South Asia 2020
Cooperation Or Conflict?
'The relationship we have with China is complex but growingly variegated in texture and substance... outstanding issues in our relationship with China will take time to be resolved'
Keynote Address by Foreign Secretary at IDSA Conference on “SOUTH ASIA 2020: Moving towards Cooperation or Conflict?” (Nov 4-5, 2009), at New Delhi on November 04, 2009

***
On the sideslines of the conference, the foreign secretary, when queried on the issue of construction of a dam at the Zangmu site on the Chinese side of the Brahmaputra river, which was confirmed by the National Remote Sensing Agency (NRSA) as per media reports, said, "What I want to say is that this matter has been taken up not just once but on a number of occasions with China and China has consistently denied that it is engaged in any such construction activity on the Brahmaputra."

***
Thank you for asking me to speak at this important Conference on South Asia organized by the Institute of Defence and Strategic Analyses.

That we strive for a peaceful and stable neighbourhood, and for building peaceful and mutually beneficial relations with our neighbours goes without saying. This is an issue of critical importance since in the absence of such a neighbourhood, our efforts to play any substantive regional or global role, in accordance with our size and economic strength, and also our unhindered economic development would stand to be affected. Therefore, having a peaceful and stable neighbourhood is one of our top most foreign policy goals.

The proposed theme of this Conference on the prognosis for the South Asian region in the coming decade is indeed of critical relevance to India and the region. The sub-text – moving towards cooperation or conflict – is in a sense also reflective of our collective efforts in the region to forge a more integrated South Asian region and the successes and shortcomings of the SAARC process, which is a tangible expression of these efforts. A certain sense of disappointment is understandable. While, we have indeed come a long way since SAARC was established in 1985, there is also no denying the fact that SAARC has not moved as quickly and substantively as all of us would have desired. An example that readily comes to mind is ASEAN. The ASEAN experience is a clear signal to potential opportunities that can be realized if we were to accelerate the process of regional integration. Greater economic cooperation and connectivity should be the lodestars for this endeavour.

Given our shared history and common cultural, linguistic and ethnic ties, there has always existed an implicit assumption that greater regional integration should have been easy to achieve. But that has not been the case. How do we do achieve this goal? What are the challenges we face on the path to such achievement? What is our approach to the region?

We believe that the future of peace, security and development of South Asia has to be embedded in the paradigm of common economic prosperity. India is also already engaged in this process at the bilateral level and collectively as part of the SAARC process. The challenge today for us is to build inter-dependencies which not only integrate our region but also create a vested interest in each other’s stability and prosperity. Critical to this endeavour is connectivity of goods, people and ideas. India has also actively provided development assistance and is engaged in capacity augmentation and institution-building exercises in our neighbouring countries. Within this overall approach, there is the challenge of evolving differentiated responses best suited to the requirements of our neighbours as they are in varying stages of transition both on the political and socio-economic fronts.

I would argue that it is the threat of terrorism that is the most important threat facing us and which if not addressed immediately and collectively has the potential to engulf the region and beyond. At the same time, there are other developments that signal cautious optimism. Most of our neighbours are going through major internal political transformations that express the voice and aspirations of their peoples. India has been actively engaged with its neighbours to promote peace and stability in the subcontinent. There is also the challenge of managing relations with our immediate neighbours on account of the geography of the region and also because our bilateral relations cannot be seen solely from the foreign policy perspective.

Let me elaborate. Geography has played an important role in shaping perceptions of our neighbours in South Asia towards India. That India is a large country is a given fact. This in itself causes apprehensions of so-called domination among our neighbours. It is also a fact that most of our neighbours share borders not only with India but also in most cases with one more country in the region. However, in an almost gravitational sense, they have to necessarily depend on India for physical connectivity in the region. This dependence is more acute for land-locked countries. India has thus to play a central role in carrying forward the process of improving connectivity in the region. What is it that India can do to ensure that our neighbours feel more secure about us and that our approach is seen as more inclusive? Today, with sustained high economic growth rates over the past decade, India is in a better position to offer a significant stake to our neighbours in our own prosperity and growth. We have consistently conveyed to our neighbours that they need to see India as an opportunity and that India is ready to work with them for mutual benefit.

There is also a need to recognize that our relations with immediate neighbours in South Asia also have a clear domestic dimension. For example, our relations with Myanmar need to take into account the presence of tribal groups across our borders that can influence developments and impact on security in our bordering states of Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur and Mizoram. At the same time, these links could also be a powerful binder. Our dealings with Nepal need to take into consideration perspectives of bordering States such as U.P., Bihar, Sikkim. Similarly, our initiatives with Bangladesh need to take into account perspectives of West Bengal and our North-eastern States on issues such as migration, water sharing, trade or transportation.

There is also the challenge of globalisation that has brought problems of a transnational nature in its wake and that makes it mandatory for us to seek collaborative inter-state and regional responses. These problems include issues such as organised crime, money-laundering, pandemics, food security, energy security, etc.

