Last September when the CBI gave a clean chit to Jagdish Tytler for his
alleged role in the 1984 carnage of Sikhs and sought closure of the cases
against him on the ground that it could not get any witnesses, it was déjà vu
for the Sikh community in Punjab. But anguish at yet another setback in the two
decades old would was soon replaced by ennui and the Sikh leadership went back
to its now familiar state of indifference towards a cause which moves few to
action. Not so within the expatriate community in the US though, which has
decided to take things into their hands and push the agenda for getting the
perpetrators of history's worst carnage against Sikhs convicted.
Result: a few damaging witnesses, who the CBI claimed could not be traced,
have surfaced in the last few days to say, that they are ready to depose against
the high profile accused Congressmen if they are assured of rehabilitation and
some protection. This is mainly due to the efforts of the US based 'Sikhs for
Justice' (SFJ) led by advocate Gurpatwant Singh Pannu, a coordination of
committee of gurudwaras in the US which is currently raising funds and
mobilizing community leaders to join hands for this cause. Says its spokesman in
India, Karnail Singh Peermohammed, "On November 5th we took a vow to
mobilize the Sikhs and drum up support for the beleaguered witnesses so that
they can depose fearlessly. We have managed to bring out three of them and have
identified another 17 of them in different parts of the country who had earlier
resiled from their testimonies due to pressure but are now prepared to speak the
truth. They are eyewitnesses to the involvement of not only Tytler but Kamal
Nath and Sajjan Kumar too."
That expatriate Sikhs have been setting the agenda for Punjab based Sikh
organisations in religious and temporal matters in recent times is a well
acknowledged fact. Consequently, the SFJ's appeal to the highest temporal body
of Sikhs the Akal Takht and the Shiromani Gurudwra Prabandhak Committee (SGPC)
both of whom are facing considerable flak for not giving the right leadership to
the community, responded immediately.
The SGPC has made a public offer to protect and give succor from harassment
to all such witnesses in the larger interest of the Sikh community. Surinder
Singh, (see interview linked at the bottom of this page) the head granthi of a
gurudwara in Delhi is the one of the first to respond to the appeal, followed by
Gurcharan Singh a bed ridden 60 year old living in Mohali and his two brothers
who had filed an FIR against Sajjan Kumar for allegedly being instrumental in
throwing him into a burning truck along with others in 1984.
Following Surinder Singh's declaration at a press conference some days ago
that he is ready to tell the truth the CBI, a few days ago, recorded his five
hour long testimony in which he has reportedly dwelt at length on Tytler's
involvement . It relates to a case of rioting and killing of three persons in
Gurudwara Pul Bangash on November 1st, 1984 soon after the then PM Indira
Gandhi's assassination. Interestingly, in 1992, 31 persons were acquitted in
this matter after a trial and though Surinder Singh was named as a witness he
was never called by the police for investigation. Later he deposed before the
Nanavati Commission which in 2005 referred this, and six other cases to the CBI
for reinvestigation. Surinder Singh is currently in Punjab and wants the SGPC to
keep its word and help him re-settle here. "I cannot go back to Delhi
because that will be suicidal for me. Tytler's henchmen will not leave me",
he told Outlook.
Another witness traced by the SFJ is Jasbir Singh now living in the US. When the
CBI sought closure of this case against Tytler and told a Delhi court that it
could not locate Jasbir, he appeared on a news channel saying he is ready to
depose. Following this, the Additional Chief Metropolitan Majistrate Sanjiv Jain
rejected the CBI's appeal and directed further investigation in the case.
However, Jasbir Singh who had earlier told the Nanavati Commission on August
31st , 2002 that "he had overheard Tytler rebuking his men on the night of
November 3red 1984….. for nominal killing of Sikhs in his constituency",
has expressed apprehensions about coming to India to depose. His counsel
Navkiran Singh told Outlook, "Jasbir wants the CBI to record his
testimony in the US either through video conferencing or by sending an official
as he fears for his life."
That no one of note has been punished for the carnage is a festering sore for
the Sikhs as a whole, even today. It crops up in public discourse and in private
conversations, and was most starkly visible when last year a Chandigarh court
convicted the assassins of then Punjab chief minister Beant Singh who was killed
in a bomb blast outside the Chandigarh secretariat in 1994. The popular mood as
articulated at that time by the Jathedar of the Akal Takht, Joginder Singh
Vedanti, was that these youth should not have been given the death penalty for a
crime which they had committed in the heat of the moment. Most felt that when
the accused in the 1984 carnage against Sikhs are still scot-free why should
these Sikh boys be convicted.
Equally palpable is a strong resentment against the Sikh political leadership
in Delhi and in Punjab for its failure to pursue these cases doggedly and avenge
the wrongs done to the entire community. Says Navkiran Singh, "There is a
realization now that the cases have not been handled properly by the Sikh
politicians of Delhi many of whom have played a negative role by not ensuring
the protection of witnesses. Even the SGPC, which has offered to help the
witnesses is even now not playing a constructive role. Look at how Surinder
Singh is running from pillar to post to get rehabilitated in Punjab. Yes, we
Sikhs are feeling let down by our own leaders but who cares?"
This week HS Phoolka, Delhi advocate and co author of When a Tree Shook
Delhi who has doggedly pursued 1984 carnage cases for the last two decades,
wrote a letter to the Punjab chief minister Prakash Singh Badal seeking Punjab
Police security for the witnesses who are coming out of the woodwork. He told Outlook,
"The security provided by the Delhi police is counterproductive as it is
designed more to keep an eye on the witnesses. The Punjab government should
depute its own policemen. We strongly feel that this is an issue which affects
Punjab directly even today because by not ensuring punishment for the accused
you are increasing resentment. Militancy increased in Punjab mainly after the
1984 carnage and the resultant sense of outrage. Militancy may have died down
but remove the underlying causes too, we say."
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT