Counterpoint
The Racial Slur That Wasn't
Ten observations on the monkey business of racism--notwithstanding the fact that it is far from certain that Harbhajan Singh did actually call Andrew Symonds a monkey.
1) It is ironic that the first charge of racism brought under the ICC code has been slapped on a man from a minority community in a brown country. And that the complaint was lodged by the white captain of an overwhelmingly white team from a country with a very troubling record of pervasive racism. That the said team practically invented what has euphemistically come to be known as sledging and that a recent former member of this team was involved in an overtly racial incident with his Sri Lankan opponents makes the irony richer.

2) This is from the "Say What?!!" department. The match referee Mike Procter, a white South African, proclaimed: "I am South African, and I understand the word 'racism'. I have lived with it for much of my life." Yes Mike, you have, but you were privileged under that system. How can that make you "understand" what it is like to be on the receiving end of it? Do those living in multi-crore mansions understand what it like to be poverty-stricken simply because they employ a poorly paid servant or live next to a slum?

3) We will probably never know whether Harbhajan Singh called Andrew Symonds a monkey (most Indians don't find it implausible that the Aussies could have cooked it up), but IF he did, it is inconceivable that he could have done it innocently. Symonds had been treated to monkey chants while touring India earlier, and the Indian team, including Harbhajan, had been made aware that "monkey" was a slur when used against a person of colour in Australia.

4) The monkey chants directed by Indian spectators at Symonds are surely a learned behavior. It is a distasteful page plucked out from the playbook of boorish European, especially Spanish, fans who greet black football players with this form of chanting while waving neo-Nazi banners and shouting at them to "Go back to Africa." But the association of "monkey" with black Africans goes much further back. I can recollect hearing people refer to them as "langoors" ever since I was a child.

5) I am not buying the wide-eyed innocence of many Indian fans who appear puzzled that monkey is being seen as a racist slur, particularly of the Sydney-based United Indian Association (UIA) which has apparently expressed surprise that their fellow Australians are taking umbrage at the term. Its president, Raj Natarajan, issued a statement saying that "Considering that the Monkey God is one of the revered idols of Hindu mythology and worshipped by millions, it is surprising it was considered a racist term." The UIA is either being disingenuous or has its head firmly stuck in the sand; its members live in Australia and pay some attention to the local discourse, don't they? Besides, if Harbhajan did call Symonds a monkey, I doubt that he was deifying him.

6) Let me say it. The term "monkey" when directed at a black/brown person is racist. The history of colonial racism is filled with the attempts of white rulers to depict the denizens of their black/brown colonies as savages, animals, undeveloped human beings, and unevolved… monkeys. The term in its various forms has been used by white racists to refer to people of colour. Monkey, ghetto monkey, porch monkey, tree swingers, simians, and shit slingers are slurs that have a long and distressing history. We forget it at our own peril.

7) Why exactly are we so outraged that someone could possibly level the charge of racism at us? After all, we practice our own forms of discrimination on the basis of caste, religion, occupation, language, region etc. The term "racist" may be unfamiliar in our context, but the workings of racism aren't. Bigotry and intolerance against a group of people based upon their inherited identities isn't exactly something that only happens elsewhere. Notions of the intrinsic superiority of one set of people over another and a resultant prejudice towards the latter aren't alien to our social landscape.

8) We are also fairly adept at buying into a racist structure when we move abroad. The conversations about African Americans in the homes of the U.S. NRIs distressingly echo the views of racist white Americans. Even before entering the U.S., Indian immigrants are armed with the 'knowledge' that blacks are lazy, untrustworthy, and dangerous. These immigrants may have white friends, but seldom interact with the black community. They may transgress cultural boundaries by marrying whites, but almost never by coupling up with an African American. They even have their own version of the 'nigger' epithet: kallu.

9) In this whole sordid issue, what got the raw end of the deal was the issue of racism itself. Once again, it has been boiled down to the actions or attitudes of one person against another. Racism however, not unlike poverty, is a structural problem. Structurally racist systems are configured to perpetuate inequalities. Notwithstanding the 40-odd years since the passage of the Civil Rights Act and the end of Jim Crow laws in the U.S., the discrepancies between whites and blacks on income, wealth, health, education, rates of incarceration and other economic and social indicators continue to be vast. It is the reductive understanding of racism as a mere individual act that gives us the comical spectacle of white umpire Darrell Hair suing the ICC for racial discrimination.