Terrorism remains a central challenge to regional security. This was again underscored by the terrorist attack on our Mission in Kabul on 8 October 2009 as also previously by frequent terrorist incidents including the 26/11 Mumbai attacks. There is a real challenge posed by resurgence of the Taliban and Al Qaeda. There is a need for the international community to recommit itself in assisting Afghanistan. India is also playing its due part. Our assistance programme in Afghanistan worth US$ 1.2 billion has been focussed on building indigenous Afghan capacities and institutions for an effective state system that is able to deliver goods and services to the Afghan people.

There is a growing consensus that the increase in terrorist activities in Afghanistan is linked to the support and sanctuaries available in the contiguous areas. The international community should put effective pressure on Pakistan to implement its stated commitment to deal with terrorist groups within its territory or else the gains of the past eight years in Afghanistan would be wiped out. Failure to act effectively runs the risk of catapulting the region into a spiral of violence that would inevitably adversely affect the region including India. Recent incidents in our neighbourhood are also a stark reminder that those who strike Faustian bargains with such elements are often left to rue the consequences. We cannot afford to lose the battle against the ideologies of hatred, fanaticism and violence. We must act jointly and with determination to meet the challenge posed by terrorism and to defend the values of pluralism, peaceful coexistence and the rule of law.

We firmly believe that a stable Pakistan at peace with itself and region is a desirable objective. We have, on several occasions, conveyed to the Pakistani leadership our desire to engage in meaningful discussions and to develop our relations in a positive manner. This is only possible when Pakistan fulfils its commitment not to allow its territory to be used for terrorist activities against India.

Notwithstanding the threat that terrorism poses, other developments in the region, which if sustained and handled carefully, augur well for the region. India is also playing its due role to ensure that these developments become a source of greater stability in the region. Nepal today is undergoing a transition towards to a democratic polity. India has supported this process. We had also provided assistance to the peace process, including vehicles, communication equipment, electronic voting machines and other logistical support worth Rs 150 crores. We have been encouraging all political parties to cooperate with the new government in working towards early conclusion of the peace process on the basis of widest possible consensus.

The comprehensive defeat of the LTTE in Sri Lanka provides the country with a historic opportunity to ensure a future free from terrorism and conflict. We support a lasting political settlement in Sri Lanka that meets the political aspirations of all communities through the effective devolution of power. We have extended humanitarian assistance to Sri Lanka including for the rehabilitation of internally displaced persons. We are moving from purely relief efforts to a broader rehabilitation and reconstruction phase. The Government has already committed Rs. 500 crores for this purpose. Our assistance so far covers humanitarian supplies such as food, medicines, shelter material, and other essential supplies. We set up an emergency field hospital that treated over 50,ooo people in the past six months’. Four Indian de-mining teams are presently working in Northern Sri Lanka. We are also providing assistance to revive agriculture there. Both sides are also discussing our readiness to assist in reconstruction of critical civil infrastructure in Sri Lanka.

A welcome development was the return of Bangladesh to multi-party politics. We are working closely with the newly elected Government to build further on our historical bonds of friendship and to take our relations forward in a mutually beneficial way. The Bangladesh leadership has assured us that Bangladesh’s territory will not be allowed to be used by elements inimical to the interests of India.

Our close relations with Bhutan had developed further during the last one year and since the introduction of democracy in Bhutan. The India-Bhutan Friendship Treaty updated in 2007 not only reflects the contemporary nature of our relationship but also lays the foundation for their future development in the 21st century.

With Myanmar, India has consistently maintained that the national reconciliation process should be expedited and be more broad-based. We hope that free and fair elections would be held in Myanmar in 2010 as scheduled. Our engagement with Myanmar has grown constructively in recent years.

India welcomed the first multi-party elections held in Maldives in October 2008. Both governments are committed to maintaining and developing our close and friendly relations.

The SAARC process offers an important vehicle for achievement of a peaceful, prosperous and stable South Asian region. As the largest country in the region and its strongest economy, India has expressed its willingness to assume greater responsibility to encourage the SAARC process. In recent years, SAARC is undergoing a transformation from a declaratory to an implementation phase. Its core institutional mechanisms have been activated, namely, the SAARC Food Bank, the SAARC Development Fund, the South Asian University, the SAARC Arbitration Council, and the SAARC Regional Standards Organization. We have also disbursed our voluntary and assessed contributions of US$190 million. This is in line with India’s asymmetric and non-reciprocal commitments to SAARC.

We are also pursuing several other regional economic cooperation mechanisms involving the region. These include the Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation, BIMSTEC. India is also a Summit Partner of the Association of South East Asian countries. These ties are growing exponentially as was witnessed during last week’s Summit meetings in Thailand.

