Tribute
Price Of Freedom
He was much more than a secretary to Gandhi. On various occasions he has been described as Gandhi's Boswell, a Plato to Gandhi's Socrates, as well as an Ananda to Gandhi's Buddha-- his relationship with Gandhi is a taxonomic puzzle.
Although increasingly receding from our public commemoration, Independence Day remains an occasion to recall the contributions and sacrifices of the many Indians who wrought for freedom. Central to the story of our struggle for freedom is the role of Gandhi and the working of a unique, non-violent revolution that changed the face of the world. Behind this success of Gandhi, lies an entire ecosystem of men and women of all hues and colours, of varying political predilections, and from diverse religious, class, caste and national groups. This 'Gandhian ecosystem', to coin a phrase, consisted of two broad 'kingdoms'. The first, and the well-studied part consists of Gandhi's political colleagues. The story of Gandhi's relationship with this diverse group consisting of persons like Nehru, Patel, Rajaji and several other politically prominent leaders is well documented. In contrast, the 'non-political' section of the Gandhian ecosystem has not received the attention that it deserves. Many of these individuals were described under the broad rubric of 'constructive workers'. The work of these individuals was not limited merely to end British rule in India. Rather, they were inspired to aim for the lofty ideal of Purna Swaraj that encapsulated Gandhi's civilisational mission of according autonomy and dignity to every individual.

While one may explain this neglect of the non-political part of the Gandhian ecosystem as a consequence of the modern intellectual preference of the political over the moral and social dimensions of life, it nevertheless results in a limited understanding of what Gandhi represented. Although the Mahatma was undoubtedly their leader, these colleagues and compatriots were ineffable to Gandhi's own personal evolution. Perhaps we can gauge the significance of such non-political figures in the Gandhian ecosystem by considering the fact that Gandhi broke his customary weekly silence on only two occasions in his eventful life. The first was when his nephew and creator of the khadi programme, Maganlal Gandhi, died in 1928. Years later when a compatriot had returned to Sevagram after a heart-attack, a distraught Gandhi broke his vow again. "How are you, Mahadev? " he enquired.

Those familiar with the name often know of Mahadev Desai as Gandhi's secretary. Some will in addition recognise him as the translator of the Mahatma's autobiography into English. However, as he was much more than a secretary to Gandhi, Mahadev Desai has on various occasions been described as Gandhi's Boswell, a Plato to Gandhi's Socrates, as well as an Ananda to Gandhi's Buddha. This profusion of analogies point to the fact that Mahadev Desai's relationship with Gandhi is a taxonomic puzzle. Undoubtedly he belonged to the non-political kingdom of the Gandhian ecosystem and was primus inter pares amongst the close circle from which Gandhi drew his material, psychological and moral sustenance. Nevertheless, these analogies are inadequate caricatures. To persist with our biological metaphor, while he was the tallest Gandhian, his originality, insightfulness, and creativity makes Mahadev Desai a species unto himself.

Mahadev Haribhai Desai was born on 1st January 1892 in Saras, a small village in the Surat district of Gujarat. An early fondness and flair for literature marked him out for a career in letters. By the time he earned his degrees in philosophy and law in 1913, Mahadev had read widely in both English and Gujarati and was preparing for a prosaic job. It was during this period that he met that great 'fisher of men', Mahatma Gandhi. By the end of 1917, after four years of tentative explorations, Mahadev Desai made a dramatic choice and threw in his lot with Gandhi. For someone on the verge of extricating his family from genteel poverty, this was a bold decision. Life with Gandhi, not yet the Mahatma, was going to be uncertain. But the sacrifice is made doubly magnificent by Mahadev's decision to sublimate his own life to serve the needs of Gandhi. It was his way of serving the cause of his people.

