Opinion
Is Water The Next Oil?
Motives behind the question vary, depending on who asks the question. But there are lessons to be learned from how we have managed oil on this planet over the past century and more.
BANGALORE: 

Is water the next oil? Motives behind the question vary, depending on who asks the question.

Those who see water as a future core commodity – therefore as profitable a prospect as oil – pose the question to create the right market conditions for water trade. Those who see the potential for conflict arising from scarcity compare diminishing freshwater to oil's depleting reserves. Those who see an environmental threat from mismanagement of water see parallels with the abuse and waste of oil.

So there are lessons to be learned from how we have managed oil on this planet over the past century and more.

The oil crisis confronting the world today is much like the looming crisis in water, with depleting supplies, unequal distribution and access, and the inevitable specter of rising costs and increasing conflict around the sharing of this vital natural resource. As with oil, water exploitation raises an inter-generational debt that will be hard to repay. The uncontrolled and rapacious exploitation of oil has led to unintended consequences, and if we continue on a similar trajectory with water, the oil crisis will seem like the trailer of some horrible disaster movie.

Ironically, our untrammeled use of oil fuels the crisis in water. Burning of fossil fuels has led to global warming, the melting of glaciers and ice caps, and the early snowmelts that will cause flooding in areas that can hardly bear another burden. And it may also cause the climate to fluctuate in a way that brings too much rain in some places and too little in others.

In addition, the move to replace oil with biomass-based fuels will intensify water use, not so much for sustaining our life and this planet as to sustain our lifestyles.

Click here for larger image

All this is worth thinking about at the individual level, because if change really happens, it must begin within the individual consciousness.

The challenges are immense. The first, of course, is that the earth has a finite amount of usable water, despite it being a beautiful blue planet. The 2.5 percent of usable planet water is in a precarious balance with glaciers and fossil groundwater remaining intact.

Another challenge is the inefficiencies and inequities in how water is used. Agriculture consumes 70 percent of the world's water, much of it to produce what we eat. There is tremendous wastage in our agricultural processes, though the levels are somewhat stable or even improving slightly.

Demand for domestic water has risen sharply over the century, which again brings us back to questioning what we as individuals can do. The sectoral demand on water is increasing rapidly within both industry and domestic settings. Competing demand will create pressure on the agriculture sector, perhaps leading water-scarce regions to produce less food and outsource food production to water-rich countries, spurring concerns about the food security of individual nation states.

Poverty, power and inequality are at the core of the water issue and not scarcity, as the UN Development Programme Human Development Report 2006 powerfully argues.

And herein lies the rub. Since we have taken water for granted, we must face the alarming inequality in safe water. More than 1.5 billion people lack access to adequate water and sanitation. If poverty is bad, then poverty without water is hell on earth. Recently, the millennium development goals have supplied a normative framework for governments to prioritize how water is delivered. Still, not enough money or resources flow into this sector. Worldwide, only 5 percent of all international aid goes into water and sanitation. We are still far from universal access to good water for life. And this inequity instigates the raging debate around water today.

Another critical problem for the water sector is wastewater and pollution of our ponds, streams, lakes and rivers. No one can estimate the costs to clean our water resources and how much of the damage is irreversible.

So maybe it is time to apply the lessons learned from the management of another natural resource – oil.

It's safe to say that, with oil, among other mistakes, we have seen overuse; gross inequity in benefit sharing, across both geography and time, of what is essentially a common property; poor environmental management; an overarching supply-side focus; the use of technology to speed unsustainable extraction; and the lack of effective global governance.

For water, therefore, we need to focus on demand management and universal access, affordable pricing, pollution control and source sustainability. We need to use technology not to extract water more efficiently from the bowels of the earth, but to replace the use of water with other means where we can, especially to reverse our use of freshwater to carry human waste. And we need urgently to set up more appropriate platforms for negotiation and regulation that are truly participatory across the globe.

These steps are much easier written about than done. So where should one begin?