With regard to bilateral economic and commercial relations in the South Asian region, India has taken the lead. India is largest trade partner and one of the most important foreign investors in our neighbouring countries. We have established a free trade arrangement with Sri Lanka. There is duty free access wef January 1, 2008 for products originating from Bangladesh, except for items in the sensitive list, which has also been substantially pruned down.

In terms of trade infrastructure and connectivity, there are 15 transit routes from Kolkata /Haldia to Nepal for its third country trade. We have now agreed to add Vishakhapatnam port for this purpose. The creation of an ICD in Birgunj and extension of the railway line from Raxaul to Birgunj has facilitated movement of goods in transit by rail. There is also a direct road transit route from Nepal to Bangladesh for bilateral and third country trade. A direct railway transit route is under discussion. With Bangladesh, we have more than 20 operational land customs stations, 4 points for movement of goods by train and 8 routes for movement through river systems. Dhaka is connected with Kolkata by road and train service and to Agartala by bus service. With Myanmar, we are undertaking the Kaladan Multi Modal Transit Project involving sea, river and road connectivity and several road projects across the border.

Better connectivity is necessary to fully utilize our geographical resources endowment. The Government has embarked on an ambitious programme for upgradation of border infrastructure along our borders with Nepal, Bhutan, Myanmar and Bangladesh. These projects involve upgradation of highways, extension of railway lines into neighbouring countries, restoration of rail links with Pakistan and Bangladesh and setting up of integrated check points. These projects would lead to improvement of infrastructure in our bordering areas and improvement of transport connectivity with them.

SAARC has also already identified a number of projects based on its regional multi-model transport study. In addition to increasing connectivity between India and its neighbours, several road corridors have been identified linking Afghanistan-Pakistan; Afghanistan-Pakistan-India-Nepal; Bangladesh-India-Nepal, etc. There is also a proposal to restore the ferry service between India and Sri Lanka through Colombo-Cochin route.

Our aspirations of full regional connectivity would not be met merely through physical connectivity. We also need to put in place enabling mechanisms to make travel freer and easier. India has taken measures to liberalise visas for students, teachers, professors, journalists and patients from SAARC countries. South Asia University is an ambitious project reflecting our effort to enhance connectivity of the mind. The SAARC University Project, which is scheduled to open in less than a year, would cater to more than 5000 students, when fully operational in five years’ time.

Development cooperation is a natural and well-recognized method to promote closer regional ties. Our own fast pace of economic growth exerts a ripple effect in the region as it attracts our neighbours to access the benefits that stem from the growth of our market, our infrastructure, and our level of development in various fields, be it education, healthcare, financial services, and communications. As mentioned earlier, India has been actively involved in providing development assistance to our neighbours.

We have also begun discussing issues such as food security and climate change that impact on our development strategies and need our focused attention. The South Asia region is highly vulnerable to the effects of climate change in particular due to potential melting of glaciers and inundation of low lying islands and coastal areas. Increased glacier melts would initially cause floods but would eventually lead to reduced water flows in our major rivers. All these developments would have severe implications for food and water security in South Asia.

India is constructively engaging in the multilateral negotiations taking place under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). The main principle on which the Convention is based is the principle of “common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities”. We firmly believe that Climate Change should not be an excuse to add a greater burden or impose conditionalities onto the development challenges that developing countries face. We also have to move away from concentrating on ‘mitigation’ only and ensure that there is a focus on adaptation, which is critical for developing countries.

Cognizant of the threat that Climate Change poses, India has already taken several independent initiatives. India has launched National Action Plan on Climate Change and India stands ready to share its experience with our neighbours. There are number of areas that are relevant to them such as our mission on sustaining the Himalayan ecosystem, protection of coastal areas, disaster management strategies and collaborative research on climate change modeling.

My address would be incomplete without addressing the subject of our relations with China, our largest neighbor. China borders our region of South Asia, and with India alone, it shares a border of almost 3500 km. The relationship we have with China is complex but growingly variegated in texture and substance. The rapid growth of both India and China is a phenomenon that in many ways is a source of energy and dynamism in the regional and global context. I see our dialogue with China acquiring further substance and relevance in the years to come, with even more effort and political will being invested in seeking a fair, reasonable and mutually acceptable settlement of the outstanding boundary question between the two countries. The maintenance of peace and tranquility in the border areas will receive close and continuing attention in this scenario. We are however conscious of the fact that outstanding issues in our relationship with China will take time to be resolved.

China’s relations with our South Asian neighbours are also growing in many areas with increased trade and economic activity, political level interaction, and cultural and educational exchanges, apart from transportation links and connectivity. But the compelling logic and rationale for closer ties between our South Asian neighbours and India must not be deterred or diluted by such developments. These are ties dictated by geography, the need for security and stability, mutual economic advantage, transit and connectivity, shared cultural traditions, the movement of people, common approaches to the management of natural disasters and climate change, and developmental priorities that can only be achieved by close cooperation and constant dialogue.