10) Sitting U.S. Senator George Allen of Virginia was giving his stump speech in 2006 when he noticed a staffer from the opposition camp taping him, and paused to ask his audience to "give a welcome to macaca here". Macaca, a word for the rhesus monkey, is a slur used by Francophone whites against the local blacks in Africa and it was speculated that Senator Allen had learned it from his mother, a Tunisian of French descent. The staffer, the only person of colour in the gathering, was S.R. Siddarth, an Indian-American. The same system of racial discrimination that allows us to feel superior to blacks and call them monkeys makes monkeys of us too.


Mir Ali Husain is the co-author of Anthems of Resistance: A Celebration of Progressive Urdu Poetry and the lyricist of Dor and Bombay to Bangkok

 
Daily Mail
COLLAPSE COMMENTS :
HAVE YOUR SAY
Jan 15, 2008 12:00 AM
26
SURESH KAMATH:

Give the Aussies the benefit of the doubt.

Just say: "Look, our chap says he never insulted you. But you clearly feel he did. Well, in that case, a profound apology. The matter is closed."

That's what a nation less moronic than India would have done.
Parbat Laldeng
Denver, United States
Jan 15, 2008 12:00 AM
25
This for you Mr. Vinod.

Pakistan’s paradox: bombs, blood and profits

KARACHI, Jan 10: A little more than six years ago, immediately after the Sept 11 terrorist attacks in the US, few sane investment advisers would have recommended Pakistani stocks.

They should have. Their clients could have made a fortune.

Since 2001, the nuclear-armed country has been making millionaires like newly minted coins.As Western governments have fretted about Pakistan’s nuclear weapons falling into ‘wrong hands’, the Karachi Stock Exchange’s main share index has risen more than 10-fold.

And it is not just that Karachi is a thinly traded market, able to be dragged skyward at time by speculators. Profits have taken off as well.

Even last month’s assassination of PPP leader Benazir Bhutto, and the brief but terrifying spate of violence it unleashed, failed to make much more than a dent in the market.

Businessmen are more worried than brokers, but all agree it will take more than Ms Bhutto’s death to destroy this boom, which has been based on open-door investment policies and privatisation.

“It’s sad, and it does affect the business, but I guess it’s been happening for so long that people just get used to it,” shrugged Omer Sabir, who sells luxury sports cars from upwards of $100,000 each at Karachi’s only Porsche dealer.

Home to 14 million people, Pakistan’s biggest city is booming.

The city has seen property prices soar and shopping malls sprout up.

Foreign banks such as Standard Chartered and ABN Amro have bought up local banks. Just this month Bank Muscat and Japan’s Nomura Holdings agreed to a $200 million takeover of Saudi Pak Bank.

Barclays is also looking to build a local business.

Even during frequent power blackouts, local bankers can see by the light of their generators that profits are good, among the strongest bank returns in the world, says Invisor Securities.

At Karachi’s underground night-club scene – literally, underground – sons and daughters of the upper middle-class drink in glittering semi-darkness and listen to DJs play the latest beats.









Joseph
Karachi, Pakistan
Jan 15, 2008 12:00 AM
24
Please read this Mr Anand and ponder. Thank You.

Two......

TIME TO SELL?

But right now, the party might be coming to an end.

The stock market is still trading just 3 per cent below its highest closing mark (14,814.85 points), but the outlook is far less certain than six years ago, when President Pervez Musharraf began his reforms, spurring local and foreign investment.The economy, which averaged around 7 per cent annual growth in the five years to June 2007, is slowing and inflation is rising. Foreign investment and the farm sector, two important drivers of Pakistan’s economic success story, have also moved down a gear.

The street is also getting angry.

For many Pakistanis, the boom has been mainly a spectator sport. They can see the new shopping malls but cannot afford to buy anything there. About a quarter of them still live in poverty, earning around Rs1,000 rupees a month, though the proportion has been falling, according to 2006 government data.A few blocks away from the Porsche dealership, men and women queue in vain for hours to buy a bag of flour at a government store. Power blackouts make the winter bleaker still.

So if these Pakistanis find their voice in elections scheduled for Feb 18, will there be changes in store for broad economic policy and the rich crust of Pakistan society?

The answer from businessmen, political analysts and economists seems to be a unanimous but rather hopeful “no”.

Religious parties, and their campaigns against Western decadence and corruption, appeal strongly to the poor, but recent polling suggests the mainstream parties will dominate the next government, assuming the Feb 18 elections are free and fair.

The PPP, Pakistan’s biggest, has been campaigning under the slogan ‘Food, shelter, clothing’ and still plans to contest the elections, but political analysts do not expect it to usher in a state-driven economy if it wins power.