Already some work is underway to restore good practices or generate new ones: One example is that of reversing the practice of using water to flush and carry human waste. European cities such as Oslo have introduced vacuum-flush toilet systems that use little or no water. Gaining ground in South Asia is eco-sanitation, which provides a viable alternative to water-borne sewage and also converts human waste into nutrient-rich fertilizer.

For source sustainability, New York City has made a creative breakthrough by supporting the preservation of forests in the watersheds of the Catskill Mountains, after finding it more cost-effective to preserve the watersheds that supply the metro's drinking water than to build costly treatment and source-augmentation plants.

Demand management is perhaps the trickiest issue of all. How do we convince ourselves to use much less water?

Perhaps the urban consumer is the key to solving some of the problems. Urbanites are removed from the natural world, and urban demand fuels new and unsustainable uses of water. And yet, the urbanite is arguably more integrated with the global economy and increasingly understands its pitfalls. If there is to be a change in human consciousness, the urban mind is fertile ground.

We must focus quickly on making the invisible visible. Much of our incompetence stems from a lack of awareness. We need to reduce the knowledge gaps if water consumers are to make more virtuous choices about products and lifestyles that abuse water.

But if such inquiry is to deliver creative solutions, then people must internalize the locus of control. They must see themselves as not only part of the problem but also part of the solution. As a Chinese proverb says, "Tell me, I forget. Show me, I remember. Involve me, I understand."

Among the most important lessons to be taken from the history of oil is not taking essentials for granted. Conserve oil, but also conserve water. If our Hummers are a red flag in oil, maybe our Jacuzzis are the same for water. A new universal water ethic could eliminate our lethal bottleneck of overpopulation and wasteful consumption.

Can the water crisis be prevented from becoming a catastrophe? Can we all change the way we think of water? Now that we know every drop counts, can we count every drop? We will soon find out. And it will be bitter irony if our freshwater reserves are depleted before our oil wells have run dry.


Rohini Nilekani is chairperson of Arghyam, a charitable foundation that supports a safe and sustainable global water supply. Rights: © 2007 Yale Center for the Study of Globalization. YaleGlobal Online

 
Daily Mail
COLLAPSE COMMENTS :
HAVE YOUR SAY
Jun 05, 2007 12:00 AM
6
While some of the issues raised like preservation of watersheds are good, most of this article is inapplicable in the Indian context.

Vacuum flush toilets? Indians can't even afford regular toilets. How will people buy, install and maintain these hundreds of dollars worth of toilets? Where is the electricity to operate these toilets?

Water is renewable unlike oil. Availability in India is so poor (due to lack of infrastructure) that the question of waste doesn't arise - either of oil or water. The only waste is due to leakage from the supply system due to lack of maintenance. What is needed is a massive increase in supply infrastructure and not lectures to the poor on why they should use less than the one bucket that they do when taking a bath?

And all that 2.5% of water on earth being freshwater, availability chart per capita, etc. is bunkum. Water for home usage is a minuscle fraction of fresh water available in the country. How do people in the gulf countries get sufficient water from their taps given their availability is less than that of India? Such scary statistics is only used in India by the elite and the government to evade responsibility.
Ashish K
Cambridge, USA
Jun 05, 2007 12:00 AM
5
Vis-a-vis India, the problem of water availability and management is not only about how we use our water resources, conserve them, manage them etc. It is also about our exploding population. The graphic shows water availability, per capita. One way of tackling the problem is from the supply side as detailed by Rohini Nilekani. But the demand side or controlling population growth is the flip side of the same coin. No one, not even Ms.Nilekani seems to mention it in her article. Unmanageable population size in India is the biggest disaster that is waiting to befall us. Being a politically sensitive issue, no one wants to raise it. But we need to be pragmatic about the problem. The euphoria of India's economic growth hides some ugly scars. Currently, several small plastic surgeries can fix the problem. But if left to fester, Indians would, at a later date, face a major surgery, the pain of which may be too much to bear.
C K Jaidev
Dubai, UAE
Jun 05, 2007 12:00 AM
4
This is what water bottling companies do:

Rural Communities exploited by Nestlé for Your Bottled Water

By Tara Lohan, AlterNet

Posted on May 30, 2007, Printed on June 4, 2007


http://www.alternet.org/story/52526/


Across the country, multinational corporations are targeting hundreds of rural communities to gain control of their most precious resource.