In conclusion, and on balance, I believe that we can look to the future with a sense of optimism and purpose. We stand committed to both bilateral and regional efforts in building a stable, peaceful, vibrant and economically prosperous South Asia. The year 2020 is an achievable target date and we must jointly work to this end.

I am also certain that deliberations at this important conference would come up with useful ideas and suggestions that governments in the region can draw upon in our endeavour to forging closer regional integration. I wish the conference all success.

 
Daily Mail
COLLAPSE COMMENTS :
HAVE YOUR SAY
Nov 14, 2009 12:12 AM
24
mubaraq ali

you have expressed the views of the believers. this is
something a lot of us agnostic liberals should have in mind.

it is clear that your values are different from mine .
i like to have a glass of wine now and then, and to look at nice looking girls wearing short skirts, and
blouses. it makes me happy to see them smile and laugh.

i understand your views, and its important for
us to know how you feel.

however i can not help saying this. what do young muslim girls have to say. are they happy wearing a black burqa in the very hot weather in chennai.

have you ever tried to walk about in a burqa when you
go out to work or for shopping.

you should try it.
gayatri devi
delhi, India
Nov 13, 2009 10:45 PM
23
I was very overwhelmed when I read about the measures undertaken by India, through the address of the foreign secretary. But, if I may, I wonder, what is the end to all these measures undertaken? If the world is working for the spread of progress, then why has not the world achieved it? We cannot say, that a work in progress, will remain a work in progress. That is not the definition of progress. That is the definition of stagnation. I was very much touched by the efforts undertaken by India, in various measures, and it struck me, that the work undertaken by the Indian government is great, even for the efforts of India. But if there is to be continuous progress for ever, then where is the progress achieved?
Aditya Mookerjee
Belgaum, India
Nov 12, 2009 10:07 AM
22
>>Don't you agree that the Indians committed an incredibly stupid folly by allowing the Dalai Lama to set up his so-called government in exile in India?

No. It has the dual purpose of siding with the oppressed and a diplomatic finger sticking in the eye of the chinaman.

>>No wonder the Chinese are bitter about India.

They will lose a bitterness battle; any other kind of battle, they'll win.

>>How would India have liked it if the Chinese has hosted a Kashmiri government in exile?

Consistency is dismissed by Indians as a hobgoblin of small minds...so, we are that only...

>>Sometimes the lack of common sense of India beats all known human records.

If it were ONLY sometimes, the country would be much further ahead.

>>The Western powers, meanwhile, are laughing all the way to the bank at the expense of India.

I doubt it.

>>India's oxen dull-wittedness has saved THEM from a very embarassing position. Their economic relations with China remain excellent.

If we sell them more shit than the Chinese and buy their debt, they'd be sniffing around us.

>>All they need do is make the occasional cheap tearful gesture of sympathy for the Dalai Lama. It costs them nothing.

You don't know about all their women whose hearts go aflutter and whose undergarments go moist as Richard Gere speaks up for the Dalai Lama. And those women vote!

>>They don't have to face the dilemma of giving him asylum and risking China's rage. India, poor witless India, has rushed in to undertake that thankless role and collect the undying hatred and lethal machinations of Beijing - at deadly and increasing cost to India.

Have you double Ph.Ds in self-pity?

>>The bitter irony of it all is that the Dalai Lama and his followers would all have been far far happier in comfortable Western countries like the USA or Canada - so much better for them than sweltering poor India.

Dalai Lama has renunciated all desires...except the one for for his homeland.

>>India couyld do them an enormous favour by asking them to leave.

Hardly. Its one piece that might come in handy in a diplomatic chess game.

>>India has certainly done far more for the Lama than he ever deserved: half-a-century of refuge at incalculable cost to itself in terms of courting Chinese hostility.

Like being obsequious second banana to the Chinese will earn us any respect or influence with them!

>>If he cared even a bit for India, he would have offered to leave himself.

He probably is enormously grateful to India for his refuge and diplomatic support.

>>India doesn't do a thing to help the Kashmiri Pandits or Hindu refugees from Pakistan or Bangladesh.

You mean other than jail them like in Ramchand-Pakistan?

>>Why on earth should it go to such dangerous lengths for Tibetans?

I presume 99% of the motivation from comes the humiliation received in the '62 war.
Augustus AAA
Pune, India
Nov 10, 2009 06:54 PM
21
DINESH:

Isn't Chinese rule better for Hindus than Congress collusion with Islamists and the BJP's abject cowardice?
Momeen Rashid
Delhi, India
Nov 10, 2009 03:33 PM
20
Instead of responding properly to the Chinese threat, Nirupama Rao comes up with officialese which is not only dull and boring but surely makes China happy that Indian bureaucrats cannot even defend their country's borders.
Dinesh Kumar
Chandigarh, India
Nov 10, 2009 04:20 AM
19
Yesterday nine leaders of the Islamuic Uighur rebellion in China were shot.

