Response
In Praise Of The Native Intellectual
Or how to rubbish all those who don't agree with you, get up your nose, yank your goat, or articulate critique and are likely, in any way, to challenge your undisputed supremacy as Pundit of the Postcolonial Nation. A response to Ramachandra Guha
A 'native intellectual', suggested Frantz Fanon, the great freedom fighter from Martinique, is essential to the development of any great nation as it comes into its own after decades of colonization. Fanon, a complex thinker by nature, evolved a whole theory of how intellectuals could and should participate in the life of their country. They had to find ways to engage with ordinary people and their aspirations and to think about the many meanings of freedom, justice and democracy beyond simply replacing white rulers with black or brown ones. Native intellectuals would need, above all, to discard their smug complacency, learn to be self-critical and forge international alliances with like-minded others. (Though from Martinique, he himself worked alongside the Algerian anti-colonial movement).  

But these old freedom fighter types, our own Gandhi and Tagore included, really were rather long-winded and needlessly sophisticated. Who can blame them? They missed the cyber age where we do things faster and with a lot less agonizing over details and nuance. Here, in India, we can now produce the New and Authentic National Intellectual (NANI) in double-quick time, futta-fut. Here's how you can become one in Ten Easy Steps: 

1. First, position yourself at all times as the Real Indian, the one who stayed behind selflessly to serve nation and countrymen while others have departed for foreign shores. You have remained (or returned) to live the simple life in your old family pile in Alipore or Prithviraj Road or Benson Town.  

2. Locate a handy counterfoil, a Ravan to your Ram. These are easy enough to find. Rummage through the heaving NRI hordes coming back to (your) home this December. A couple of likely prototypes immediately present themselves. In practice, they may be polar opposites and sworn enemies, but that should not deter you from handily clubbing them together. So, take a rabid Hindu chauvinist and a secular academic-activist and pop-psychoanalyse both as alienated losers who have lost their way by living away from the motherland. The fact that their politics and views may have been formed during their long years growing up or studying in India is neither here nor there. Where the academic is concerned, long years of published research into Indian history, culture or economics is also irrelevant.  

3. This will also enable you to place yourself as the Eminently Reasonable man in the middle between two Extremes. The truth, of course, is geographically certified, to lie 'in-between.' Anyone who thinks that this position (like Tony Blair's Third Way) is somewhat facile and easily arrived at is an extremist to begin with anyway. 

4. A NANI, while selfless, also needs to eat. Fear not, you do not actually need to lecture at an Indian college or work for the Indian civil services to earn your daily bread. That would needlessly fetter your creativity. Write popular books which will be widely sold in the free and individual West where they love their 'native' writers anyway. (If one of these books can praise NRFs or Non-Resident Firangs who devote their lives to India and her 'tribes,' so much the better). The royalties will keep you in Fab India silk kurtas for the rest of your life. Please note that this is different from and vastly morally superior to actually living in one of these grey northern lands and getting your grubby monthly paycheck (from which income tax is actually deducted) there.  

5. If you need to do research for your books in well-resourced libraries, you can easily get lucrative visiting fellowships or short-term teaching contracts at Cambridge or Harvard or Yale. (After all, you cannot really be expected to produce your words of wisdom sitting at the decaying National Library or even swish Teen Murti alone). This way, you can retain the glow of rectitude that being a Resident Indian gives you. Jet-setting and networking with the Global Great and the Good is, in any case, a form of national service.  

6. Relatedly, don't worry too much if you yourself have undertaken your undergraduate or graduate study at one of these prestigious foreign institutions or even if you have taught there for a while. But please, do take due care to underplay this where you can or it may seriously affect your ability to be perceived as a real NANI. You need to be able to roundly denounce the Indian academics who live and teach abroad without any hint of compromise on your end. You, after all, are sweating it out on the coalface at the IIC or Habitat Centre while they are swanning around in New Haven or Warwick. These suckers actually teach for a living.    

