Target right: Bihar, UP among the worst
Women: Maternal Mortality
Expecting Hope
Bangladesh offers India a healthcare lesson
Lifestart

  • The maternal mortality rate (MMR) in India is 254 per 1 lakh live births (2004-2006), down from 301 in 2001-2003
  • India has set itself an MMR target of 109 by 2015, which Unicef says the country will not be able to achieve
  • India wants to see how Bangladesh brought down MMR
  • Indian health officials will travel to Bangladesh to study that country’s intervention models

***

Despite efforts by the government to arrest the alarming maternal mortality rate (MMR) in India, progress has been very slow in the past few years. Outlook has now learnt the government is considering taking a leaf out of Bangladesh’s efforts at containing maternal mortality. India’s MMR is currently 254 per one lakh live births; the target is to take that figure to 109 by 2015. Unicef’s ‘The State of the World’s Children’ report released this year estimated that “78,000 women die from pregnancy and childbirth” every year in India and that the country was unlikely to achieve the 2015 target.

Amit Mohan Prasad, joint secretary in the Union ministry of health & family welfare, says, “The latest figures have shown that our MMR, which was 301 in 2001-03, has come down to 254 in the 2004-06 period. This is largely due to the success of Janani Suraksha Yojna (JSY), which is being seen as a success internationally.” The JSY, which falls under the umbrella of the National Rural Health Mission (NHRM), covers all pregnant women belonging to households below the poverty line and above 19 years of age for up to two live births. JSY integrates ante-natal care, institutional delivery with cash incentives and post-delivery care. “We are open to learning and exchanging ideas,” says Prasad. “Many countries want to adapt some of our intervention methods and we don’t mind studying theirs.”

In Bangladesh, the Australian Aid Programme in 2008-09 achieved positive results in decreasing maternal mortality rates in a pilot project. A 13 per cent decrease in MMR was achieved, from 254 per one lakh live births in 2007 to 221 in 2008 (compared to the national rate of 320). This is seen as a giant leap in checking MMR in Bangladesh. Indian health ministry officials will be travelling to Dhaka to study Bangladesh’s initiative in detail to implement them back at home. “Bangladesh has had very intensified efforts in the areas that record high MMR. Results only come from the betterment of the overall medical system. And since their health system is weaker than ours, we want to study the few things that caused this positive outcome and hopefully implement it,” says a health official.

In India, efforts have focused on increasing the number of institutional deliveries in rural areas, spreading awareness on contraception and family planning and mobilising more skilled health workers. But it’s the cash incentives to delivering a baby in a hospital that have brought more women to hospitals. Prasad insists that since the project only started in 2005, the full results will only show in the next assessment. However, he did not want to comment on the chances of India failing to achieve its 2015 target.

For India, another struggle is against the huge gaps in the healthcare system from state to state. Two-thirds of all the maternal deaths in the country occur in Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Bihar, Jharkand, Orissa, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Rajasthan and Assam. In these states, the administration of schemes has largely failed. Nepal, on the other hand, has made a giant leap, bringing down MMR from 540 to 280. This is being seen as a result of the legalisation of abortion in 2002. Also, Sri Lanka has the lowest MMR in South Asia at just 27 in 2002. A well-connected maternal healthcare system and a large number of institutional deliveries have led to these results. India could take a few tips from these countries too.

 
Daily Mail
COLLAPSE COMMENTS :
HAVE YOUR SAY
Oct 30, 2009 12:03 AM
5
Sri Lanka's maternal health services have done a wonderful job bringing down the maternal mortality rate to 27 per lakh live births. Materna health and child welfare services seem to work best when organized to cover smaller populations, not at state levels but at district levels, with regular gathering, publication and collation of data on results.
Anwaar
Dallas, United States
Oct 27, 2009 12:48 AM
4
Beti Bachao abhiyaan of Gujarat has reported sepctacular success.. You see it's nto crime to get leads from Gujarat government.. govt of India need not even advertise that they took leads from Gujarat govt..
Anil Kumar
Toronto, Canada
Oct 26, 2009 02:50 PM
3
Hundreds of postings about Wendy Doniger's trite attack on Rama.

Just a couple of postings on this heartbreaking, crucial matter: infant and maternity health in India which is catastrophic.

That says it all about India priorities.
Momeen Rashid
Delhi, India
Oct 25, 2009 11:41 AM
2
Congratulations to the women organisations that have brought the required publicity for women health issues.

This has been made possible by the decades of hyper coverage of sensitive women issues such as cancer, rape etc. This has lead to hypersensitivity to these issues in society and the sympathy generated towards women in general has paid off in other ways.

Unfortunately though, this shrewdness is lacking in the scarcely existent male rights groups and must be learnt from women groups not only to bring notice to men health issues ranging from heart attacks to inhuman judicial indictments.

For example,

Statistics show that in the UK ( where the study was done ), an equal number of
men die of prostate cancer! But it is unfortunate that little is being done to
proportionately increase its awareness or early diagnosis. Health care funding
for male causes is proportionately far less than the prevalence of the disease.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/low/health/351518.stm

" more men died of cancer than women in 1998 - there were 37,150 deaths from
cancer in men under 75 compared to 30,387 in women " ....
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/low/health/663688.stm
Partha persistent spammer
chennai, India
Oct 24, 2009 11:10 PM
1
To start with, there must at least be a govt, but sadly, there is no govt to speak of- not at the local level, or the state level and especially at the federal level.
The pompous netas with delusions of grandeur, with their zesty feel-good chest-thumping, rant-on about becoming a super-power, despite the fact, that theirs is a primitive, backward, underdevloped poverty-stricken land of filth and squalor with more than half of all the world's starving and undernourished, with no access to the very basics- education, healthacre, housing, water, electricity......the list is endless.
On every index of development, this land is a total failure! Even poorer and more 'backward' nations have been able to institute health/social programs to alleviate the suffering of the masses, but not this stinking land- the avaricious netas only concern is pelf- to loot the exchecquer and enrich themselves as quickly as possible- the deaths of millions of women and children from starvation and preventable illnesses are of no interest to these despicable, villainous cretins.
Bodh
Springfield, United States
COLLAPSE COMMENTS   
Post a Comment
You are not logged in, please log in or register
ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISING RATES | COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER | COMMENTS POLICY