Life with Gandhi was maddeningly busy for Mahadev. In addition to attending to Gandhi's voluminous correspondence, carefully and faithfully reporting on Gandhi's work, Mahadev also regularly contributed to Gandhi's various journals. The man with a passion for literature now deployed his pen in the service of his leader's many causes. However, true to his integrity, Mahadev never allowed his work as Gandhi's secretary to come in the way of a daily regimen of hard physical labour that was the norm at Gandhi's ashrams. And, as if this was not enough, Mahadev played a decisive role in many a nationalist campaign, Bardoli being the most memorable. Carrying out all these tasks was no trifling matter and Mahadev pushed himself to the bodily and psychological limits of human endurance. However, the effort and strain seldom showed. Perhaps Mahadev was aided in handling the burden of his work by his singular traits of equanimity, refined sensibility and a great capacity of love that tempered his steely conviction. If being in the midst of major political campaigns and crises was demanding, Mahadev would also have needed to draw on his inner reserves in the normal course of things. Being the secretary to the most sought after person in India was no ordinary job and it also meant countless hours spent managing Gandhi's time by attending to his various visitors. Mahadev excelled in all such quotidian tasks. It would be no exaggeration to say that as significant as his contribution to the great events of the day was the simple fact that, as observed by a friend, Mahadev had "saved ten years of Gandhi's time by diverting from him unwanted visitors"!

The contribution of Mahadev Desai in the form of reports and articles on Gandhi's work is significant for they were a vital link between Gandhi and his people. Mahadev's linguistic felicity meant that he wrote regularly in the English, Gujarati, and Hindi versions of Gandhi's journals. It is through these writings that thousands learnt of the enduring meaning and value of the struggles and victories that animated Gandhi's public and private life. But on occasion we are afforded a glimpse of the literary promise and independence of mind that Mahadev held in taut abeyance. In 1936, he translated Jawaharlal Nehru's Autobiography into Gujarati for which Mahadev was assailed by criticism. On the one hand, he was castigated for helping promote a book in which Gandhi had been severely criticised and was also advocating a contrarian economic and social programme. On the other hand, the Socialists within the Congress, who considered Nehru to be their intellectual leading light, were suspicious that Mahadev would distort their leaders' message! Mahadev refused to be bogged down by such doctrinaire criticism and wrote a lengthy preface to accompany his translation. In it, he pointed to the philosophical differences between Gandhi and Nehru and laid out an objective assessment of the literary and substantive content of Nehru's work. While appreciative of the ideals that animated Nehru's life and his unshakeable resolve, Mahadev chided Nehru for his failure to understand the philosophical basis of the Indian ethos.

If Nehru lacked a serious appreciation of Indian philosophy, Mahadev's most enduring literary contribution lay in this philosophical tradition. In the manner of the seers of the past, he wrote a major commentary on the Bhagvad Gita. Intended as a short preface to his English translation of Gandhi's interpretation of the Gita, Anasaktiyoga, this exegesis eventually ran into 125 pages! In this major work of synthesis, Mahadev explores the relationship between the Gita and other foundational texts in various Indic traditions. While dwelling at length on such fundamental concepts in Indian philosophy as prakriti, purushartha, karma, buddhi, and jnana, Mahadev also demonstrated a serious comprehension of Western philosophy. The commentary itself borrows from a long series of letters exchanged with Gandhi during the year that Mahadev spent away from the Mahatma in Bardoli. Today, one wonders how it was possible for both to find time for such a sustained philosophical conversation while engaged in a major Satyagraha campaign that made a major dent in the colonial edifice in India. Above all, Mahadev's philosophical musings on the Gita remind us in our troubled times of the possibility of a non-doctrinaire and non-partisan study of ancient philosophical texts.

In the weeks preceding the Quit India Resolution, Mahadev, as usual had worn himself down and underwent a thorough medical examination. Preserved in an archival record, a medical report gives us the results of this physical and internal examination conducted on July 3, 1942 in Bombay. His haemogram was nearly perfect. He passed the glucose tolerance test without a problem, and his gastric system was functioning normally. In short, the physician and the pathologist could see no obvious problem with Mahadev's physical health. But this physical well-being belied the intense mental anguish that had gripped him.

