A file photo of Binayak Sen with patients in Chattisgarh
binayak sen: investigation
Framed, Nailed, Hanged
The state's in denial; everyone else knows the truth about Binayak Sen
binayak sen: investigation
Solitary confinement and an arbitrary system fail to dispirit Binayak Sen. He lives on in hope.

"Dr Binayak Sen is certainly a doctor but a big zero in terms of actual practice of medicine."
—Official chargesheet



The greatest price for Dr Binayak Sen's incarceration on the trumped-up charge of being a Naxalite collaborator is being paid by people who this chargesheet says do not exist at all—his patients.
 
 
People are not aware of Sen's work. Under him, malaria cases went down by 80 per cent in seven years.
 
 
"In the search of his house, no material related to a doctor's clinic was found, there were no medicines," says the almost childishly crude chargesheet. But it's all there, a two-hour drive from the state capital, Raipur, in a village called Bhagram Nala. The clinic, the medicines, the testing equipment, the trained health workers, the medical records of patients who flocked here from a staggering 248 villages. And a community health programme that transformed the lives of its beneficiaries—protecting them, for example, against falciparum malaria, one of the deadliest diseases in this region—but is now tragically running itself into the ground because the doctor who gave it life is watching the days slip by in a barrack crammed with convicted prisoners in Raipur Central Jail.

In normal times, it would be self-evident that the "big zero" flagrantly scrawled across Sen's three decades of medical service to rural communities was a big lie. The fact that one of the country's best medical colleges, Sen's alma mater, Christian Medical College, Vellore, went out on a limb to support him through his ordeal—raising funds for his legal defence, launching signature campaigns, despatching books to him in prison, networking internationally on his behalf—should have nailed the lie. But it didn't. It was the accusation of being a courier for Naxalites that seemed to win the day, despite the flimsy evidence for it, as Sen's bail plea travelled through the legal system, and got rejected all the way from sessions court to Supreme Court (which dismissed it with a single sentence.)

Two health workers train in Sen's clinic

So, gradually and painfully, it has become clear, to a largely apolitical tribe of doctors who revere Sen as a role model, that these are not normal times. Especially not in the context of Chhattisgarh, where the claim of fighting the 'war' against Naxalites provides the police and intelligence apparatus wide cover for chilling human rights violations. These range from fake encounter deaths and the displacing of tens of thousands of tribals by the state-sponsored militia, Salwa Judum, to jailing professionals like Sen—who stuck out their necks and insisted on accountability—with the help of a draconian state law.

What has further dismayed the doctors is that Sen's strong, continuing involvement with the world of medicine has not come across vividly, over the past year, whether to judges hearing his bail applications or to a wider public. That it is, rather, the wild charges against him that have set the parameters for discussion, whether for those attacking him or for those defending him. That for all that has been written about him, few know the sheer number of hours he spent on medical work in Bhagram Nala and the Shaheed Hospital in Dalli Rajhara, the extent to which his wide network of patients depended on him, the level to which state health programmes have benefited from his creativity and wisdom. (Bizarrely, even as he is being demonised by the state police, ably assisted by a local media fed on police leaks, his ngo Rupantar, which played a seminal role in designing the state's Mitanin, or village health worker programme, is still getting government funds for training such workers.)

Most importantly, most people are only dimly aware, if at all, of the cost to the community of denying him bail and keeping him in jail, while the case against him is heard at a cripplingly—indeed criminally—slow pace, with only 6 out 85 prosecution witnesses examined in a so-called fast track court. Celebrated human rights lawyer Nandita Haksar, who has just taken charge of the campaign to free him on the request of several overworked doctors, eloquently drives home the point many of Sen's peers make: "Binayak's primary persona is of a doctor, he came to human rights as a doctor. Not allowing him to treat people, to practice his medicine—his requests to do so, even in jail, have been turned down—is a form of torture, and a disservice to the community."

Shocked that a year has slipped by with Sen still in jail, a newly-formed group, Doctors in Defence of Dr Binayak Sen, has finally decided to tell his story with the rigour it deserves. As part of this effort, doctors belonging to the Jan Swasthya Sansthan (JSS), a rural medical centre near Bilaspur (largely alumni of cmc, aiims and other prestigious medical institutions across the country) are scrutinising years of data to piece together what it really means to keep a doctor like him in jail. The full picture will come out in a report called "When does a doctor become a threat to the security of his country?" to be released at the end of his month—but even the glimpses made available to Outlook say a great deal.

Between 2004 and 2006, 54 patients were seen, on average, every week at Sen's Bhagram Nala clinic. In 2007, thanks to Sen being whisked away to jail mid-year, the figure plummeted to 9. Apart from treating acutely ill patients (those suffering from diarrhoea and malaria, for example), the clinic was providing care to 569 patients with chronic and long-standing diseases, including hypertension, asthma, TB, diabetes, heart disease and kidney disease. The most telling figure is Sen's success rate in controlling malaria through the community programme he ran—the date shows a fall of 80 per cent in the number of malaria episodes over seven years.

"It is remarkable," says Dr Yogesh Jain of JSS, "this is way beyond what we have achieved, which is not even 50 per cent. In the context of the National Anti-Malaria Programme, it is an unimaginable success rate." Today, as the doctors describe it, Sen's health workers, struggling to carry on his work, despite their limited capacity to do so, are devastated; his patients bewildered. "Why are all the people he looked after being punished?" asks Dr Anurag Bhargava. Says A.V. Ramani, a fellow cmc alumni: "When you set up base in a rural area it's because you have a certain faith in the system. How do rural doctors retain that faith, after what has happened to Binayak Sen?"

