KPN
First season: Bangalore Royal Challengers cheerleaders on MG Road
cricket: ipl
How To Build A Raging Fire
The Slumdog Millionaire author tours IPL-2's base, superstructure, and floats a few wacky trial balloons
cricket: ipl
The positives in IPL 2.0's favour are too numerous for them to slip on a bit of dew on the outfield
Julia Beffon
'The Heat is Coming', screams a full-page ad from my Pretoria newspaper. The copywriter was being too conservative. The heat is not coming, it is already on. South Africa is in the grip of IPL mania. The roads are dotted with billboards reminding you of South Africa's upcoming elections (on April 22) and the imminent second edition of the Indian Premier League which is being staged at eight venues here from April 18 until May 24.
 
 
The choice of South Africa, with its weather, time zone and spectators, has been a wise one. Add to this an aggressive marketing blitz.
 
 
At every gathering that I go to, the talk invariably turns to cricket's shiny new spectacle. It is difficult to pick up a magazine which does not have a mention of IPL commissioner Lalit Modi. Listeners recently jammed a popular radio talk show expressing their excitement and enthusiasm at being able to watch the world's best cricketers and some of India's biggest film stars. The TV coverage of the recent South Africa-Australia ODI matches had liberal doses of Preity Zinta, Akshay Kumar and Shane Warne. In fact, the host of Bollywood celebrities who have descended upon South Africa, and the daily mention of the millions and billions being spent and likely to be made by IPL-2, made a wag remark that it seems less like a cricket competition and more like a particularly corpulent Big Fat Indian Wedding!

When Twenty20 cricket first burst on the scene in 2003, it was dismissed by critics as the ODI's country cousin, a brash, arrogant youngster, high on style and low on substance. But the pre-game entertainment, the cheerleaders and the razzmatazz, and the feast of sixes and fours managed to pull in the crowds. The first Twenty20 match, held at Lord's in July 2004, set the record for the largest attendance for any county game other than a one-day final since 1953.

The reason is not difficult to fathom. Twenty20 is cricket on speed. In an era of hectic lifestyles and falling attention spans, it gives spectators more drama and intensity in three hours that they would get from a whole-day match. And even though it is a heady cocktail of money, entertainment and media, at its core it is cricket. It requires the same skills and expertise that are needed for success in the One-day and Test versions of the game, in fact even more so. It is an unforgiving format which requires perfect chemistry between technique and innovation and leaves no room for complacency or error. That is why T20 is also a great equaliser. Even a relatively inexperienced team can pull off an upset because just a couple of overs can change the entire balance of the game.

Just as T20 revolutionised domestic cricket in England, creating a new fan base, IPL has transformed international cricket, creating a new cult around itself. Its success lies in taking cricket professionalism to its very limits by transplanting a franchise model imported from Europe and the US into India. You now have the best players in the world playing not according to nationality but according to market forces in the world's most lucrative cricket arena, the Indian domestic league.

India may be the soul of world cricket, but IPL is its commercial heart. Just as Who Wants to be a Millionaire changed the ground rules for quiz shows by injecting a massive dose of money into the equation, IPL has changed the dynamics of the cricket economy.

 
 
I suggest a WWE-style cricket soap opera, that of pre-scripted matches, to sustain interest once the current novelty wears off.
 
 
At modest estimates, IPL involves a total of approximately $2.5 billion in terms of overall revenue. Its detractors felt league cricket in India would not be able to sustain such massive amounts, but IPL's opening edition took India by storm and showed that a franchise-based model could be entrenched, and quite profitably too.