While the furies of the 1942 campaign lay ahead, Gandhi had announced that he would undertake an indefinite fast in the event of his being arrested by the government. Soon, after the 'Quit India' Resolution was adopted, Gandhi and Mahadev were arrested and taken to Poona to be lodged at the palace of the Aga Khan. While the debate about Gandhi's fast raged inside and outside the Aga Khan Palace, Gandhi and his compatriots settled down into a daily routine in the jail expecting to be there for a really long time. By now, Mahadev was fully consumed by thoughts about the consequences of Gandhi's indefinite fast. Gandhi and Mahadev argued incessantly about the fast. Mahadev did not want the Mahatma to give up his life through a fast. Unlike previous occasions, both Mahadev and Gandhi understood that the government was not going to relent and an indefinite fast meant a certain death. But none could have foretold the cruel turn of events. On August 15, 1942, hours after he had served Gandhi and cheerfully groomed himself in front of one of the numerous mirrors in the building, Mahadev Desai died of a massive heart-attack.

In twenty-five years of public life, Mahadev had compressed the work of a lifetime. As Gandhi remarked, he was a living example of "the wise, who live and work as if they were born to immortality and everlasting youth". In faithfully following the dictum of 'Do or Die', Mahadev Desai had paid the ultimate price in winning India its freedom.

Postscript

In 1951, in a Foreword to D. G. Tendulkar's landmark eight-volume eponymous biography of the Mahatma, Jawaharlal Nehru remarked that "No man can write a real life of Gandhi, unless he is as big as Gandhi". In the normal course of events, it would have fallen to Mahadev Desai to execute this task. In recent times, as if in carrying out the unfulfilled duties of his father, Mahadev's son, Narayan Desai has written a four-volume biography of the Mahatma. While the release of its English translation is eagerly awaited, one is reminded of the suggestion of the anthropologist Verrier Elwin, that "it would be a very proper token of love for [Mahadev's] memory if everything he has written could be collected and republished". The Collected Works of Mahadev Desai will not only represent a nation's gratitude to one its finest sons, it will also be an invaluable historical record of the events of a quarter century that has defined modern India.

 
Daily Mail
COLLAPSE COMMENTS :
HAVE YOUR SAY
Aug 21, 2008 12:00 AM
17
>> Such ‘discrimination’ happens against bachelors, single girls, call centre executives, people with pets, non-vegetarians and many such groups.

Such a lame defense of shameful communalism!
Anwar Patel
Dallas Tx, United States
Aug 20, 2008 12:00 AM
16
SORRY OUTLOOK SEEMS DID NOT PUBLISH SHABANA'S STORY.
MY APPOLOGISES .
a k ghai
mumbai, India
Aug 20, 2008 12:00 AM
15
"This is endless whining and attention seeking by muslims, who just refuse to come out of the persecution complex and ‘victim’ mentality"

In my Society consiting of 20 there is one Muslim,three Christians,a few Gujraties and Marawaries.

Is Shabana living on footpaths ? Or nearly 20 lacs Muslism in Mumbai living on Foot-Paths ? Sharukh Khan,and other Muslims Heroes living on Foot Paths ?

I have couple of Muslims in our Company -all of them have purchased flats during last two years.They got home loans from Banks .

STRANGE OUTLOOK HAS PRINTED SUCH A BULLSHIT !

2. 'LETS CREATE A NAYA NAGAR

Embarrassed by the dubious distinction of harbouring numerous terror suspects, Naya Nagar residents launch a ‘clean-up‘ drive

What's common to the following names: Faisal Shaikh, Muzammil Ataur Rehman Shaikh, Abdul Rehman Syed alias Nasir, Syed Mohammed Hanif, Fahmida Mohammed, Tauqeer Subhan Qureshi?

In addition to being accused of conspiring to create terror in the country (see box inside) all these men are residents of an enclave called Nayanagar at Mira Road.

Embarrassed by this dubious distinction and fed-up of constant police raids other residents of the area have now initiated what they call a 'clean-up' drive. For instance, groups of volunteers from the colony have begun identifying homes where male members have been missing for long. Even if a family claims its male members are working abroad, the volunteers have begun independently verifying those claims.'