Gathered together in a living room in Bilaspur on the eve of the first anniversary of his incarceration, Sen's fellow doctors also spoke poignantly about a man who has for the last year been painted either in the lurid colours of a "Naxali dakiya" or in the monochrome tones of a victim of human rights oppression. They remembered the Binayak who shocked city-bred medical interns by briskly wiping up the mess left by a sick patient; the Binayak who grew a beard after the Babri Masjid demolition to understand what it felt like to be a Muslim—and rather enjoyed being called Maulanaji by strangers; Binayak the foodie, Binayak the enthusiastic singer of Brahmo hymns.... Inevitably, however, all their anecdotes, their laughter and their memories ended in a single question: when will his ordeal end?

binayak sen: investigation
Solitary confinement and an arbitrary system fail to dispirit Binayak Sen. He lives on in hope.
 
Daily MailPublished
COLLAPSE COMMENTS :
HAVE YOUR SAY
May 24, 2008 12:00 AM
64
Thank you so umuch for your informative and moving articles on Binayak Sen. His travails chalenge us in two directions: one, how can we enlarge the exploration among health professionals of Sen's example. Two, how do we make our system responsive to the kind of civic protests mounted, but so far ineffective, in such a case. We hope your journal will continue to explore these issues.
Dr. P. Zachariah
Hanover, Canada
May 24, 2008 12:00 AM
63
rajesh fron phoenix wrote -
In case of AIIMS director Venugopal, who was indicted for practicing blatant castiesm, Supreme court acted with lightning speed in delivering verdict in his and fellow upper caste anti-reservationist's favor.
In case of AIIMS director Venugopal, who was indicted for practicing blatant castiesm, Supreme court acted with lightning speed in delivering verdict in his and fellow upper caste anti-reservationist's favor.
On the other hand cases related to atrocities on SC/ST take years and in 95% of cases upper caste oppressors are acquitted
--------

You are a Pakistani passing yourself as Indian. you appear to be connecting two different issues. it appears you do not know what you are talking about.
Rajeev
Delhi, India
May 24, 2008 12:00 AM
62
Vinod,

>> Every one in this forum has understood you well.

Another post indicating that you are an idiot.
Ghulam Y Faruki
New York, United States
May 24, 2008 12:00 AM
61
>> despite the fact that in any exams general and obc category average mark is differen by mere 1 0r 2 %.. suggesting they don;t need reservation..

Correct, OBCs marks are barely 1-2% lower. The gap is lower in southern states having history of affirmative action.
Now, with such good level competency why OBC representation is so low, less than 10%, in every field? Answer is prejudice. This is one reason why reservation is needed. Also, it give opportunity to upper castes to come out of their shell and learn to learn in diverse environment.
Rajesh
Phoenix, United States
May 24, 2008 12:00 AM
60
>> For Rajesh yadav 99.99999% case of excess agsinst dalit comes from OBC get yourself informed..

I never disclosed my last name but you assumed it is 'Yadav'. This is indicative of prevalent prejudice.
But you are correct that lot of atrocities on Dalits are committed by OBCs. There are several castes within OBCs, some overlord others. Similarly Dalit is not a monolithic community. This is the gist of brahmanical system - that all men are created unequal.
That's why Mandal politics and Mayawati's Bahujan Samaj is so important. These movements mobilized hundreds of castes to create political force.
Rajesh
Phoenix, United States
May 24, 2008 12:00 AM
59
Vinod,

>> By pointing your fingers at the Sanghies as responsible for all the ills of the Muslims you are proving yourself as an amateur poster.

It is obvious that you do not understand any of the posts in this forum. To misquote me is habitual for a hateful liar like you.
Ghulam Y Faruki
New York, United States
May 24, 2008 12:00 AM
58
That saem Sc within weeks ratifies a very political legislation like OBC reservation. despite the fact that in any exams general and obc category average mark is differen by mere 1 0r 2 %.. suggesting they don;t need reservation..
Noone complains then about SC
Rahul
Delhi, India
May 24, 2008 12:00 AM
57
brhamanical this brahmincal that despite the fact that brahmins top the list in below poverty line.. So much so recently they asked for the job in Sulkabh Shaulchalkaya but sc/st said that job is their right..
every day OBCs oppress sc/st bot noone bothers

Rahul
Delhi, India
May 24, 2008 12:00 AM
56
Indian judiciary is not only slow but biased and corrupt to the core. In case of AIIMS director Venugopal, who was indicted for practicing blatant castiesm, Supreme court acted with lightning speed in delivering verdict in his and fellow upper caste anti-reservationist's favor.
On the other hand cases related to atrocities on SC/ST take years and in 95% of cases upper caste oppressors are acquitted .

RAJESH
PHOENIX UNITED STATES

For Rajesh yadav 99.99999% case of excess agsinst dalit comes from OBC get yourself informed.. laloo's minister pees in mouth of his sc/st driver and yet enjoys ministership that's how pathetic pobc leaders and obcs in general have become
Rahul
Delhi, India
May 24, 2008 12:00 AM
55
This may be the case of someone wronged but given u guys are mouthpiece of bonafide murders like Afzal gurur it's hard to believe any message delivered by you..
Rahul
Delhi, India
May 23, 2008 12:00 AM
54
The tryst with extreme stupidity continues...

[Rajesh>> There is still no evidence that naxalites PURPOSELY (emphasis mine) killed women and children.]

Our poor "victimized" babu sitting in Phoenix, but with a direct line to Dantewadaa makes 2 sweeping points:
(a) NO EVIDENCE (note the finality)

that (b) NAXALITES PURPOSELY KILL WOMEN AND CHILDREN

So, how does one "PROVE" that naxalites "PURPOSELY" kill anyone - so, do we think that the naxalites "inadvertently" (a) setup a land mine and (b) blew up a 12-year old (c) opened fire on a vehicle with 5-year old children

"Twelve people, including ten Mizoram Armed Force personnel and a 12-year-old boy, died after Maoists blew up a jeep by triggering a landmine at Murliguda village"

"Raipur: When one jeep refused to stop, the Maoists opened fire, injuring a five-year old girl who died at Wadrafnagar on the way to the hospital..."