Will the second edition, now relocated to South Africa, be an equal success? If IPL was meant to promote loyalties based on cities, the move to situate it outside India defeats the very purpose of the tournament. However, there is too much riding on the success of IPL-2 for it to be allowed to fail. In fact, it may well see an enhancement of its support base. The choice of South Africa was a smart one. The rains have gone and the autumn-like weather is tailor-made for cricket. South Africa is located in a convenient time zone for purposes of live viewing around the globe, not just in India. Most importantly, the spectators here are great cricket lovers and the T20 format is extremely popular. South African captain Graeme Smith was himself surprised at how many of his compatriots watched last year's inaugural IPL edition. Lalit Modi and his team are running an aggressive marketing campaign, helped by the familiarity of local audiences with Brand India and Bollywood. The organisers have sensibly decided to keep ticket prices reasonable, with the cheapest ones costing just 20 Rands (around Rs 100). A South African friend told me that he even expects the locals to start identifying with specific IPL teams. One newspaper has already recommended the Bangalore Royal Challengers as it has the maximum number of South African players. Local tie-ups, like the one Rajasthan Royals have done with the Cape Town-based Nashua Cape Cobras, will also allow IPL franchises to access the loyal fan base of South African domestic teams.

At the same time, there are some question marks as well. The spat between the IPL managers and suite-holders is a pointer to the kind of issues neither IPL nor Cricket SA thought through before sealing their deal. Suite-holders are corporate houses who pay an annual sum for keeping their hospitality boxes in stadiums. IPL's insistence on 'clean stadiums' meant that all suites were to be handed over to them in return for suite-holders being compensated with tickets in the grandstand and access to a hospitality tent. Some suite-holders reacted angrily to the offer by threatening to lock up their boxes during IPL matches.


Click here for large image

Even though that controversy appears to have been resolved, filling stadiums would be one of the biggest challenges facing IPL, which is aiming to sell over a million tickets for the 59-match carnival. Despite media reports that tickets for the opening IPL double-header in Cape Town were sold out within two hours of going on sale, a visit to the Computicket website reveals that tickets for all the games are still available. While weekend matches are likely to see strong attendance, the weekday matches, especially the ones beginning at 12.30 pm, may be difficult to sell. It all depends on how closely contested the first few games are and how fast the buzz spreads beyond the 1.5 million-strong Indian community, since the IPL will be competing with the English Premier League, which has exactly the same schedule as the IPL and commands a huge following in South Africa.

What does South Africa get out of all this? For one, a significant cash injection for Cricket SA and the local economy. Modi estimated that the IPL would consume 30,000 rooms in hotels and 10,000 airline tickets. The South African government is gearing up for a massive influx of spectators, journalists, players, franchises and their entourages. The IPL, thus, becomes a useful dry run, albeit on a smaller scale, for the fifa World Cup which South Africa is proudly hosting in 2010. The large number of strategic partnerships that the IPL has entered into with South African companies, ranging from Bukhara to hrg Rennis, shows that local businesses also see an opportunity of cashing in on the cricket bonanza. It is thus a win-win arrangement for all sides.

Beyond the money, the staging of the IPL in South Africa will catalyse the globalisation of cricket. Its success will attract new adherents to the game. There is already talk of an IPL-style tournament in the US and Canada.

So what next for cricket? Someone called the IPL 'TV's ultimate reality show'. But once the novelty of cricket's biggest reality show wears off, what 'new' entertainment can we provide viewers? I suggest a wwe-style cricket soap opera, a tournament of 'pre-scripted' matches, where you basically give audiences what they want. You want six sixes in an over? You get it, courtesy an obliging bowler. You want a double hat-trick in one match? Made possible by a posse of cooperative batsmen. You want a tie on the last ball? Delivered. The on-field pyrotechnics will be spiced up by off-field antics. You could have an episode in which a wicketkeeper's wife runs away with the tearaway fast bowler from the opposing team. The husband will naturally vow revenge. Then we can all gather in front of the TV and watch the next instalment of 'Bat, Ball aur Badla'. I bet it would give the Saas-Bahu serials a run for their money. Indian Cricket League, are you listening?