7. Now, while you dutifully condemn religious chauvinists (as all refined people must, dear boy) you must not lose sight of your real bete noire. This is what you term the 'Non-Resident Political Radical' (NRPR) -- professionals and academics based abroad (there being, of course, no political radicals or 'desi leftists' in India itself). This type of academic don is the real threat to national well-being and security. In terms of the calendar year, they may spend just as much time in India as you do abroad, but they must be reminded at every possible turn that they, unlike you, are Inauthentic and Deluded. So write vitriolic denunciations of Indian academics abroad at every available opportunity, including in academic books published abroad. Remember, you cannot do this too often.  

8. Remind everyone that you yourself have your fingers on the Pulse of the Masses. (If challenged, point out that you have servants which even the most well-paid of these NRI types don't, certainly not the dons). The Masses, you can assure us unequivocally (because, after all, you talk to your bai, driver and mali) are unanimously in favour of every unfettered aspect of globalization. Oh, yes, even when it means loss of land or livelihood, polluted water supplies or ill-treatment in a Gap supply-chain sweatshop. Small price to pay for India Shining after all. And remember, Non-Resident Capital is far superior to Non-Resident Indians unless the latter happen to be providing the former. These useless NR-academics don't have two pennies to invest into a Bangalore start-up anyway.  

9. If Indian academics who happen to be based abroad raise questions about the possible downsides of unchecked globalization, you can toss them into the dustbin of history in one fell swoop. Again, conflating different historical and political contexts is a handy tool--Cuba, China, Burma, Kazakhstan, the Congo--all are socialist 'autarkic autocracies' which these deluded dons want to transform our beloved nation into. (You can take the opportunity to reveal the hitherto little-known fact that Burmese generals are apparently seeking to convert their country into a socialist utopia, along with the big oil companies who are, of course, well-known supporters of socialism).  Like McCarthy did for the United States, simply imply that all dissent is part of a vast anti-Indian left-wing conspiracy. If the (non-existent) desi leftist writer or intellectual based in India happens to also dare to voice critique, write a vicious denunciatory screed and dispatch them into obscurity forthwith. 

10. Finally, and this is important so that you too not become alienated like them, end your perorations on a constructive note. This can be done with a soothing paean to all 'humans' to which category the 'right sort' of NRI are deemed to belong. Humans are people who agree with you. They don't get up your nose, yank your goat, or articulate critique. Above all, they are unlikely, in any way, to challenge your undisputed supremacy as Pundit of the Postcolonial Nation.  


Priyamvada 'Main Hoon Don' Gopal is a suspected NRPR who has just tumbled off the plane from Cambridge/London at Bangalore Airport

 
Daily Mail
COLLAPSE COMMENTS :
HAVE YOUR SAY
Dec 25, 2007 12:00 AM
31
As I waited for my host to pick me up at the Bangalore airport, I heard someone say that a NANI, Ramchandra Guha, bumped into a suspected NRPR, Priyamvada Gopal in the passenger lounge. I briefly followed the crowd to take a look. There was this war of words we know in India as argument going on between the two. My inquisitive mind quickly discovered as I tapped on witnesses around that Guha, standing in the middle of the lounge, was screaming at arriving NRIs. “He had some deep-rooted problem with them.” I heard someone say. Gopal, who just tumbled off from plane from Cambridge/London, I guess, could not take it from a stranger and an argument thus ensued. With my brief enchantment with that halla-gulla soon over, I looked around for my host. I spotted him standing next to Guha and Gopal, shifting looks back and forth on the warring parties. In fact, he was now walking away from the crowd perhaps to find me. Soon, we faced each other. No greetings, just blank looks with a wry smile as we both plucked ourselves off the crowd. My host was seemingly apologetic and offered, “Guha has gone senile. His history lessons could not stop hordes of young Indians leaving the country for some meaningful life elsewhere.” “But, he was out in the West researching for his books on Indian history.” I told him. “What happened?” I asked. “It was the subject of his work that brought him back home. He could instead teach a course or two on Indian history at Cambridge or change his profession altogether to stay behind.” He suggested. My clever host sensed the gravity and seriousness of the event and changing the subject, asked me if I liked Malamaal Weekly, I had recently wrote him about in my email. “Don’t you think Guha behaves like Baje in the Malamaal Weekly?—I mean at the end; while every one shows gratitude to Anthony, Baje smears…” He said.
P. Paul
Kartarpur, India
Dec 22, 2007 12:00 AM
30
Oo la la, Ms Priyamvada!
SIMPLY LOVED YOUR REPARTEE- LOVEDIT, LOVED IT, LOVED IT! The condescending NANIs had it coming; in fact it was long overdue!!! Is it the green eyed monster behind these NANIs ?
S.K
hamden, United States
Dec 21, 2007 12:00 AM
29
What a lot of patronising, generalising twaddle. If one is to take this article at face value, no Indian, of whatever political persuasion, who lives in this country has any right to an opinion.
Biswapriya Purkayastha
Shillong, India
Dec 21, 2007 12:00 AM
28
Sriram,