...

An Unfair Contract

For Nestlé, the deal seems too good to be true. The Ashland Free Press broke down some of the details of the contract:

A 50-year term, renewable for another 50 years
The right to take 1,250 gallons per minute of spring water
The right to take qualified water on an interim basis from district's springs for bulk delivery to other bottling facilities located in Northern California
The right to construct pipelines and a loading facility
Use of an unknown quantity of well water for production purposes
Exclusive rights to one of the town's three springs
One hundred years of exclusivity, during which time no other beverage business of any type may exist in McCloud
Use of an undisclosed, perhaps unlimited amount of ground water
The right to require the McCloud Community Service District to dispose of process wastewater
The right to require the McCloud Community Service District to design, construct and install one or more ground water production wells on the bottling facility site for Nestlé's use as a supply for nonspring water purposes.


As if all that weren't enough, under the terms of the contract, Nestlé will make out handsomely. The McCloud Watershed Council has reported that Nestlé will pay .000087 cents per gallon for the water it takes from McCloud's springs. Its website explains:


In other words, that's only 8.7 cents for 100,000 gallons. Meanwhile, the rest of us who use a fraction of what Nestlé will, pay almost 20 bucks each month, just for water. On the other hand, Nestlé can sell a 16-ounce bottle of the same water for around $1.29, or $10.32 per gallon.


It's no wonder that Nestlé wanted to rush the current contract through and is fighting so hard to keep it intact. It's a sweetheart deal for Nestlé, but not for McCloud. At a shelf price of $10.32 per gallon, 1,600 acre-feet would gross $5,380,451,712. If Nestlé nets one-fifth of what that water sells for, it would make over $1 billion a year.
>>>
Arul Francis
Clayton, California
Jun 04, 2007 12:00 AM
3
One of the wisest articles I've read in Outlook. Takes a vital problem which no Outlook writer has really looked at (pardon me if I have missed any), takes a holistic view of the problem, and is full of insights and pointers to action. Kudos to the writer.
Narasimhan M.G
Hyderabad, India
Jun 03, 2007 12:00 AM
2
You should be writing soon on birth control since we need to ration water soon, in a big way. India's population is at least twice bigger than the water and other resources can support=hence, we should be talking of one-child or two-child policies-implemented with iron will.

Why aren't the Jihadi Congress and other Muslim parties not talking of water rationing? Reducing the ABSOLUTE size of extremely over populated India?

Please do research on birth control methodologies and to implement them as the election manifesto
Muhammed
Deerfielf, United States
Jun 02, 2007 12:00 AM
1
Why are the Hindu tax payers subsidizing their killers?

HYDERABAD: In all, 1.10 lakh Haj pilgrims from all over the country will receive the Centre's Rs. 500-crore subsidy this year.

The Saudi Arabian Government has given permission to one lakh people to visit the country for the Haj and negotiations are on to allow the remaining 10,000 Hajis. State's quota for the pilgrimage has been fixed at 7,100.

Andhra Pradesh Minorities Welfare Minister Mohd. Ali Shabbir said here on Friday that 45,000 others would be going on the Haj through private travel agencies outside the purview of the subsidy.

The Minister said that no lots would be drawn if the applications received were less in number compared to the State quota and applicants, depending on fulfilling other conditions, would be selected straightaway.

No lots for aged


As a special concession, pilgrims aged above 75 years would be selected without drawing of lots. However, those who had undertaken the pilgrimage in the last five years would not be eligible now.

Mr. Shabbir said those wanting to undertake pilgrimage could apply before June 30.

Applications could be obtained from district Collectors/Haj societies or could be downloaded from www.haj committee.com. Draw of lots, if necessary, would be conducted between July 1 and 10. For more details contact 040-23298793.












--------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
Muhammed
Deerfielf, United States
COLLAPSE COMMENTS   
Post a Comment
You are not logged in, please log in or register
ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISING RATES | COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER | COMMENTS POLICY