How nice - of course, we can always assume that this is "NOT EVIDENCE" and even if that does not satisy, declare that such attacks were not done 'PURPOSELY".

Incidentally, our "victimized" babu from Phoenix - AOK with Naxalites:
- slitting throats

- killing hundreds of civilians

- forcing children to become child soldiers

- forcing girls aged 14-18 to have sex with them (rape)

Far left terrorists have killed in millions in the last 100 years - we DONT need them in India . Invite them to Phoenix.
lookout bug me not
mumbai, India
May 23, 2008 12:00 AM
53
>> Naxalites blowing up innocent civilians again and again ..

There is still no evidence that naxalites purposely killed women and children.
There are plenty of cases when police and feudal landlords specifically targeted women and children.

>> Naxalite has gone to the extent of dealing with the dreaded Muslims terrorists for thier supply of arms and sophisticated explosives

No matter how government cooks up stories, it can't be denied that naxalites have groundroot support. By equating naxalites with Muslim terrorists you are only legitimizing terrorism.

Indian ruling class has more worry from the downtrodden than threat in Kashmir and northeast from Pakistan and China. Army's Border road building organization would rather build roads in naxalites hit areas for convenience in patrolling than at Indo-China border.
Rajesh
Phoenix, United States
May 23, 2008 12:00 AM
52
Vinod,

>> By accusing the Sanghies in exchange for my accusing you as a jehadi defender you have accepted it.

This is how 12 year olds argue!
Ghulam Y Faruki
New York, United States
May 23, 2008 12:00 AM
51
Vinod,

>> you try to look for opportunities to save and defend the Jehadi asses.

On the contrary I try to needle and mock Sanghi asses like yourself.
Ghulam Y Faruki
New York, United States
May 23, 2008 12:00 AM
50
Noticed this gem....

Quote:[Naxalites, on the other hand, are at far higher moral ground. They have code of conduct not to target women and children and they strictly adhere by it]

On the contrary, if you peruse collected news-clips about naxalites over the last 2-3 years you'll find naxalites doing the following:

- forcing young children to become naxalites and child soldiers

- frying alive children as young as 6 months old

- slitting the throats of people who dare to vote

- blowing up innocent civilians again and again

- eating the flesh of their victims

- abducting young girls and forcing them to have sex with them

Much of this data is available in multiple news report - so, much for a naxalite "code of conduct" (or rather lack thereof)
lookout bug me not
mumbai, India
May 23, 2008 12:00 AM
49
A week ago police arrested a top naxalite leader. Here is how. They first arrested his son, in reality he was taken as hostage. The thread of son's torture forced the naxalite leader to surrender. Now in custody the police used his son to force confession.
This is how police carry out anti-naxalite operation.
Naxalites, on the other hand, are at far higher moral ground. They have code of conduct not to target women and children and they strictly adhere by it.
Now it is anybody guess who will win this war. The police is at free fall.
Rajesh
Phoenix, United States
May 23, 2008 12:00 AM
48
Vinod,

>> Will you call the arguments in defense of the guilty in the mumbai blast case too were weak and hence the court awarded the punishment?

You are not making any sense, because you do not know what points were being discussed.
Ghulam Y Faruki
New York, United States
May 23, 2008 12:00 AM
47
Vinod,

>> Will some one listen and agree with me
if I say that the Hindus in the Bilkis Bano case are not given a fair trial.

If you have good arguments. The arguments that the defense was negligent in Afzal's trial was made not by me but by some well known lawyers whose articles were published in Outlook. Why do you write such idiotic posts?
Ghulam Y Faruki
New York, United States
May 23, 2008 12:00 AM
46
J,

>> Have you listend to Arundhati Roy and other "Secular" "Human rights" activists who keep saying that Afzal is "innocent" and he didn't get a proper trail.

They do not say he is innocent. They question the quality of his defense, and the language used by the supreme court in justification of the death sentence. Arundhati may be an exception. But to compare this with Dr.Sen's case is silly.
Ghulam Y Faruki
New York, United States
May 22, 2008 12:00 AM
45
GF,

>>Nobody ever said that Afzal or Sohrabuddin are innocent.

Have you listend to Arundhati Roy and other "Secular" "Human rights" activists who keep saying that Afzal is "innocent" and he didn't get a proper trail.
J
Bangalore, India
May 22, 2008 12:00 AM
44
from farooki's link

'His appeal for bail has been turned down despite appeals from many public intellectuals across the world, including 22 Nobel laureates. Clearly, the court and police are unwilling to consider his exemplary record as a health and civil rights activist in one of the most underdeveloped regions of the country. '

So if nobel laureates can subvert the law of a democratic country and a health worker can provide support to Maoists who kill innocent citizens of India.
Rajeev
Delhi, India
May 22, 2008 12:00 AM
43
This armour of goodness was dnied bail by the Sessions Court, the High Court and the Supreme court. The Maoists are expert at undermining the rule of the land and there is not a dearth of rabble rousers who support such heinous people. Goebbels must be happy that his followers are carrying his methods forward.

From the Daily Pioneer of 19th May

Even as the free Vinayak Sen move is gaining momentum, the Chhattisgarh Government has ridiculed the demand, saying protesters of the PUCL leader's arrest seem to be not even caring for law of the land.

What has come as a surprise to the powers-that-be is the demand of Nobel laureates, who have also thrown their weight behind the sympathizers of Sen, by demanding his release. He has been in jail for last one year allegedly for helping Maoists.