BETTER MUSLIMS THAN SHABANA.


http://www.mumbaimirror...08082002382412221944c97



a k ghai
mumbai, India
Aug 20, 2008 12:00 AM
14
‘Probably it is easier for a Muslim to become President of India than to get a flat in Mumbai!’

Loads of bullshit again!!

Such ‘discrimination’ happens against bachelors, single girls, call centre executives, people with pets, non-vegetarians and many such groups.

Flat owners or societies have their own reasons to say no to such groups.

When I checked last, Shabana has a flat in Mumbai, so does Saif. In fact, he bought an entire floor around 2 years back and had it renovated. Most societies in Mumbai have people from all communities. In my society, there are 4 muslim families out of 36.

This is endless whining and attention seeking by muslims, who just refuse to come out of the persecution complex and ‘victim’ mentality.
Kiran Bagachi
mumbai, India
Aug 20, 2008 12:00 AM
13
>> Probably it is easier for a Muslim to become President of India than to get a flat in Mumbai!

If Shabana's statement is to be taken at face value, it would mean that no Muslims own any house in Mumbai.

She might have a point though that she was denied a specific house just because of her religion. There, she might be right, and while sad, it is not unique to her case or her religion. A well known Hindu might find it difficult to purchase a house in a largely Muslim locality.

As for equal housing law like in US, Indian sensitivities are certainly different, and to transport the same law is just plain stupid. How can someone deny that lot of people shall rather leave their house empty (even if they could use the rent), than give it to someone who might consume meat (not to talk of beef) or alcohol or drugs there. Similarly, some Muslims might not want to rent their house to someone who might eat pork there.

Even in the US, lot of people shall not rent out their house to people who have pets, or shall charge a premium for it. The housing law allows such "discrimination". If any such law has to be brought in India, it has to be adapted to local tastes and sensibilities.
Al Bundy
San Francisco, United States
Aug 19, 2008 12:00 AM
12
Ashok,

>>>> "Probably it is easier for a Muslim to become President of India than to get a flat in Mumbai!"
>> Simply because, Muslim Presidents in India don't make bombs in flats they get to live!

The only ones caught making bombs in someone's house were the two bajrangis in Nanded in Maharashtra. The bomb accidentally exploded killing both of them. The house belonged to a sanghi.
Anwar Patel
Dallas Tx, United States
Aug 19, 2008 12:00 AM
11
something for shabana and other succulars to chew on..

a muslims only housing society !!


http://muslimhousingsociety.org/main/services.htm


Now all hindus can also shout discrimination .
lookout bug me not
mumbai, India
Aug 19, 2008 12:00 AM
10
>>Probably it is easier for a Muslim to become President of India than to get a flat in Mumbai!

To become the president of the Country , the majority of MPs have to vote for him / her. If there really is discrimination against a muslim, then they will not be voted for.

Abut housing, there are many muslims only housing societies in Mumbai & other parts of the country. Time for hindus also to shout discrimination ?

"In a case pleaded by Soli Sorabjee, former attorney general, on behalf of the Zoroastrian Co-operative Housing Society, the sc Bench challenged an earlier Gujarat High Court verdict that the society's byelaws restricting membership to non-Parsis was illegal. It ruled:

"It is open to the members of the Parsi community, who came together to form the co-operative society, to prescribe that members of the community for whose benefit the society was formed, alone could aspire to be the member of the society."

Supreme court of India sees nothing wrong in such practice.

This verdict has brought these ineluctable prejudices out in the open. Using it as a precedent, the argument subtly rumbling in housing societies is: 'If the Parsis can do it, why can't we?'"

http://www.mail-archive...amnet.org/msg00688.html
lookout bug me not
mumbai, India
Aug 19, 2008 12:00 AM
9
>> Typical "succular" idiot....

Not really. Probably it is easier for a Muslim to become President of India than to get a flat in Mumbai!
Anwar Patel
Dallas Tx, United States
Aug 19, 2008 12:00 AM
8
Shabana azmi on Indian muslims in 2006..She has taken a U turn again..

Typical "succular" idiot who does not know what she is talking about.

"CHARLIE ROSE: And we conclude from India with a conversation with actress and social activist Shabana Azmi. We met with her in Mumbai.