“The overall direction of the Pakistan economy would be the same,” said political analyst Hasan Askari Rizvi. — Reuters










Joseph
Karachi, Pakistan
Jan 15, 2008 12:00 AM
23
Grossly over-exaggerated, Mr. Vinod.
Joseph
Karachi, Pakistan
Jan 15, 2008 12:00 AM
22
Welcome back Joseph. Ganpat Ram is posting away as Thomasmid, so you can still have fun with him.
Ghulam Y Faruki
New York, United States
Jan 15, 2008 12:00 AM
21
Are you serious, Thomas?. No more of Mr. Ganpat Ram for us to savour?. Really?.
Joseph
Karachi, Pakistan
Jan 15, 2008 12:00 AM
20
Parbat/Ramdas/Sandhu/Abdullah/Thomas,

>> I would have used harsher language, only you will seize on it to get me thrown off the website like poor old Ganpat Ram.

When your Thomas ass was kicked out by Outlook during the Danish cartoon controversy, I had nothing to do with it. Honest!
Ghulam Y Faruki
New York, United States
Jan 14, 2008 12:00 AM
19
Prabat: You wrote 'Why can't Indians simply have the decency to admit that the racial slur was wrong, apologize and move on?'

So my question to you is if Harbhajan never called him a Monkey, why should Indian team apologize?

Why should you believe the word of Symonds over Harbhajans? May be Harbhajan said maa ke Ch**t and Symonds could have heard it wrong. How do you know who is telling the truth?
Suresh Kamath
Edison, United States
Jan 14, 2008 12:00 AM
18
Prabat: You wrote 'Why can't Indians simply have the decency to admit that the racial slur was wrong, apologize and move on?'

So my question to you is if Harbhajan never called him a Monkey, why should Indian team apologize?

Why should you believe the word of Symonds over Harbhajans? May be Harbhajan said maa ke Ch**t and Symonds could have heard it wrong. How do you know who is telling the truth?
Suresh Kamath
Edison, United States
Jan 14, 2008 12:00 AM
17
Ghulam Faruki:

I am BACK !

Had a very good break in Richmond, B.C.

What a shamingly petty-minded lot the Indians are....

At times I feel totally ashamed to be of Indian descent.

Why can't Indians simply have the decency to admit that the racial slur was wrong, apologise and move on?

Sometimes Indians seem so unbelievably mean.

I would have used harsher language, only you will seize on it to get me thrown off the website like poor old Ganpat Ram.
Parbat Laldeng
Denver, United States
Jan 14, 2008 12:00 AM
16
Bodh,

"Anyways, calling someone a monkey, is more a disparagement and denigration than a term of endearment, even when you say something like "come here you little monkey"...meaning, you're less than I am "

>> Your expert comment that "monkey" is denigrating is redundant. Every Indian understands that whatever Harbhajan said to Symonds wasn't endearing - we know players mouth off. Symonds and Harbhajan weren't proposing a date, they were having a verbal spat. The point is saying something DENIGRATING does not make someone a RACIST. "Idiot" "Duffer" etc are also denigrating ... does that make them racist?
Anand
Santa Clara, USA
Jan 13, 2008 12:00 AM
15
Mir is right on the money - Indians are no stranger themselves to racism, as they too practise a form of this egregious evil - only here it's called caste. And having lived myself the better part of three decades in these here United Sates, I know a thing or two about the attitudes of Indians towards people of African heritage.
'Pot calling the kettle black', perhaps? Anyways, calling someone a monkey, is more a disparagement and denigration than a term of endearment, even when you say something like "come here you little monkey"...meaning, you're less than I am.
Bodh
Springfield, United States
Jan 12, 2008 12:00 AM
14
Kumble writes in an Outlook column,

"let me state at the outset, and quite unequivocally—I am convinced that Harbhajan Singh made no racist remark against Andrew Symonds"

"I talked with Sachin Tendulkar and I talked with Harbhajan himself."

"He assured me that he made no racist remark, that he never even had any intention of doing so."

>> Harbhajan may not be the epitome of honesty but he's denied saying anything racist, as has Sachin Tendulkar. He has to be innocent unless there has been at least SOME evidence (audio, video etc). Given an option, I'm more likely to take the words of Sachin who was standing right next to Harbhajan over tinpot, selfrighteous armchair journalists like Mr. Viveka here.
Anand
Santa Clara, USA
Jan 12, 2008 12:00 AM
13
Viveka,

"Considering that an article is being floated in an MSM newspaper that HBS might have said something in Punjabi that "sounds like" monkey but isn't racist and that he might agree to having uttered the "offensive but not racist term" gives ample evidence that he said it."