"His bail was rejected by the Supreme Court. Despite the fact that the matter is in the court they are raising demand for Sen's release against whom there is strong evidence proving his close links with the Maoists," a top Government source said. "If Government did injustice by arresting him he would have been given bail by the court. In a way, the wide-ranging demand from so called intellectuals is casting aspersion on the legal system," he added.

Sources pointed out that the Nobel prize winners and other celebrities through media are trying to create an impression across the world that Vinayak Sen is in custody without a trial though the fact is that he has been taken through judicial process starting from the district level court. It is a false propaganda being fanned by them," said a top official.

Reacting to the move to challenge Chhattisgarh's special Act, under which Sen has been booked, sources wondered why the same was not challenged in the last one year.

"Now it seems that they have been jerked out of sleep realising the fact that there was very strong case against him," said a Home department source.

"Sen's sympathizers are calling the special Act as anti-people. Why they waited so long to resort to judicial remedy?" he asked.

"We are guided by law, while there is a strong judicial system to safeguard people's right. In the case of Vinayak Sen, the highest judiciary, Supreme Court, has rejected his bail, so why is there a move to decide the judicial matter in an extra-judicial manner," reacted State Government spokesman N Baijendra Kumar, who is Commissioner Public Relations.

On the other hand, a police official rued that apart from common people, young policemen were mercilessly killed in landmines detonated by the Maoists, but no one from the so called intellectuals or any human rights group raised any voice. "Why they are silent on Maoist related killings," said a top police officer posted in Maoist-hit Bastar.
Rajeev
Delhi, India
May 22, 2008 12:00 AM
42
@Rajesh from Phoenix wrote
It is clear that India cannot govern itself.World community must step in.

Your lahori logic has floored me.

How many innocent Iraqis have been killed by your US government?
Rajeev
Delhi, India
May 22, 2008 12:00 AM
41
"The Chhattisgarh government's stance on the issue compromises its responsibility to the rights guaranteed by the Constitution. Every citizen has a right to speech and association and the government ought to protect these rights. Even if one assumes that Sen is sympathetic to Maoist ideology, as alleged by the police, he has a right to uphold his views unless proven to have violated the law in the process. He also has a right to a speedy and fair trial. Sen is held guilty by association and the government is unwilling to recognise its mistake despite pleas from all around."


http://timesofindia.ind...articleshow/3061166.cms

Ghulam Y Faruki
New York, United States
May 22, 2008 12:00 AM
40
J,

>> First Afzal is "innocent". Then Sohrabuddin is "innocent" and now this commie terrorist Sen is "innocent".

Nobody ever said that Afzal or Sohrabuddin are innocent.
Ghulam Y Faruki
New York, United States
May 22, 2008 12:00 AM
39
First Afzal is "innocent". Then Sohrabuddin is "innocent" and now this commie terrorist Sen is "innocent". Do we have a legal system in this country or not? When did left leaning "secular" media and "secular" commie activists become the final legal authority in this country, surpassing even the Supreme courts. No wonder police men don't feel like arresting these terrorists and do us a great favour by killing them on the spot. I salute DIG Vanjara, who eliminated Sohrabuddin.

This naxal terrorist Sen should also be eliminated before this drama by "secular" NGOs and communist funded "Human Rights" organizations gets any further. What is a Bengali doctor with a bread (tell tale sign that one has been bitten by the communist bug - Praful Bidwai, Prannoy Roy) doing in such a remote place in the first place.

If and when this naxal terrorist gets freed, he will become a frequent guest on NDTV talk shows. He might even get nominated for Bharat Ratna award in NDTV poll. He is sure to win greatest Indian of the year from NDTV or CNN-IBN. Even the "secular" Govt. of India (if still in power) might confer on him the Padma award for his services rendered for the cause of communism in India.
J
Bangalore, India
May 20, 2008 12:00 AM
38
Why don't they let the courts decide?
A sustained campaign by Maoist sympathisers have started off late to secure release of Dr Sen
Isn't is strange that all of a sudden, some obscure organisation has decided to confer an even more obscure award to a person who was practically unknown in India for his so-called path breaking work. Isn't it more wierd that 22 Nobel laureates, none of them anywhere remotely connected to Rights movement in General and Indian Rights in particular sign off an appeal on behalf of Dr Sen. Isn't it all the more strange that precisely at this time, fellow traveller on the roads of secularism, the progressive Outlook magazine has devoted reams of pages on why Dr Sen should be released?

Strange are the ways of Marxists-Maoists. If the courts exonerate anyone of their liking, it is because the accused was falsely implicated. If the courts decline to exonerate anyone they support, it is only because there are undue pressures on the judiciary

The merits of the case are conveniently sacrificed on the alter of polemics and ideology. The basic facts that the good Doctor was apprehended trying to pass sensitive information to a jailed Maoist and that his activism was all directed againt the self protective Salwa Judum are easily passed over. We are presented a picture of a modern day Florence Nightangle trying to help the downtrodden

Please don't swallow whatever is thrown at you by these propaganidists. Let the courts decide the guilt of Dr Sen.
Prima facie, there is more than enough evidence which could easily prove that he has been engaged in waging a war against the country

The likes of Dr Sen and his sympathisers, the Bidwais, Patkars, Srivastavas, Bhushans and Roy Chowdhurys of the world are adept at breast beating when one of their ilk is put behind bars. None will be seen berating the Maoists or leading a fast or a human chain against terror attacks. These are professionals. This article is merely another one sided propaganda piece of that polemical factory
ankush poddar
Kolkata, India
May 20, 2008 12:00 AM
37
What is the locus standi of these 22 Noble Laureates?

A mere letter by 22 Nobel laureates is sufficient for Indians to forget about crime and subversive activities. If Dr Sen was so concerned about the poor and down-trodden only, what made him meet Mr Sanyal 33 times, that too all the time passing subversive correspondence to him

Has anyone even paused to think as to what locus standi these 22 eminences enjoy that they write to the Indian Government seeking release of a terrorist?

Moreover, of these 22, none is a Peace prize winner. There are two economists, 9 physics winners, 9 from Medicine and 2 from chemistry. None of these winners is connected to India in any way nor have they visited our country, leave aside visiting Chhatisgarh

Is it that difficult to get someone endorse a release? There are numerous card carrying Marxists amongst the intelligentsia of the West, all of whom are experts at misrepresentation and calumny.

Please pause to think. This Dr Binayak Sen is practically unknown to even the Indian public. How can then he be treated as such a colossal personality that so many eminent personalities are concerned over the so-called excesses being committed on him. This is mere propaganda by Maoist Marxists, nothing more

Fellow countrymen, please don't get mislead simply because some misguided foreigners have said so

Let the law of land prevail. For the Marxist Maoists, Afzal Guru is innocent, Geelani was falsely implicated, am sure they will declare even Maulana Masood Azhar only a poor victim of circumstances who was trying to earn his living giving religious discourses but was forced to pick up the Gun by the satanic Indian Republic

ankush poddar
Kolkata, India
May 20, 2008 12:00 AM
36
A sob story without substance
ankush poddar
Kolkata, India
May 20, 2008 12:00 AM
35
"Maoists/Naxalites will save the Hindustani Hindus from the ignonimy of being ruled by Muslims for the Second Time."

1971 Forgotten ??
Khushi Ram
ambala cantt, India
May 20, 2008 12:00 AM
34
From June 1, 2008, Ms/Mr. Lookout Bug Me Not, I am going to add Inexorable March Of Maoists/ Naxalites to my Inexorable March Of Islam in the context, respectively, of India and the World.

I think Baghwan has heard the Supplications of all those R. S. S.-types and Friends of Bajapa, who are so paranoid about Islam and so scared of Muslims that Baghwan will spare India, to a degree, from the Inexorable March Of Islam and give them, instead, the Inexorable March of Maoist/Naxalites.

Although they will profess to be Communists, they will be, in essence, disillusioned Hindus, and will, therefore, provide some mental and physical comfort to Hindustani Hindus in comparison with the purportedly barbaric rule of Muslims. Rule by the Maoists/Naxalites will save the Hindustani Hindus from the ignonimy of being ruled by Muslims for the Second Time.

Joseph
Karachi, Pakistan
May 20, 2008 12:00 AM
33
>> a scene from a surreal film, if Islam marches from the East and West and the Maoist/Naxalites from the North and the South

Given the ways of Indian ruling elites, it can actually happen. The brahmanical system has survived countless external invasions. But they cannot withstand the rise of suppressed masses.
They would rather put armed forces to control internal unrest than stopping Chinese aggression in Laddakh and northeast.
Rajesh
Phoenix, United States
May 20, 2008 12:00 AM
32
Scumbags who help naxalites should be left to rot in jail. This dude has had enough chances in several courts to prove that the charges against him are false - he simply has not been able to.

NGOs that are doing good work for the poor are doing so, without cavorting with mass-murdering Naxalites.

Several governments have been stymied in building schools, roads in Naxalite troubled areas - so, development is being blocked by these liberation theologists masquerading as naxalites.

Naxalites are not helping poor Indians or tribals - just b'cos Binayak-dude wants to collaborate with Naxalites now known for their cannibalistic punishments - does not mean that we fall for this kind of nonsense.
lookout bug me not
mumbai, India
May 20, 2008 12:00 AM
31
Please read as Mr. Rajesh for Mr. Rajeesh.

Sorrt.

Thank You.

Joseph
Karachi, Pakistan
May 20, 2008 12:00 AM
30
Please read as Mr. Rajesh for Mr. Rajeesh.

Sorrt.

Thank You.

Joseph
Karachi, Pakistan
May 20, 2008 12:00 AM
29
Please read as Mr. Rajesh for Mr. Rajeesh.

Sorrt.

Thank You.

Joseph
Karachi, Pakistan
May 20, 2008 12:00 AM
28
It will be great fun, Mr. Rajeesh, and a scene from a surreal film, if Islam marches from the East and West and the Maoist/Naxalites from the North and the South.

It is a bit of black humour at this juncture but it is within the realm of possibility given the totally incompetent way the Governments in India conduct Foreign Policy and Statesmanship.

Mr Varun Shekhar, what have you to say?.

Joseph
Karachi, Pakistan
May 20, 2008 12:00 AM
27
>> The Indian Supreme court is equally corrupt when it comes to upholding true values of justice. They are as corrupt and "Indian" as the rest of the politicians and administration.

I disagree.
Higher judiciary is more corrupt than police, politicians and other government organs. At least politicians have to go to people every 5 years to get elected. Judges don't care about such silly things. Calling public servant offends them. The chief justice of India recently said that Right to Information does not apply to them. Nobody knows how they are selected for job, how much they earn and how much asset they posses. Then there is law of contempt that silence anyone who raise finger against the judges.

The ruling elites better realize that it is because of people like Dr Sen that naxalite movement is still under control. Else no one, including dirty tactics of police, can stop naxalites from marching towards Delhi. Just look at Nepal how it is done.
Rajesh
Phoenix, United States
May 20, 2008 12:00 AM
26
Another achievement of resurgent India. The country has joined the elite league of rogue states - Sudan, North Korea, Iran, Burma.
It is clear that India cannot govern itself. World community must step in.
Rajesh
Phoenix, United States
May 20, 2008 12:00 AM
25
Indian judiciary is not only slow but biased and corrupt to the core. In case of AIIMS director Venugopal, who was indicted for practicing blatant castiesm, Supreme court acted with lightning speed in delivering verdict in his and fellow upper caste anti-reservationist's favor.
On the other hand cases related to atrocities on SC/ST take years and in 95% of cases upper caste oppressors are acquitted .
Rajesh
Phoenix, United States
May 20, 2008 12:00 AM
24
"Your feeble attempts at sarcasm are outside the bounds of decency."