I was unable to think of more ideas from the left sect to balance the representation. Others can add ideas that I have missed. And, left ideas are easir to express thanright ideas..thus they seem to attract more justification.

Thanks. And to you too, Parbat. I enjoyed your letters as well.
Narasimhan M.G
Bangalore, India
Dec 21, 2007 12:00 AM
27
Parbat, maybe you're being unduly harsh on Narasimhan. If you read below, you will find him representing "left" as well as "right" sects. Though of course the items in the "right" sect are more numerous and mysteriously seem to attract more justification.

I fully endorse your comments on how Indian intellectuals in cushy jobs shamelessly use Fanon.
Sriram K
Delhi, India
Dec 21, 2007 12:00 AM
26
Finally. I'm so tired of reading Guha's idiotic rants. His instincts are often in the right place but he sadly lacks the intellectual capability or sophistication to ever elucidate upon them and suffocates himself and the reader with his inaccurate portrayals of a) what exactly pisses him off, and b) where he fits into it all.
Bev
new york, United States
Dec 20, 2007 12:00 AM
25
Narasimhan:

You should apply to enter a museum, as an exhibit of a Brahminical fossil.
Parbat Laldeng
Denver, United States
Dec 20, 2007 12:00 AM
24
Narasimhan,

>> Precednet exists for reconciliation and expression of transcendet unity among the ancient sects. But prospect seems bleak for the modern sects.

I share your pessimism.
Ghulam Y Faruki
New York, United States
Dec 20, 2007 12:00 AM
23
Right Sect:-
1. Religion will inevitably influence politics. Nothing wrong with it, it accords with our civilisational values.
2. Minorities are being appeased in the name of secularism
3. India is a Hindu country, the only nation with a Hindu majority
4. The Aryans did not come from outside. Arya is a linguistic term meaning noble. Dravida merely means “South of the Vindhyas”. There never was a race called Aryans. The Aryan invasion theory is false, a concoction of colonial Britain. It’s a divide-and-rule stratagem, eagerly adapted by secularists.
5. Islamists invaded and conquered India. Medieval Indian history is filled with forced conversions, destruction of temples, rape and plunder of Hindu treasures. This needs to be properly documented and settled.
6. The establishment historians have deliberately falsified Indian history under the direction of their secularist patrons. They have denigrated ancient Indian history and whitewashed medieval Indian history. The communists have been specially active in this field.
7. India’s traditional, Gurukula based education kept the people in touch with their roots. This was deliberately destroyed by Thomas Macaulay in 1863. He wrote in his minute that the goal was to establish a class of people who were European in thought, taste, opinions and life-style, and Indian in skin colour alone. They were to help rule India for the British empire. This system of education has continued in Independent India and has resulted in unawareness of our roots and identity.
8. The caste system was a system of specialization according to kind of work done by the individuals. It was useful in the ancient times. It gradually degenerated due to the invasions. Many other practices, like johar, sati, and segregation of women were also defensive responses to Islam’s depredations. It is definitely necessary to reform these, but no need for eternal shame about it.
9. Nehruvian socialism is dead. India has regained its national energy due to the reforms. Globalization has been positive in the economic field, but the cultural impact has been negative. Intervention in the name of equality is harmful and leads to counter-productive perpetuation of caste identities in society.
10. Reservations are inherently anti-meritocratic. They discriminate against the so-called upper castes, taking advantage of their numerical weakness. Originally it was supposed to be for a limited period of 10 years, and a max. limit of 33% was specified. But now states like Tamilnadu have a 67% reservation and politicians find it to be a goldmine of vote banks. They have a vested interest in keeping society divided officially on a caste basis. Castes now compete to be called backward. This divides Hindu society in particular and makes the nation weak.
11. Corruption is a bane on Indian society. The cleansing of politics and public life should be at the top of the national agenda, ahead of welfare programs.