(Vikas Swarup is the author of Q & A, which was turned into the Oscar-winning Slumdog Millionaire. India's deputy high commissioner in South Africa, he writes here in his personal capacity.)

cricket: ipl
The positives in IPL 2.0's favour are too numerous for them to slip on a bit of dew on the outfield
Julia Beffon
Translate into:
 
Daily MailPublished
COLLAPSE COMMENTS :
HAVE YOUR SAY
Apr 18, 2009 12:00 AM
1
IPL is just a carrier for globalization of celebritydom.
Varun Garde
Bengaluru, India
Apr 18, 2009 12:00 AM
2
Mr. Garde,

Brian Lara has said that the Indian Cricket League and the Indian Premier League are proving to be wake-up calls for cricket boards as well as the ICC.

He has also said "I'm very happy to have played as many Tests as I have because I don't think it's ever going to be the same in the future"

The reality should be accepted. Cricket is passing through its transition. As we experienced such transitions in movies, electronic devices, vehicles etc. The only difference is its classical appeal in longer version won't be lost in a short-run.

Tests have also become result oriented only owing the evolution to its shorter forms. We want results rather than boring draws.

Celebrities are there. Who cares? Although a beautiful face is victorious everywhere; when a ball is delivered we just stare at the crease. Cute faces in the jam-packed stadium, cheerleaders, most coveted results, excitement - what else do you want?

We want exciting cricket, that's all. Globalization of celebrity dom? Let it be!
dip
Dhaka, Bangladesh
Apr 18, 2009 12:00 AM
3
Dip, You're right, narrowness of purpose needn't deprive any enterprise of fameor success. Chetan Bhagat is a living proof.
Varun Garde
Bengaluru, India
Apr 19, 2009 12:00 AM
4
I have interacted with many South Africans who have Indian origin. Most of them live in Johannesburg and Pretoria though. None of them were from Durban, the place where most indentured labourers from India settled down eventually. Much to my surprise, most of them felt insulted when I asked them if they were Indians! They felt indignant.
I was surprised by their revulsion when I tried to link them up with their Indian origin. They felt that I was demeaning them.
I doubt if these RSA nationals of Indian origin would be 1/10th as interested in seeing a match between KKR and Rajasthan Royals.

Sudhir Kumar Bisht
Delhi, India
Apr 21, 2009 12:00 AM
5
A dog interrupted the opening match of the IPL. Probably it sensed ( smelled, they still beat instruments and sensors in sniffing) that Vikas Swarup is the Deputy Ambassador of India in South Africa. You never know it must be protesting at how this ambassador allowed his Q&A to be mutated to Slumdog millionaire. This Pitchdog protester is the perfect allegory for Slumdog millionaire , which was a rudderless alteration of a text , written by a spineless, so called Deputy Ambassador of India
gajanan
Sydney, Australia
Apr 21, 2009 12:00 AM
6
"I suggest a wwe-style cricket soap opera, a tournament of ‘pre-scripted’ matches, where you basically give audiences what they want."

Wish we could extend such a freedom of choice to bad ideas as well - then we could vote Swarup's article out of outlook.
Varun Garde
Bengaluru, India
Apr 24, 2009 12:00 AM
7
The author's official status must have suppressed any apetite for a cost benefit comjparison between our elections and IPL-2 it drove out to South Africa! For starters, we found: Shane Warne leads better than Sonia Gandhi or Manmohan, Rahul Dravid, Sachin Tendulakarand Anil Kumble showed greater dcdediction than Deva Gouda and Sharad Pawar, Shilpa Shetty and SRK are not as helpless as the voters of India, the IPL umpires' neutrality have bigger credibility than Navin Chawla.... Therefore, over all, IPL-2 is more meaningful than...
,
KSC Nair
Indianapolis, United States
May 04, 2009 12:00 AM
8
Last year IPL runners up Chennai Super Kings have a fair chance of making it to the semi finals now.
If they win the IPL Final and the Cup this time , it would be sweet consolation.
Mort
Bombay, India
COLLAPSE COMMENTS   
Post a Comment
You are not logged in, please log in or register
ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISING RATES | COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER | COMMENTS POLICY