>> An armchair journalist like you knows the truth, while Kumble, Sachin and everyone else who said that Harbhajan didn't say anything racist are liars? There have been reports that he may have said something offensive but not racist - Harbhajan could have said "maa ki #@$#&", which could easily have been mistaken for "monkey". I'm glad that you are not racist - but please save us from your self-righteousness. Don't "project" your stereotype of Indian racism on Harbhajan. He's innocent until proven guilty.

"So don't tell Kallu or Chinky-eyed are innocent descriptors. So feckless! You bring disgrace to efforts of Indians who are genuine victims of racism."

>> You want to be self-righteous and show moral superiority on an online forum. If you think you're the only one with a moral compass, sir you're just plain wrong. I don't need to boast about my "anti-racist" behavior on these forums. Plus, I never said calling people "chinks" "kallus" or "makkus" is innocent. I said that Indians aren't racist just when it comes to blacks (this is what Mir Ali says in his essay) - we have names for every race!
Anand
Santa Clara, USA
Jan 12, 2008 12:00 AM
12
Bravo!

Considering that an article is being floated in an MSM newspaper that HBS might have said something in Punjabi that "sounds like" monkey but isn't racist and that he might agree to having uttered the "offensive but not racist term" gives ample evidence that he said it.

I think the on-going Indian muscle flexing, the safai about monkey god and the feckless Anand's phlegmatic but facetious attempt to conjure up a uniform slippery slope of human behavior that somehow blends racism in are are all highly deplorable. I'm glad the author, who has dealt with all the issues clearly, started on the high note #1.

Only a month ago I almost broke friendship after rebuking a longtime and close friend, a fellow Indian-American, for casually passing a "stinky" remark at Chinese neighbors dining by a roadside window. He has shaped up well after a few weeks of break.

So don't tell Kallu or Chinky-eyed are innocent descriptors. So feckless! You bring disgrace to efforts of Indians who are genuine victims of racism.
Viveka P
San Francisco, United States
Jan 12, 2008 12:00 AM
11
Photonman,

"I don't see how the author's comments on racism in the US is relevant to this topic. In my opinion, this whole Harbhajan-Symonds drama is simply a case of the Australians not being used to sledging by a foreign player. Period."

>> Agreed. It is just an opportunity for some bleeding heart liberal indians to make stereotypical generalizations about how racist middle class indians are. We all know we can be racist at times - we don't need our own people to stereotype us all as "racist."
Anand
Santa Clara, USA
Jan 12, 2008 12:00 AM
10
I don't see how the author's comments on racism in the US is relevant to this topic. In my opinion, this whole Harbhajan-Symonds drama is simply a case of the Australians not being used to sledging by a foreign player. Period.
photonman1
Hyderabad, India
Jan 12, 2008 12:00 AM
9
Satadru,

"Middle-class Indians and NRIs are often disgustingly racist when it comes to blacks"

>> I do agree that the monkey God argument is hokey. But care to explain what sort of research you've done to prove that middle-class indians and NRIs are "often" racist toward blacks? How many indians and NRIs have you met/researched? Blanket statements like these or painting NRIs in poor light won't get us anywhere. It has become a habit of Indians and some elite NRIs to constantly criticize NRIs, as if we represent the combined worst of indian and western cultures.

>> BTW, how many insults do sikhs have to endure because of their beard and turbans? Harbhajan has been constantly called the "Turbanator" even by the mainstream english and australian media. Isn't that a derogatory comment about his faith and religion?

>> Its sickening to see people condone racism. At the same time, people want to foolishly give blacks the moral upper hand when it comes to racist issues. Blacks are notoriously racist as well - its just that they don't have the social or economic power to do harm in the US. Just look at the butchering of tribes who look slightly different (The lighter skinned Hutu vs the darker Tutsi) or the treatment of Indian descendants and whites in Uganda, Zimbabwe etc. and we know racism is alive and well in the african continent as well.

>> Besides Symonds' behavior on-field is poor. He easily plays victim because he is aborigine - people whom the WHITE australians massacred without remorse. We don't have to pay for racist crimes committed by white australians. Nor do we have to let Australians define what is racist/offensive etc. and what's not.

>> Also lets face it. Symonds does sometimes look like he's out of the army of the Orcs in the Lord of the Rings - it has nothing to do with his race, but his appearance, dreadlocks and all.
Anand
Santa Clara, USA
Jan 12, 2008 12:00 AM
8
Middle-class Indians and NRIs are often disgustingly racist when it comes to blacks, and it's highly embarrassing to see the "But to us monkey is like God only!" excuses being trotted out on Harbhajan Singh's behalf. The incident in Sydney, however, probably has more to do with the hostile on-field atmosphere than anti-black prejudice. If Harbhajan did call Symonds a monkey (something that is unproven but not unlikely), he has been very foolish and should be fined for that alone. It was no secret to him that Symonds objected to the epithet. Symonds (who seems to have provoked the incident with his confrontational behavior) is hardly a holy innocent either. They should be condemned to insult each other until one man concedes defeat.