Precednet exists for reconciliation and expression of transcendet unity among the ancient sects. But prospect seems bleak for the modern sects.
Narasimhan M.G
Bangalore, India
Dec 20, 2007 12:00 AM
22
Modern sects.

Left Sect:-
1.Religion should not be mixed up with politics.
2.Minorities should be guaranteed protection
.India is a multi-national, multi-racial, multi-ethnic, artificial entity established by British rule.
4.The Aryan invasion theory is valid i.e. Aryans are Caucasians who came from Central Asia and South Russia, invaded and displaced the Dravidians and drove them south. They established their kingdoms in North India.
5.Islam’s arrival in India was not all that violent. They came mainly as traders, merchants, sometimes as warriors. The spread of Islam in India was fairly peaceful. Their rule largely benefited India.
6.The Europeans and the British brought modern ideas to a decaying India. Though they colonized and exploited India, they also introduced much needed reforms. It is necessary to strengthen such reforms.
7.India’s caste system is evil. It should be destroyed by means of social, legal and state intervention.
8.Social and economic equality, by state intervention and social engineering are a prime necessity. Reservations for backward classes and dalits are a part of this program and should be expanded to include new classes of people – including muslims.

continued...
Narasimhan M.G
Bangalore, India
Dec 20, 2007 12:00 AM
21
Gopal’s complaint - A couple of likely prototypes immediately present themselves. In practice, they may be polar opposites and sworn enemies, but that should not deter you from handily clubbing them together. So, take a rabid Hindu chauvinist and a secular academic-activist and pop-psychoanalyse both as alienated losers who have lost their way by living away from the motherland. T

Her grouse is that Guha clubs Amartya Sen (AS) with V.S. Naipaul (VSN). Note the unkind pejorative for VSN contra worshipful description of AS.

Apparently Guha is oblivious to nuance. His snide attempt is to denigrate the obvious God of the leftists with the demon of the rightists. It is interesting to note how tribal her paradigms are. These tribalisms have a precedent in the sectarian strife between India’s Saivite and Vaishnavite sects of medieval India. To elaborate:

Saivism:
1. Ascetism. Strong austerities.
2. Phallus worship and fertility rites.
3. Salvation through dissolution of the 3 bodies of the self – Siva as Tripuranthaka
4. Tendency to be away from society
5. Indifference to creation and creatures
6. Both vegetarianism and non-vegetarianism allowed, according to caste.
7. Deeper research and practice of spirituality through sex – Kundalini.
8. Violence and “gross” practices allowed. Kapaalika, Shaktheya, Bhairava, Aghora etc. “Vama maarga”.
9. Advaitha – Philosophical Monism

Vaishnavism:
1. Family life
2. Lesser austerities
3. Importance of society. Sociable personality development.
4. Importance of preserving creation and creatures.
5. Puritanism and discouragement of spiritual-sexual explorations.
6. Salvation through devotion. Several forms – Lover, Child, Mother/Father, Friend etc.
7. Normally non-violent and vegetarian.
8. Dvaitha and Vishistadvaitha – Dualism and Qualified Monism.