That is what Chinese rule means: the short way with Islamist extremism.

Is Chinese rule then the answer to Congress Islamist opportunism and BJP cowardice?
Momeen Rashid
Delhi, India
Nov 10, 2009 02:51 AM
18
AUGUSTUS AAA:

Don't you agree that the Indians committed an incredibly stupid folly by allowing the Dalai Lama to set up his so-called government in exile in India?

No wonder the Chinese are bitter about India.

How would India have liked it if the Chinese has hosted a Kashmiri government in exile?

Sometimes the lack of common sense of India beats all known human records. I don't want to say more for fear of the Moderator.

The Western powers, meanwhile, are laughing all the way to the bank at the expense of India. India's oxen dull-wittedness has saved THEM from a very embarassing position. Their economic relations with China remain excellent. All they need do is make the occasional cheap tearful gesture of sympathy for the Dalai Lama. It costs them nothing. They don't have to face the dilemma of giving him asylum and risking China's rage. India, poor witless India, has rushed in to undertake that thankless role and collect the undying hatred and lethal machinations of Beijing - at deadly and increasing cost to India.

The bitter irony of it all is that the Dalai Lama and his followers would all have been far far happier in comfortable Western countries like the USA or Canada - so much better for them than sweltering poor India. India couyld do them an enormous favour by asking them to leave.

India has certainly done far more for the Lama than he ever deserved: half-a-century of refuge at incalculable cost to itself in terms of courting Chinese hostility. If he cared even a bit for India, he would have offered to leave himself.

India doesn't do a thing to help the Kashmiri Pandits or Hindu refugees from Pakistan or Bangladesh. Why on earth should it go to such dangerous lengths for Tibetans?

What clowns !!!!
Momeen Rashid
Delhi, India
Nov 09, 2009 09:40 PM
17
I hope the title of the article is the work of someone at Outlook rather than how the Foreign Sec'y thinks. In truth, the relationship is both cooperation AND conflict.
Augustus AAA
Pune, India
Nov 09, 2009 05:22 AM
16
Senthamarai:

If either Tamils or sinhalas are all of your type, they fully deserve all that happens to them. I hope you stew.
Momeen Rashid
Delhi, India
Nov 09, 2009 05:21 AM
15
One simple step to improve Indian relations with China:

ask the Dalai Lama to leave India and go to the US or elsewhere. India has done more than enough for him.
Momeen Rashid
Delhi, India
Nov 08, 2009 12:58 PM
14
However good the Chinese may appear on the face, India must always be on the alert, keeping in view the NIGHTMARE of 1962. The conciliatory tone of China was prompted as a result of strong reaction by India, in the Arunachal Pradesh issue. India must take tough posture and must not make timid or meek statements. China is well aware that India presently cannot be under-estimated as a nation and has to be reckoned with as an emerging force in the international arena. Any miscalculated move by China will not only destabilize South-East Asia, but, will also change global equation
ANOOPAM MODAK
DELHI, India
Nov 07, 2009 08:47 PM
13
Is Nirupama Rao is our shrap forgein secracity or crudulous idiot? She was our ambasidor of China, when Tibetians demonstrated against China last year Chinese government very badly treated her have she forget that insult?How can government appointed this halfheaded woman as our forgin sacracty?In1962 China made us fool,how we blindly believe these kind of enemy?
Ramesh Raghuvanshi
pune, India
Nov 07, 2009 04:14 AM
12
Hi senthamarai

I can understand your sentiments and am only concerned about the Tamils who are on the mercy of the Sri Lankan government. For them, in my opinion, autonomy is the best option within the framework of Sri Lanka. Their dream of a Tamil Elam will be a perpetual mirage. I don’t intend to have an ongoing wrangle with you on this matter. Only I have to stress the word ‘minority’. In other words, minority Tamils in a majority dominated Sinhalese in Sri Lanka achieving independence from Sri Lanka is an onerous and impossible task. After the demise of the LTTE, who is going to take them to the promised land-Elam? Will the Sri Lankan government allow another group to come up to lead the Tamils? People who have suffered the most are the Tamils. Shouldn’t a negotiated outcome with the Sri Lankan government be the best option for the aggrieved Tamils? Shouldn’t it be practical?
Scaria Varghese
Melbourne, Australia
Nov 06, 2009 11:52 PM
11
Scaria Varghese,
thanks for your interest on 'nothing'

>> The logic behind your argument for self-determination for the Tamils in Sri Lanka is a fallacy.

Why? and how is it a fallacy when compared to independence struggle many other countries (including India)?

>> your logic of India supporting majority nation (Sinhala) against minority nation (Tamil) is beyond belief.

My logic is supported by the facts of 60 years of Indian outright support to sinhala state and total betrayal of Tamils. whereas you beyond belief is supported by your rampant ignorance

>> No country would allow minority citizenry of that country to have a separate nation in that country.

Wrong on many counts. Usage of word 'minority citizenry' to describe Tamils is mischievous. Tamils are a minority nation in an artifical nation state of SL. They are NOT like the Indian minorities such as Indian muslims/christians who form a vertical nation (at the best) in a given geographical setting with very less possibility of defining/acquiring a separate sovereignty from within their participating society itself.
Secondly, many rational, liberal and humane countries have allowed secession through self-determination for their minority nations.

>>Even India wouldn’t----
This is called state terrorism and fascism. Tell me who is India? who gave authority to other Indians to force what kashmiris should or should not do?

>> As a rule, India or, that matter, any other country wouldn’t interfere in the internal affairs of another sovereign country and hector it what should be done there.

Wrong again, your statement is due to your naivety of
understanding the diplomacy. India is the DADA of the South Asia. Only country which has strategic and tactical independence from South Block's diktats is Pakistan. So I do not what you are talking about?

>> Rajiv Gandhi was very naive to send Indian army to help sort out the internal Sri Lankan problem

If he had not fallen into JR's trap of sending Indian army, Tamils would have achieved independence long ago on their own.

>> and he had paid a very heavy price for his folly: assassination.

It is sad that he is assassinated and had been made a hero. Instead it would have been better if he had been disgraced and legally hanged for his war crimes against tamils in SL.

>> The best outcome for the Tamils in Sri Lanka should have been autonomous states in Sri Lanka in the regions where they are predominantly harbouring.

Who are you to decide that. It is Tamils' and Tamils'
prerogative only. Your position should be based ethical, moral, humane, consistent and just considerations (which I believe will naturally lead to Tamils' SELF-DETERMINATION).

>> To this end, the UN should have been involved from the outset to broker a peace deal between the Sri Lankan government and the aggrieved Tamils to have the desired outcome: autonomy.

Do not give jitters to South Block. Once internationalized, India will have no absolute say in this matter and next stop for UN team will be kashmir

>> It is not too late and India government, with other likeminded governments, should take the initiative to put pressure on the Sri Lankan government to allow autonomy for the Tamils in Sri Lanka.

Are you really that naive? Just because mallu b*stards are at the helm does not mean you should be totally uncritical about India's involvement. It is India who spearheaded this round of genocide of Tamils. Poor sinhala conscripts became the fodder for this Indian game of eliminating LTTE. Rest assured if Gota is indicted he is going to bring down Sonia, Pranab, M.K and M.K

Indian establishment is cocky and self-assured about the loyalty of sinhala state, because

India 'believes' that (1) Sinhalas are not stupid enough to antagonise Indians again by striking explicit military bonds with Indian enemies (2) If India and China are going to be enemies and are going to fight direct and proxy wars, SL is least of South Block's concern since there are far more important and crucial geo-settings (than India's South and Indian ocean sealanes) (3) India can easily compete with china for gaining financial and cultural space in SL. (4) Any Indian missteps can be easily reversed. (5) Even in future, Tamils can be used as a bargaining chip to establish Indian hegemony in the island as Indira/Rajiv did.

The major problem with this strategy is that its assumptions. Some of them are, (0) except for few lackeys, Tamils will have stomach for Indian designs and will be stupid enough to believe Indians again (1) china will continue to remain rational in its approach to India. (2) Indian sub-nations will not come of the age and look at their nation in different light. (3) Western world will remain neo-liberal capitalists so that they can be co-opted for fascism of Indian state. (4) Muslim world will give a free pass to India....

Which means there are multiple fronts to fight against to sustain imperial Indian nation. The only strength both North and South block has in this fight is the ignorance of people like you. So they would rather keep people like you to stay where you are than question the motives of their actions.
Senthamarai
Chennai, India
Nov 06, 2009 11:06 PM
10
senthamarai
...............

i assume that you do not understand what fascism is all about.

aaa fascism was founded by mussolini in italy in the
1930,s.

it believes in the principle of a single nation of the
same ethnic origin

bbb it believes in the supreme leadership principle

in italy,s case it was mussolini.

in germany the supreme leader was adolf hitler

in spain it was franco the el caudillo

in pakistan it was qaide azam
gayatri devi
delhi, India
Nov 06, 2009 10:01 PM
9
You are correct Shan,
Indian fascist establishment already did maximum that it can do on kashmiris using the same protocols that it used in the genocide of Tamils to that of Kashmiris or NE. Reasons for no similar bloodshed are,

1) Kashmiris have support of Pakistanis which will use all its diplomatic, soverign, military and economic might at India in international fora if India tries to physically eliminate the support base (as it do the eelam tamils)

2) NE fighters at least have a sanctuary in Burma/Bangladesh to at least escape the Indian state's vengeful fascist wrath. Unlike kashmir, India does not need million soliders to repress these extremely minuscule population.