Thanks for the compliment.
Ganesan
Nj, USA
May 20, 2008 12:00 AM
23
Ganesan,

>> Fabricate a story that Priyanka Vadra met the guy in prison and tried to find the truth.

Your feeble attempts at sarcasm are outside the bounds of decency.

Ghulam Y Faruki
New York, United States
May 19, 2008 12:00 AM
22
Yes, the entire Indian Judicial system needs cleansing. They are the products of the same society/ family that has produced the corrupt ministers, the corrupt politicians and the corrupt civil servants. The blood in the veins of the judiciary come from the corrupt value system of the society itself. In every part of the country, it takes 20 years for a civil court to deliver their justice. And these uneducated idiots consider themselves 'judges' and are out to 'judge' you. That's just a basic sample of the output from our judicial system. They should be first ashamed of being inefficient about disbursement of justice. "Justice delayed is justice denied". That's the first sentence any law student learns in a law school. It's criminal in itself for a civil society to deny justice. Now who is going to judge the judiciary for their criminal activity of denying justice? Vinayak Sen is just a sample. Any and every Indian citizen is a Vinayak Sen when they have to put up with a corrupt judiciary who pose as "intellectuals" and "learned". Again, a society gets what it deserves.
Raj
Chicago, United States
May 19, 2008 12:00 AM
21
For people to champion the cause of one individual howsoever great he or she is because they perceive the system has wronged him, and not seek cleansing of the entire Indian Judicial system is political corruption.

sohan
rockville, United States
May 19, 2008 12:00 AM
20
Even if there was no medical equipment with him, he as an Indian has every right to give a helping hand to the tribals. If India wants to tell to the rest of the world that the country has a civilisation, they need to demostrate it. The other option is to decimate all the tribals and stop faking as a civilised society. No court, no constitution in any civil society can go above the principles of natural justice. Right to survival is a natural born right of every species. The Indian Supreme court is equally corrupt when it comes to upholding true values of justice. They are as corrupt and "Indian" as the rest of the politicians and administration. Thanks to people like Vinayak Sen, the country can still call itself civilised to some extent.
Raj
Chicago, United States
May 19, 2008 12:00 AM
19
I dont know anything about the case so will refrain from commenting on the case. However I have a suggestion for people who want the guy released.

Fabricate a story that Priyanka Vadra met the guy in prison and tried to find the truth. Just like the nice yarn about Priyanka meeting Nalini. Binayak Sen will gain the instant respect and admiration of the govt. And his path to freedom will be much simpler.
Ganesan
Nj, USA
May 19, 2008 12:00 AM
18
Stop your rantings. Let us concentrate on this case rather than talkign about Adavani, Gandhi, Bithari, etc. As far as i know the pereptrators of the despicable Nithari killings are being tried in court and are behind bars.

Supreme Court has denied bail. Do you wish to undermine the Supreme Court?
or do you wish to say that the Sessions Court, the High Court and the Supreme Court are all wrong?
Rajeev
Delhi, India
May 19, 2008 12:00 AM
17
MALES going to jail for whatever reason, does not seem to trouble the conscience of our beloved fellow countrymen

It is fashionable to be a feminist.
Rajeev
Delhi, India
May 19, 2008 12:00 AM
16
For some like me, its not about agendas and ideologies - i have none. I have more respect for Mayavati than a hypocrite like Jyoti Basu - though I really respect neither.

Its about individuals and the individual human being. I was just trying to understand the reason behind the general callousness in Indian middle class, urban society. How could Nithari and all the cover ups around it happen in the capital of India and essentially no one cares. Where is the outrage? Do we really believe that poor children being murdered and the murderer being protected by the establishment is not worth getting angry over? Or are we just afraid? What do Advani and the Gandhis think about this case. Are they really powerless to demand a proper investigation? Do they not feel any shame? And are they able to be shameless because we the middle class don't care? Forget politics, don't Delhi citizens with children feel any fear, pain, shame or anger when they read about police misconduct in Nithari.

I have no political beliefs. But like many Indians, I feel neither our police nor our judiciary have any credibility left. Not least because they have done nothing to display even the slightest fear of public opinion as public servants- in any case. In the rizwan case the latest court documents claim Priyanka was abducted - this after she wrote respectful leters to the mother in law in national newspapers from her father's home. This is the CBI, we are supposed to trust.
But we the people let it happen.

And rajeeve, I think I do understand you now. You simply like the status quo maintained, because you are probably doing well under the system. And you want to abuse anyone who rocks the boat. Good for you!
Thank you.
Annakali Ray
London, United Kingdom
May 19, 2008 12:00 AM
15
So we have Maoist sympathisers here who wish to go against the judgement of the Supreme Court of India and instead rely on the whims of the banana court set up by the supporters of Sen.
Rajeev
Delhi, India
May 19, 2008 12:00 AM
14
From Today's Daily Pioneer

Chhattisgarh Govt flays demand for Vinayak Sen's release

Shivanand Shukla | Raipur

Even as the free Vinayak Sen move is gaining momentum, the Chhattisgarh Government has ridiculed the demand, saying protesters of the PUCL leader's arrest seem to be not even caring for law of the land.

What has come as a surprise to the powers-that-be is the demand of Nobel laureates, who have also thrown their weight behind the sympathizers of Sen, by demanding his release. He has been in jail for last one year allegedly for helping Maoists.

"His bail was rejected by the Supreme Court. Despite the fact that the matter is in the court they are raising demand for Sen's release against whom there is strong evidence proving his close links with the Maoists," a top Government source said. "If Government did injustice by arresting him he would have been given bail by the court. In a way, the wide-ranging demand from so called intellectuals is casting aspersion on the legal system," he added.