Mythological instances
1.Vishnu takes avatars to slay demons who always are devotees of Siva.
2.Siva foolishly granting boons to demons (Mohini-Bhasmasura). Vishnu repairs damage.
3.Vishnu worships Siva with 999 lotuses. Offers own eyes for the 1000th lotus. Is granted the Vishnu chakra by Siva.
4.Vishnu is unable to measure the infinite depth of Siva’s Jyothirlinga, confesses it and is granted a boon.
5.Siva marries Vishnu in female form and begets a child (Ayyappa). Note that Shiva is the man here.
6.As Lord Sarabheswara, Shiva engages Lord Narasimha (an avatar of Vishnu) in combat after the slaying of demon Hiranyakashipu, to quell his rage.

continued...
Narasimhan M.G
Bangalore, India
Dec 20, 2007 12:00 AM
20
Hey Madam!!???

What's got your goat so strongly??

You've got lost.

Please return.

Atul Chandra
mUMBAI, INDIA
Dec 20, 2007 12:00 AM
19
Parbat writes:

>>regurgitating your tired and dreary cliches endlessly, without one original thought.

Hello. Pot? This is kettle. You are black.
Augustus aaa
Pune, India
Dec 20, 2007 12:00 AM
18
Whoa!!! You have to take a look at this!! Priyamvada Gopal lashing back at Ram Guha!!!!
Aparna
New Delhi, India
Dec 20, 2007 12:00 AM
17
The highpoint of this article seems to be Mz. Gopal’s fetching mug. After that, the article heads downhill. By adding two more steps to her ten-step program slightly reformulated, we can have a genuine 12-step recovery program for bad writing. Unfortunately, Gopal’s bad writing obscures a handful of good points she manages to make.

The biggest problem of this poorly written article is that she makes more of Mr. Guha’s article than what probably intended. I thought Guha’s article was a heavy handed and clumsy attempt at humor and wit. I also pointed out where his disorganized and disconnected analysis was lacking. If Gopal is a Non-Resident Political Radical, either real or suspected, who got her dander up because of Guha’s article, she needs to take a chill pill.

I didn’t see Guha position himself as a “Real Indian” or as reasonable man in the middle; even by implication. He didn’t engage in any pop-psychoanalysis of two broad categories of returning NRIs. Instead, he made a simple point those alienated NRIs in the West are adulated here in India. Gopal should relax because she misreads Guha’s Non-Residential Political Radical as his bete-noir instead of a forced attempt at wit that falls flat on its ass. That Guha is an extremist in mild-mannered academic clothing raise questions about Gopal’s perceptive ability. The vehemence with which she berates Guha makes me think she is more than a tad defensive.

Unfortunately, the good points that Gopal makes gets lost in her nuclear-bomb-to-kill-a-mosquito approach. She is absolutely correct that whether it is Techie-Hindu-Religious-Radicals or the Political Radicals, they all have to be productive in the West. Nobody pays them for their looks. If they don't produce, they get fired. In short, they work their tail off. Of course, hard work has very little relevance to the quality of their political beliefs. But, it does contrast with the high decibel bluster that substitutes for near non-productivity of the vast majority that glide through life with half-dozen domestic helpers on this side of the globe.

As an enthusiastic supporter of globalization, I also think Gopal makes a valid point that globalization has its costs. Thinking about those costs and weighing them against its clear and lasting benefits is not necessarily knuckle-dragging as Guha may have implied.
Augustus aaa
Pune, India
Dec 20, 2007 12:00 AM
16
correction: give it a rest, saar.
Hari Chathrattil
Syracuse, USA
Dec 20, 2007 12:00 AM
15
Once bitten, twice shy. Thrice bitten, and I hope Guha finally shies away from what he apparently cannot take on - taking serious or humorous potshots at those he feels threatened by. After Arundhati Roy, William Darlymple, and now, Priyamvada Gopal, give it a rest, s
Gopal has her fingers on Guha's pulse as she pinpoints the NRPR as Guha's real bete-noire, and is spot on regarding attempts to dismiss critiques of neoliberalism and globalization by deliberately obfuscating and muddling the context a la the socialist ideals of the Burmese junta.
Hari Chathrattil
Syracuse, USA
Dec 19, 2007 12:00 AM
14
Have you no shame?

