitable ones like French, German and Spanish. You think Genesis and its ilk offer foreign languages like Swahili, Amharic, Berber or Inuit? For that matter, even Arabic or Persian? I wish they did.

It’s fair for a school to offer languages that promise better careers for their students. I can’t challenge that. But does that give them, and us, a carte blanche to denigrate other languages? What can you expect of an “international” or a “global” school that insists Kantabai’s fascinating creole of Marathi, Hindi and English is inferior to French? And will any foreign-educated faculty at Genesis be able to match Kantabai’s vast repertoire of folk tales? The thought that the language and culture of the poor and marginalized must be inferior should only evoke revulsion. Languages thrive among the marginalized, often more than in privileged circles. Verlan, a spunky language that borrows words from French and inverts the syllables, has flourished in the Parisian suburbs known for their poor immigrant neighbourhoods.

Linguistic discrimination of the Genesis kind, something many Indians are guilty of, makes for the first blow to the plurality of languages that India enjoys. This unique diversity is under increasing threat and biased grooming at schools like these can only speed up the unfortunate process of linguistic homogenisation. Even the relatively well-off Hindi suffers from this as its speakers replace words, even entire phrases, in Hindi with those from English. Ever noticed how numbers in Hindi in the Devanagari script have nearly vanished? Take any Hindi paper and you will see that numbers are written in their Latin form. You probably missed this significant shift, which proves my point that Indians haven’t learnt to respect indigenous linguistic traditions. You also probably don’t take offence when Hindi or any other Indian language is rendered in ads in the Latin script.

It is because of this inferiority complex that, for example, a waiter at a five-star will make it a point to speak in halting and incomprehensible English when he and his guest can speak fluently in Hindi. Languages, other than English, seemingly are not suited to air-conditioned environs. No child must grow up feeling that the language spoken at home is inferior to English or a foreign language. The fact that so many children today in India look down on their mother tongues and speak barely passable versions of indigenous languages must stand as an indictment of our educational system and families who have collectively failed to develop any attachment among them to Indian languages. 

And it is the convent, “international” and “global” schools that have done more damage than any other. Many of them actually forbid their students from speaking any language but English. Government schools, despite their poor quality, fare much better and deserve more support for the stupendous task they do of keeping indigenous languages alive. It is clear that schools like Genesis before going global must inculcate and respect all that’s local – that includes Kantabai, her language and her culture.

 

 
Daily Mail
COLLAPSE COMMENTS :
HAVE YOUR SAY
Nov 11, 2009 03:39 AM
10
This is not something that just happens in India. French is considered superior to Spanish in the US. Parents pride their kids are learning French in school and I always ask What about Spanish?. With over 50 million spanish speakers in the US and less than 100,000 native french speakers, who is this kid going to speak to in French. I guess French is considered eilte.
abhishek
chicago, USA
Nov 08, 2009 07:28 PM
9
The ultimate discrimanting machine that we are. We adopt the modern in "form" - today it is even post-modern - the popular term being global (citizen, of course) and invent new castes (heirarchies to discrimate).
Arun Maheshwari
Bangalore, India
Nov 07, 2009 01:01 AM
8
Some Kantabais can be super-gurus!

"BANGALORE: The worst nightmare of working parents entrusting the care of their children to nannies became a reality for a city couple recently. As soon as they would kiss their little one goodbye, the nanny would feed him and get him ready - for a day of begging on the streets of Bangalore. Instead of milk, the baby was fed sedatives; instead of the clothes carefully put out by his parents, she would dress him up in rags.

The modus operandi was simple - she would hand the seven-month-old baby to beggars for Rs 100 a day and lie back at her employers' home, watch soaps and feed herself to her heart's content. And this was not an `ayah' picked up by hearsay reference, she came duly recruited by an employment agency, considered a safe option." (TOI)
Anwaar
Dallas, United States
Nov 06, 2009 11:56 PM
7
"But a simple question is, why would and should a child learn a maid's language? "

Yes, better to communicate with the maid using sign language and grunts.
K.V. Bapa Rao
Los Angeles, USA
Nov 06, 2009 09:46 PM
6
Kantabai would be my guru as well!

The article also exposes another reality - that (1) There is a Kantabai in the house, and (2) The parents do not have the time for the child.
Biju Negi
Dehra Dun, India
Nov 06, 2009 08:46 PM
5
>>Why should a maid’s language be inferior to any other language, Indian or foreign?

Because it is less lucrative and less useful in the rat race of social climbing. And this game of one upsmanship represents the outer limits of the middle-class imagination.

Notwithstanding the unimaginative and narrowness of the middle-class, this author overstates his argument.
Augustus AAA
Pune, India
Nov 06, 2009 06:47 PM
4
English, Chinese or Arabic would and should take precedence over Kantabai's language for those who can afford it.

Anwaar
Dallas, United States
================================

Don't post stupid comments Anwar. I understand English is useful one but no reason in the world to give importance to Chinese or Arabic languages.
dharma
Toronto, Canada
Nov 06, 2009 12:42 PM
3
There is nothing wrong in exposing the child to Kantabai's language. It can be mind expanding. However when chalking out a formal education plan for the child, English, Chinese or Arabic would and should take precedence over Kantabai's language for those who can afford it.
Anwaar
Dallas, United States
Nov 06, 2009 11:43 AM
2
I don't buy the core argument of this debate. It appears the writer was trying hard to find something to object to and picked up on this add. What is more surprising is outlook thought it to be a valid article to publish.

I agree with all the commentry about elitism ...etc..

But a simple question is, why would and should a child learn a maid's language?
Are we saying the maids are now to be role models for our children, with some twisted logic that is sub-intelligently and painstakingly purposely being manufactured by the writer.

The alternatives in discussion are any day better than learning the maids language.


Allan
Allan Ferreira
Sydney, Australia
Nov 06, 2009 02:46 AM
1
It's especially ironic, since elite schools in America have, for some time, been making a point of promoting socioeconomic diversity in their student body. Not so much out of a misplaced sense of charity towards the poorer sections, but out of a recognition that the children of the rich need to learn to interact successfully (that means not in a master-slave mode) with all segments of society.

So, the upshot for the children of these Genesis social climbers would be that they will lose out in a global career on account of inability to be comfortable on equal terms with people from various socioeconomic and ethnic backgrounds. Oh well.
K.V. Bapa Rao
Los Angeles, USA
COLLAPSE COMMENTS   
Post a Comment
You are not logged in, please log in or register
ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISING RATES | COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER | COMMENTS POLICY