SHABANA AZMI, ACTOR: There is in India a feeling for the Muslim that in spite of all the anomalies, I have a stake and a space here. It`s possible for a poor Indian boy to think, my God, I can become like the president of India. I can become a film star like Shah Rukh Khan...

CHARLIE ROSE: That you are.

SHABANA AZMI: ... who is a Muslim -- Shah Rukh Khan, who is a Muslim. I can become....

CHARLIE ROSE: A billionaire like...

SHABANA AZMI: Azim Premji.

CHARLIE ROSE: ... Azim Premji.

SHABANA AZMI: Yes. Or Itzhan Partan (ph), who is this great cricketer. There is a space and a stake there. It works as a secular democracy, in spite of all the aberrations. It works.."


http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/WO0603/S00180.htm


Now will the real shaban azmi please stand up ?
lookout bug me not
mumbai, India
Aug 19, 2008 12:00 AM
7
Good article. Another example of the devotion that Gandhi inspired in people.
Anwar Patel
Dallas Tx, United States
Aug 18, 2008 12:00 AM
6
The very nice article is incomplete without the mention of the book " Diaries of Mahadev Desai".
These diaries chronicle the daily lives of Gandhiji and gives us an insight into the real human Mahatma.
Bhartendu Mehta
Manama, Bahrain
Aug 17, 2008 12:00 AM
5
Better yet - how about the 'Jawaharlal Nehru Crap House' - only that it's just a semi-enclosed shed with a hole in the dirt floor.
Bodh
Springfield, United States
Aug 17, 2008 12:00 AM
4
"Forgot to mention that anyone not related to the Nehru clan is never mentioned anywhere in the history"

And all the projects are named after Nehru, Indira and Rajiv. If the govt opens a public urinal, it will be named Jawaharlal Nehru public Urinal.
Ganesan
Nj, USA
Aug 17, 2008 12:00 AM
3
Ooops! Forgot to mention that anyone not related to the Nehru clan is never mentioned anywhere in the history of this wretched, god-forsaken land - no Kripalani, no Vallabhai Patel, no Bose... only Nehru and his evil progeny!
Bodh
Springfield, United States
Aug 17, 2008 12:00 AM
2
Jinnah made a deal with the Brits- he and his moslem compratiots would support Britain in their war against Hitler (while Gandhi was demanding that India be first given independence to participate as a free nation, in that war) in return for a Moslem nation called Pakistan, to be carved out of undivided India, which he got and then some- due to the arrogant, butt-licking Anglophile idiot Nehru, who was totally besotted with the Lady Edwina Mountbatten, who played him like a well tuned piano, so much so, that he never said no to anything Jinnah demanded, while Jinnah said NO, to everything Nehru asked for.
As for Infrastructure, railways, education ...it was NDA govt which took the bull by its horns and ushered in all this - mind you, all this in just one term in office, after 60 years of do-nothing useless Cong control of governaent !
MMS talks of .."after they took over"...Cong has been in control of India since day one after independence, yet did nothing but pauperize the nation even more.
Every reform of any significance to date, has been ushered in by the BJP-led NDA govt. Only stupid, brainless, ignoramus fools would fall for this puerile Cong clap-trap.
Bodh
Springfield, United States
Aug 15, 2008 12:00 AM
1
"While appreciative of the ideals that animated Nehru’s life and his unshakeable resolve, Mahadev chided Nehru for his failure to understand the philosophical basis of the Indian ethos."

It perhaps wasn't Mahadev's fault that he never chided Gandhi for his mix-up by equating Islam with a religion, not a political ideology. The fault lay squarely with Gandhi in failing to conflate the British colonialism with Islamic imperialism. Buddha and Ananda analogy is mystifying since Ananda was a witness to Buddha's peerless wisdom wherein he never interefered with his counsel with regard to duties of a king when His counsel was sought on security and political issues of Kosala and Magadha
Pal
Hong Kong, United States
COLLAPSE COMMENTS   
Post a Comment
You are not logged in, please log in or register
ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISING RATES | COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER | COMMENTS POLICY