Sources pointed out that the Nobel prize winners and other celebrities through media are trying to create an impression across the world that Vinayak Sen is in custody without a trial though the fact is that he has been taken through judicial process starting from the district level court. It is a false propaganda being fanned by them," said a top official.

Reacting to the move to challenge Chhattisgarh's special Act, under which Sen has been booked, sources wondered why the same was not challenged in the last one year.

"Now it seems that they have been jerked out of sleep realising the fact that there was very strong case against him," said a Home department source.

"Sen's sympathizers are calling the special Act as anti-people. Why they waited so long to resort to judicial remedy?" he asked.

"We are guided by law, while there is a strong judicial system to safeguard people's right. In the case of Vinayak Sen, the highest judiciary, Supreme Court, has rejected his bail, so why is there a move to decide the judicial matter in an extra-judicial manner," reacted State Government spokesman N Baijendra Kumar, who is Commissioner Public Relations.

On the other hand, a police official rued that apart from common people, young policemen were mercilessly killed in landmines detonated by the Maoists, but no one from the so called intellectuals or any human rights group raised any voice. "Why they are silent on Maoist related killings," said a top police officer posted in Maoist-hit Bastar.
Rajeev
Delhi, India
May 18, 2008 12:00 AM
13
Partha sarathy, (I obviously have nothing better to do right now), thank you for your measured response.

The CAPS was only to differentiate from Rajeeves quotes - but I see your point :)

Media all over the world, focus on bad news. Some times in a ghoulish way, the recent frizl case in Austria for example have dominated headlines for way too long.

I agree they do not care about pain, the way doctors do not care about the patient, in order to function. The reason I wrote these letters, is that I have been curious about the callousness of the reader's comments across the English language press in India.

To give you an apolitical example, there was a Indian software Engineer who had turned into a vegetable after an accident in the US and sent back. Manjunath I think. He came from the sort of family I came from. And I was very touched by the campaign TOI ran to raise money for him and so were my friends in the US. Who identified with him. But a lot of letters were written saying that TOI does not care , they are doing this for publicity blah blah. Why this case. what about other people who need help etc. And I was stunned, I mean why be negative about something so positive? People showed they care. Is that not good? And TOI is the most pro rich newspaper I know.

THIS IS A MAJOR TREND excuse the caps.
Same thing here: attack someone doing something positive.

And by the way I do believe India should be tough on security. Be nuclear. And crack down on illegal immigrants and use the death penalty more often. We can not afford to nurse murderers and traitors.

But we should also not be a society only of the haves. Or we will in 20 years time be a crime ridden society like latin America, where the rich have bodyguards and helicopters and the middle class are terrified of stepping out. its in our interest to create a just and fair society.
Annakali Ray
London, United Kingdom
May 18, 2008 12:00 AM
12
For the same reason that you are here, Annakali, and through the exercise of our free wills. Again, acceptance or otherwise is also an exercise of free will. I am for that and for presenting all points of view. That is why I am here.

Joseph
Karachi, Pakistan
May 18, 2008 12:00 AM
11
Joseph, I frankly dont know what you do on outlookindia? Why are you here? just curious.

Rajeeve, I am from a very middle class family from a small town, most of my relatives are still in small towns and villages across India. NRIs give a lot of money to political parties in India - no one protests. I am sure you have no problem with those who invited Narendra Modi to US. Those people exercised their freedom of expression. I am expressing my freedom of expression in the way I want to - by providing moral support to those who work on the fringe in India - I used to think my opinions are completely useless, but i have now realised that even having an opinion is relevant.
Annakali Ray
London, United Kingdom
May 18, 2008 12:00 AM
10
I UNDERSTAND THE ANGER OF THE POOR, NOT OF THE RICH LIKE YOU

yeah i know sitting in london you know more about poor than someone like me a ctiizen of India living in Delhi. Stop your pathetic attempts at being conerned for the poor.
Rajeev
Delhi, India
May 18, 2008 12:00 AM
9
some joker from London writes -
'THE POOR IN THIS COUNTRY ARE EXPLOITED AND TERRORISED'
and another joker from a joke of a country called Paksitan chimes in -
God Bless you, Annakali

go to Tihar jail in Delhi and you will find that more than 80% of the inmates are from the very poor section of the society. i have never seen any article by so called eminent people yet highlight their plight.

WHEN 2 ADULTS GOT MARRIED IN KOLKATA RECENTLY THE POLICE CALLED THEM INTO THEIR STATIONS REPEATEDLY AND HARRASSED THEM

you are being selective by pulling things out of your musharraf at random.

how many articles have been wrtiten for prsocuting Salman Khan or the grandson of Admiral Nanda for mowing down very poor and innocent people. how many nobel lauretes have signed petitions? come on give me a break. you live in London not India.

WHICH NOBEL LAUREATE GOT THE PRIZE FOR RABBLE ROUSING

i am calling the friends of the nobel lauretes as rabble rousers.

examples of rabble rouser include peopel like Arundhati Roy. She vehemently opposes India exploding nuclear bombs and htreatents to give up Indian citizenships. Two years later she accepts Booker prize in a country that has submarines with nuclear missiles patrolling the oceans. Where do you think these nuclear missiles are pointed at? Ask your government in UK.
Rajeev
Delhi, India
May 18, 2008 12:00 AM
8
God Bless you, Annakali. It feels good to find a soul-mate in the midst of such arrogant and self-centred people. Please stay on. Thank You.