Satadru Sen
St. Louis, USA
Jan 12, 2008 12:00 AM
7
Mr. Husain's article was timely, but I disagree with his oversimplification of Indian "racism."

Did the indian crowds make monkey chants when the West Indies played in India? Did they direct it at Makhaya Ntini? I don't think so.

NRIs do call blacks "kallus." But we also call Mexicans "makkus," Asians (Chinese etc) "chinkis" and whites "goras." They are all driven by appearance and are often used pejoratively, but which society doesn't describe people based on their looks? Indians certainly respect communities that are educated, prosperous and respected.

The big problem with racist bias becomes institutionalized and prevents people from looking at other communities objectively. At a government level, allowing an individual's racist bias to make decisions in a corporate, public setting is against the law - and it SHOULD be strongly enforced. But do we really also need mind controls to "cleanse" people of their racist bias altogether?

An NRI refuses to shop in majority black areas, we believe Chinese are all "stinky and dirty" and Mexicans are only capable of working at Taco Bell.

Well, you see the human mind is trained to look for patterns. If a guy has a menacing face, we are wired to wince and be afraid. If a woman is beautiful, we are wired to check her out. These may not be the "right" reactions nor are they politically correct. But absent other information, in a complex world, such "stereotyping" is an unfortunate, but sometimes useful tool for humans to make decisions.

Some brahmins won't even eat at a nonbrahmin household. Pious muslims only buy meat from halal stores. They look down on idolworshippers, alcoholics etc. Christian evangelists look down on nonchristians because they believe they "go to hell." Atheists think religious people are all iditios and have negative perceptions of them. Should we call this "religious racism" and ban this too?
Anand
Santa Clara, USA
Jan 11, 2008 12:00 AM
6
If Harbhajan is guilty, he should be punished. If he has the b@lls (both kinds of balls), he would win cricket fair and square without using racist slurs. That is more honorable. Some retarded Desis, no matter how ugly and dark they are refer to people of African origin as Kallus (they don't have any education to know that they have some "Kallu" genes in them too). They act as 'whites' even in India when it comes to reference to the 'tribals' in India. They start crying foul when they are at the receiving end. Calling someone a 'monkey' is a racial slur. If Harbhajan has called the Aussie a monkey, he should be punished. However, the yardstick should be applied on the whites as well when they resort to racist slurs.
Raj
Chicago, United States
Jan 11, 2008 12:00 AM
5
The Indian team shouldn't try to match the Australians in sledging or reacting to it and in the process overstep the bounds of civility. Instead the BCCI should use its power to totally ban any interaction between players of opposite teams during play. No mutterin from wicketkeeper or close fielders. Use stump microphones or add microphones to fields to enforce.

Indians shouldn't just be outraged by unjust laws or behaviour and expect others to change. Instead we need to develop a culture of MAKING laws, abiding by them, and making others abide by them.
Ashish K
Cambridge, USA
Jan 11, 2008 12:00 AM
4
A well-written, succint piece. The deep-rooted racism that is prevalent in many societies, including India, has not just ruined sport, but proactively supports the most inhuman atrocities of them all - murder, torture and war. Many, if not most of the priviliged people, like whites in the United States and the "higher" caste people in India, do not realize that racism is structural and manipulated in many subtle and overt ways by power. And there is no doubt that in some ways, non-resident Indians become a small part of the racist project in the United States against the African American community. An insightful look at this co-option that is taking place is The Karma of Brown Folk, by Vijay Prashad.
Hari Chathrattil
Syracuse, USA
Jan 11, 2008 12:00 AM
3
Excellent article, Mr. Husain! Everything you wrote is true.
Ashish K
Cambridge, USA
Jan 11, 2008 12:00 AM
2
We-Indians- are very racist people and rather than being defennsive, we all need to learn to respect others.

We do not realize that we are hurting others feelings but when it happen to us only then we raise a hell.

peace
Ajay
Troy, usa
Jan 11, 2008 12:00 AM
1
Good points. A well written piece.
Ghulam Y Faruki
New York, United States
COLLAPSE COMMENTS   
Post a Comment
You are not logged in, please log in or register
ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISING RATES | COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER | COMMENTS POLICY