Every wrong move by India will be pounced on by pakistan to use it against India for the separation of Kashmir from it.

The motive behind indian state's support of Sinhala state and concept of united SL is simple. India wants to support the majority sinhala so that the returns will be maximum. In the process they can also accrue Tamil nation if SL stay as a unitary nation.

This is the reason why new delhi is always bending backwards to pander to sinhala racism. In other words, even if LTTE successfully created a nation recognised by others in the world, India would have still supported Sinhalese and would have encouraged them to take over Tamil areas.

Post-rajiv eelam Tamils committed grave mistake of hoping to change mind of India state and help them.

In mid-90s they should have tried to strike strong alliance with China/Pakistan+sub-national freedom fighters in India. This would have given some fluidity and bargaining power to LTTE vis-a-vis India. Now it is too late
Senthamarai
Chennai, India
Nov 06, 2009 05:03 PM
8
Quote :- >>The comprehensive defeat of the LTTE in Sri Lanka provides the country with a historic opportunity to ensure a future free from terrorism and conflict. We support a lasting political settlement in Sri Lanka that meets the political aspirations of all communities through the effective devolution of power<<

Recent realignment of partnerships in the subcontinent, India, under the pretext / disguise of national interest and security, had successfully field-tested and monitored the effectiveness, the world opinion and side-effects, with the wholehearted covert and overt support of Mr. Karuna’s DMK TN Municipality, of its prototype (Lankan Solution) strategy of ‘Annihilation seeming Threats’ on Eelam Nationalism – i.e. Genocide – an apparent success of Genocide because Factors advantageous to the successful accomplishment of ‘Genocide’ have been (01) the chosen target was soft, (02) targets’ isolation and the remoteness of geographic location enabling silencing news media and (03) effective usage of high flying banners of ‘War on Terror’ & ‘Terrorism against Democracy’.
Perhaps the success of the prototype, ‘Lankan Solution’, has emboldened the National Security Council (NSC) and is delicately underlined by the first sentence and employing it in the troubles boiling areas in the northern flank. Mother-India is not stupid. India will have to think twice, over and over and again and again, before using this much tempted enticing prototype because the targets in the North and Northeast are neither soft nor helpless or orphans, currently developed partnership - with the rivals – against the Eelam Tamils can not be taken for granted - guaranteed forever in all scenarios. Unless India creates or finds some like-minded strong autocratic vampires and karunas, likes of Rams and DMKs in the North and deploying refined and refreshed mentality of RAW. There should be someone (Strong) with India as she stood and still stands with Lanka. Farook Abdullahs or Dorji Khandus will never be the duplicates of Karuna of TN since they are not from Andhra Pradesh as Mr. karruna did. It will be very difficult to find still never be possible or an easy task for India because such karunas, Balus and Kovans live only in TN.
Second sentence is meaningless – same 25 year old scratched record. Not all communities in Lanka have political aspirations unless someone creates. If they have any they too will struggle for such aspirations. Only the Eelam Tamils are struggling for their aspirations because their basic existence and security political legitimacy have been denied – because they don’t want to be get assimilated. Therefore, no question of any sort is arising as regard to ‘Meeting Political Aspirations of all communities’. May God bless Mother-India!
Shan
Jaffna, Sri Lanka
Nov 06, 2009 10:21 AM
7
Hi SENTHAMARAI

It is interesting to read your blog that contained full of sound and fury towards Indian political establishment and it signified nothing. The logic behind your argument for self-determination for the Tamils in Sri Lanka is a fallacy. Again, your logic of India supporting majority nation (Sinhala) against minority nation (Tamil) is beyond belief. No country would allow minority citizenry of that country to have a separate nation in that country. Even India wouldn’t allow Kashmiri separatists’ demand for rescinding ties with India and the creation of Independent Kashmiri Nation.

Yours is a utopian idea and it could only have been achieved by India militarily taking over Sri Lanka and creating a separate state for the Tamils in Sri Lanka. As a rule, India or, that matter, any other country wouldn’t interfere in the internal affairs of another sovereign country and hector it what should be done there. We are witnessing the American folly of interfering in Iraq and the resultant disastrous consequences. Rajiv Gandhi was very naive to send Indian army to help sort out the internal Sri Lankan problem and he had paid a very heavy price for his folly: assassination.

The best outcome for the Tamils in Sri Lanka should have been autonomous states in Sri Lanka in the regions where they are predominantly harbouring. To this end, the UN should have been involved from the outset to broker a peace deal between the Sri Lankan government and the aggrieved Tamils to have the desired outcome: autonomy.

In the end it is a very tragic outcome for the Tamils in Sri Lanka. After having eliminated the LTTE, the Sri Lankan government has become emboldened and the Tamils are on their mercy. It is not too late and India government, with other likeminded governments, should take the initiative to put pressure on the Sri Lankan government to allow autonomy for the Tamils in Sri Lanka.
Scaria Varghese
Melbourne, Australia
Nov 06, 2009 04:43 AM
6
ANWAAR is off the mark in regard to the reason why South asian countries appear to be friendly to China but quarrel very often with India.