Joseph
Karachi, Pakistan
May 18, 2008 12:00 AM
7
FOR RAJEEVE.
YOU SAID:
"I still do not understand if he is innocent why can't Outlook hire a lawayer and file an application in court against his unlawful detention. Instead of indulging in a verbal media crusade to free him"

THE ROLE OF A MEDIA OUTLET IN A FREE SOCIETY IS NOT TO FIGHT LAWSUITS, BUT TO INFORM THE PUBLIC. DO YOU SERIOUSLY SUGGEST THAT OI SHOULD HAVE GOT INTO LITIGATION AND HIRED A LAWYER AND NOT WRITTEN THIS REPORT? CAN YOU NAME ANY OTHER MEDIA OUTLET ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD WHICH YOU KNOW DOES THAT.
let the law of land prevail. he can't be incarcerated if he is innocent. REALLY? LET ME GIVE YOU SOME EXAMPLES OF HOW THA LAW OF THIS LAND WORKS. WHEN 2 ADULTS GOT MARRIED IN KOLKATA RECENTLY THE POLICE CALLED THEM INTO THEIR STATIONS REPEATEDLY AND HARRASSED THEM. THIS IS DOCUMENTED. JESSICA LALL - JUSTICE HAPPENED WITHOUT PUBLIC OUTRAGE? NITHARI - THE OWNER OF THE HOUSE WHO PAID SEVERAL LACS TO THE POLICE AS BRIBE TO PROTECT HIS SERVANT (DOCUMENTED) IS INNOCENT, BUT THE SERVANTIS A SERIAL KILLER. MAIN WITNESS MYSTERIOUSLY KILLED. I HOPE NO FAMILY MEMBER OF YOURS IS RUN OVER BY SOMEONE RICH AND FAMOUS - I AM SURE YOU WILL GET THE LAW OF THE LAND TO GIVE YOU JUSTICE WITH NO MEDIA SUPPORT.

When nobel laureates and and dubious people who have found fame with their rabble rousing start taking up a case, i smell something fishY - WHICH NOBEL LAUREATE GOT THE PRIZE FOR RABBLE ROUSING? RABINDRANATH TAGORE GAVE UP HIS KNIGHTHOOD TO PROTEST THE AMRITSAR MASSACRE, WOULD YOU CALL THAT RABBLE ROUSING? TAGORE, AMARTYA SEN (WHO SAID THE BENGAL FAMINE HAPPENED BECAUSE THOSE IN POWER, THE BRITISH, LET THE PEOPLE STARVE)CV RAMAN/ CHANDRASEKHAR ET AL ARE DUBIOUS PEOPLE?

THE POOR IN THIS COUNTRY ARE EXPLOITED AND TERRORISED - I AM SURE YOU DO NOT BELIEVE THAT?

WHAT I FIND AMAZING IS NOT THAT THE "EDUCATED" PEOPLE IN THE CITIES ARE INURED TO THE SUFFERING OF THEIR FELLOW CITIZENS, BUT THEIR IS SO MUCH RAGE FOR PEOPLE WHO HAVE A SOCIAL CONSCIENCE AND ACT UPON IT.

WHY ARE YOU SO ANGRY AT A DOCTOR WHO WORKED WITH THE POOR AND THE MEDIA THAT HIGHLIGHTED HIS UNFAIR IMPRISONMENT RAJEEVE? I REALLY WANT TO UNDERSTAND?
BECAUSE THERE ARE LOTS OF PEOPLE LIKE YOU. I DONT GET IT. I UNDERSTAND THE ANGER OF THE POOR, NOT OF THE RICH LIKE YOU, WHO CAN NOT EVEN SEE OTHER PEOPLE DO SOMETHING POSITIVE.
Annakali Ray
London, United Kingdom
May 18, 2008 12:00 AM
6
If anyone really deserves to be punished for association with the naxalites in india, it is sitaram yechury of the commies group. They won't touch him, bec the commies' support in parliament is reqd for the survival of the govt.
v.seshadri
chennai, india
May 18, 2008 12:00 AM
5
The govnt has been going all out to get doctors involved in compulsory rural postings. Sincere involvement in rural health cannot be free of the social involvement of a commited doctor which can go a long way in bringing social and thereby health upliftment. It is involved doctors like these who have actively decreased barbaric practices like branding (burning with a hot iron rod in the hope of cure for a disease), unhygienic delivery methods resulting in a significantly less maternal and infant mortality rate, prevent diarrhoeal deaths as they inculcate ORS into the village traditions and prevent malarial deaths like mentioned in your article.
Such doctors should be appreciated. Instead, when a person like him is incarcerated like this, it sends alarm bells for other honestly intersted young medics, making them wary of stepping into such commitment.
In that case, India has neither the right to ask its medics to go to rural areas nor the right to crib about low health coverage in rural areas. The cities and corporates after all, seem not only comfortable, but safe options - where you can dream of retirement in a beach side villa instead of a Chattisgarh jail cell.
Dennisa Davidson
Chennai, India
May 18, 2008 12:00 AM
4
An admirable piece of advocacy journalism. Such cases need to be kept in the limelight.
Ghulam Y Faruki
New York, United States
May 17, 2008 12:00 AM
3
Framed, Nailed, Hanged - the titles appears to havebeen coined by an evangelical activist.
he has just been framed. why use the word nailed (brings in an association with the nailing of Jesus on the cross) and hanged.
Rajeev
Delhi, India
May 17, 2008 12:00 AM
2
I still do not understand if he is innocent why can't Outlook hire a lawayer and file an application in court against his unlawful detention. Instead of indulging in a verbal media crusade to free him, let the law of land prevail. he can't be incarcerated if he is innocent.
When nobel laureates and and dubious people who have found fame with their rabble rousing start taking up a case, i smell something fishy.
Rajeev
Delhi, India
May 17, 2008 12:00 AM
1
aah as expected the cries are growing louder now.
Rajeev
Delhi, India
COLLAPSE COMMENTS   
Post a Comment
You are not logged in, please log in or register
ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISING RATES | COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER | COMMENTS POLICY