Your piece has only one use: to show us for the nth time what a hideous waste of time and money you academic scribblers are, regurgitating your tired and dreary cliches endlessly, without one original thought.

Naipaul is so right about your crowd: this kind of "liberal arts" education should be ABOLISHED.

You glorify that murderous clown Fanon, who himself glorified bloodshed and wallowed in it. The luckless Algreians never got freedom from Fanon's savage brutes. They got every kind of tyranny and suffering.

You, a smiling Brahminical softie, sit in some cosy New England den, with a fatly-paid little scribbling job, and praise...Fanon !!!!

What obscene grotesquerie!

Fanon would not eat you for breakfast, as you are too bloodless.

Parbat Laldeng
Denver, United States
Dec 19, 2007 12:00 AM
13
that was tedious and unreadable. your rebuttal is pointless, that article was meant in a light vein, while yours is as pretentious, overloaded with earnest references, and eager to be seen as clever -- sort of the prose equivalent of an undergrad in the SOAS bar
tara bohra
new delhi, India
Dec 19, 2007 12:00 AM
12
I enjoyed this spat between two WOGs thoroughly. (Sorry if you think gentleman is not a correct description). Congrats, Guha saab, for bringing out the green-eyed one in Ms Gopal. Now, Ms Gopal, lets hear about the patriotic service your NRPR ilk does, struggling for the poor, huddled masses of India, coummunicating with fellow WOGs like the readers of Outlook. Keep it up, soon you'll wipe every tear from every eye. I did have tears in my eyes, thinking about your middle class existence with a monthly pay check. On the other hand, Guha made me smile.
Narasimhan M.G
Bangalore, India
Dec 19, 2007 12:00 AM
11
Bhattacharyya,

>> Faruki, This one, for you.

We already have enough hate mongers in this forum, but you seem to be the most juvenile of them all.
Ghulam Y Faruki
New York, United States
Dec 19, 2007 12:00 AM
10
B Bhattacharyya
Morrisville, USA
Dec 19, 2007 12:00 AM
9
Chaplin Charlie , more info from


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Chaplin


Although Chaplin had his major successes in the United States and was a resident from 1914 to 1952, he always retained his British nationality. During the era of McCarthyism, Chaplin was accused of "un-American activities" as a suspected communist sympathizer and J. Edgar Hoover, who had instructed the FBI to keep extensive secret files on him, tried to end his United States residency. FBI pressure on Chaplin grew after his 1942 campaign for a second European front in the war and reached a critical level in the late 1940s, when Congressional figures threatened to call him as a witness in hearings. This was never done, probably from fear of Chaplin's ability to lampoon the investigators.[5] This was probably a wise decision, as Chaplin later stated that, if called, he wanted to appear dressed in his Tramp costume.[citation needed]

In 1952, Chaplin left the US for what was intended as a brief trip home to the United Kingdom for the London premiere of Limelight. Hoover learned of the trip and negotiated with the Immigration and Naturalization Service to revoke Chaplin's re-entry permit. Chaplin decided not to re-enter the United States, writing; ".....Since the end of the last world war, I have been the object of lies and propaganda by powerful reactionary groups who, by their influence and by the aid of America's yellow press, have created an unhealthy atmosphere in which liberal-minded individuals can be singled out and persecuted. Under these conditions I find it virtually impossible to continue my motion-picture work, and I have therefore given up my residence in the United States."[6]

Chaplin then made his home in Vevey, Switzerland. He briefly and triumphantly returned to the United States in April 1972, with his wife, to receive an Honorary Oscar, and was welcomed warmly.