It is the kindly uncle syndrome. The uncle family members have least hesitation in picking on is the one known to be soft. They treat with nervous respect the harsh uncle, by contrast.

India is the soft uncle. All the other South asian countries have ruling elites that cement their power by stirring up hostility to India. India rarely hits back. So they don't fear it.

With China it is the exact opposite.

Paradoxically, if India acquired a tough guy image, its neighbours will suddenly treat it with respect.
Momeen Rashid
Delhi, India
Nov 06, 2009 03:30 AM
5
Senthamarai,

>> How can India be aggressively friendly to Burma, and SL when they repress their own minority population much worse than the Indian muslims go through?

So does China.

>> Lack of even a whimper from Indian-muslim community during the whole recent episode of Tamil massacres...

Indian Muslims have a very narrow focus. Neither Hindus nor Muslims spoke up for SL Tamils. It is a shame.
Anwaar
Dallas, United States
Nov 06, 2009 01:53 AM
4
Anwaar,

>> China has been a lot more aggressive than India in developing friendly ties with our subcontinental neighbors.

Shows your moral decreptitude at the altar of Indian muslims' interests. How can India be aggressively friendly to Burma, and SL when they repress their own minority population much worse than the Indian muslims go through? China has been developing these ties by cherry picking the powerful communities and majoritarian populace for their support (kinda of betting on definitely winning horse!). Under the same logic, Tamils should have en-masse support BJP and modi's pograms since BJPs/Modis/Thackerays are the only one to show some support at national level to Tamils.

Lack of even a whimper from Indian-muslim community during the whole recent episode of Tamil massacres when compared to the million-strong muslims participating in a rally in New Delhi against george bush visit to India only goes to show that (like CPM-brahmins) Indian muslims leadership too is highly self-centered and untrustabe by nature. Compare this with Tamil enthusiasts and Tamil nationalists crusading against Hindu-right in every available form and forum in solidarity with oppressed Muslims despite BJP et. al being their closest ally in the current political situation.

Shame on you
Senthamarai
Chennai, India
Nov 05, 2009 10:48 PM
3
This Nirupama Menon is an important part of the National Malayali war criminals' cabal who sold out Indian interests in Srilanka to china due to their utter stupidity of supporting majority nation (Sinhala) against minority nation (Tamil). In the process, they have thoroughly disenchanted generations of Tamil youths in TN away from the concept of Indian nation (especially those educated and web-savvy Tamils who can easily see through the false propaganda of Indian media+State).

I will have NO faith or interest in sustaining an Indian nation until the war criminals from first-family (incumbent PM:Sonia, PM in waiting:Rahul, Princess on the sidelines:Priyanka, dead king:Rajiv) and their sycophantic dogs (PC, MK, George, Pranab, JN Dixit, SS Menon and Nirupama Menon) are charged with crimes against humanity and brought to justice. Further Indian foreign policy should recognise the Tamils' fundamental right to independent homeland and SELF-DETERMINATION. Indian internal policies should recognise various sub-national movements and their aspirations and work towards a peaceful resolution WITH OUT use of army/police at any time.

>> SAARC

SAARC is a dead meat as long as South Block considers it as a easier vehicle to cement its hegemony in South Asia. Pakistan, Bangaladesh and Nepal view SAARC as a tool of Indian Foreign policy. SL showed interest in SAARC as long as it gets Indian approval and help in its racist genocide against Tamils (as well as for one-sided import relaxations from India). Now that utility of India is almost over (except to shield away from Western nations) SL is looking SAARC as extension of South Block and is refusing reciprocate trade concessions and stalls trade treaties.

>> building a stable, peaceful, vibrant and economically prosperous South Asia.

Fascists and war criminals in south block are in the process of achieving this by presiding over biggest man slaughters and genocides to prop majoritarian, racist and repressive regimes in South Asia.

India needs to be deconstructed as an imperial nation using which and who ever's help
Senthamarai
Chennai, India
Nov 05, 2009 12:14 PM
2
China has been a lot more aggressive than India in developing friendly ties with our subcontinental neighbors. It has in effect usurped the role that rightfully should belong to India. Our foreign policy should aim to reverse this trend.
Anwaar
Dallas, United States
Nov 05, 2009 06:14 AM
1
India must not fall into the same hole that the USA has dug itself into regarding China. This means getting neither too friendly ( to go along with the US business community ) or too aggressive ( to join rank w/ the growing anto - Chinese sentiments in the US ).
Gau_Rav1
nowhereland, Japan
COLLAPSE COMMENTS   
Post a Comment
You are not logged in, please log in or register
ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISING RATES | COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER | COMMENTS POLICY