Chaplin's dissent was misunderstood as sympatisizing communism. This always happens when one brands all dissent as communist. Infact Chaplin's dissent was original, creative, far superior to the communist manifesto. He used motion pictures to express dissent.


gajanan
Sydney, Australia
Dec 19, 2007 12:00 AM
8
Ganesan,

>> McCarthy defeated the communist movement in USA.
>> McCarthy was understating the problem of communist infiltration in the state department.

This comes from excessive patronizing of Fox News, Washington Times and Russ Limbaugh!
Ghulam Y Faruki
New York, United States
Dec 19, 2007 12:00 AM
7
Charlie Chaplin, the genius, was he a victim of McCarthyism? or he just like the Swiss Alps for creativity.
gajanan
Sydney, Australia
Dec 19, 2007 12:00 AM
6
The editors are sleeping on the job.
B Bhattacharyya
Morrisville, USA
Dec 19, 2007 12:00 AM
5
Guilty feelings for staying abroad are unwarranted in the first place, so excessive defensiveness does not strike any chords.
Ghulam Y Faruki
New York, United States
Dec 19, 2007 12:00 AM
4
"Like McCarthy did for the United States, simply imply that all dissent is part of a vast anti-Indian left-wing conspiracy"

McCarthy defeated the communist movement in USA. His most notorious cases-like Owen lattimore or Annie Lee Moss were all proven communist agents as confirmed by the Venona documents. And moreover, the recently declassified FBI documents can be used to show that McCarthy was understating the problem of communist infiltration in the state department. And McCarthy knew fraction of what the FBI knew.

This is just a standard trick to silence any criticism of liberals by crying McCarthyism. Nobody bothers to see whether the cases mentioned him were indeed commie agents. And long before McCarthy entered politics, there were FOUR different congressional committies that had voiced concerns about the commie infiltration in various branches of govt(the committies were formed in the mid thirties when McCarthy was not even in politics). So the idea that McCarthy invented the communist bogey to scare people is flat out wrong.

Same with the left in India. They have always taken a position that would benefit USSR or China-not India. The most glaring example being 1962. The woman has no clue what she is talking about.
Ganesan
Nj, USA
Dec 19, 2007 12:00 AM
3


Don't be surprised, if www.outlookindia.com turns out to be a blog, soon.

I'm not sure if the author manually typed those phrases and sentences or grumbled holding a mike into a software. The language appears to have been literally screwed up. Many redudant puntuations that eat your cells up.

Indians live or work abroad mostly use shitty English than the ones studied at convents in India.

TOEFL can not impart intelligence as deeply and logically as your schools do. can it? hehehe....

One broken pot is trying call a rustic kettle BLACK.
Sasi KC
Reston, United States
Dec 19, 2007 12:00 AM
2
Right on, Priyamvada. The unsaid implication of Guha's articles such as this one (and the notorious tirade against Arundhati Roy) is:
- Noone should speak out for any cause that they believe in.
- Instead they should tie themselves in knots thinking about how some armchair pundit like Guha would find it inappropriate or hypocritical for them to speak out on that topic in the first place (though the said armchair pundit does not condescend to argue out the issue itself)
- Having tied up in knots and gagged oneself, everyone should be content enjoying the comforts of modern life, and reading books on cricket, history or pop psychology, which give the armchair pundits assured income.

Guha applies the above expectations quite broad-mindedly to both residents,non-residents and all varieties in between. The barbs on NRPR only form a recent variation, which I hope someone else pop-psychoanalyzes to provide some much-needed entertainment to one and all.

Kiran
Kirankumar Vissa
Rockville, MD, USA
Dec 19, 2007 12:00 AM
1
Test
Ganesan
Nj, USA
COLLAPSE COMMENTS   
Post a Comment
You are not logged in, please log in or register
ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISING RATES | COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER | COMMENTS POLICY