100 yrs of satyagraha
Gandhi, A Second Coming
A 100 years after he conceived the satyagraha, a breed of neo-Gandhians goes beyond the khadi and charkha to coopt Bapu in whole new ways.
new gandhians
A hi-tech generation rediscovers Gandhi—not as Mahatma or a picture on sarkari walls—but as a role model for our times
gandhi memorabilia
Gandhi goes glitzy for Gen Y, and the signs are everywhere
"He was vital, witty, caring, inconvenient, a touchstone of a man. One thing he was not: a bore." Gopal Gandhi, Author, Gandhi's grandson

"Gandhi was deified, buried in institutions. An irony, given how uneasy he was with institutions." Mushirul Hasan, Historian

"Khadi, charkha are outdated. We now need to climb on Gandhi's shoulders and look ahead." S.K. Dwivedi, Rashtriya Yuva Sangathan

"The youth may not appreciate a dhoti-clad Gandhi. (Till you) say he was a rich barrister who sacrificed all." A. Annamalai, Gandhi Study Circle

***

"The art of living and dying" is how Mohandas Gandhi described his unique tool of resistance, perhaps India's greatest contribution to modern times. But he couldn't find a name for it until he held a contest. The word thrown up was: satyagraha. A hundred years later, a new breed of Gandhians—who have shed the old, faded icon of the Mahatma along with the khadi and the jholas to attract a new, hi-tech generation—is reinventing Gandhian vocabulary by renaming it "9/11". This, in memory of the day when an impassioned young barrister with blazing eyes gathered 3,000 Indians in the Empire Theatre building in Johannesburg on September 11, 1906, and asked them to take an oath to resist their white colonial oppressors without striking a single blow.

Satyagraha 1913: Gandhi adopts the dress of Tamil indentured labour during his satyagraha in Durban, SA


Oddly, while the government has yet to wake up to the significance of this event—apart from setting up one of those inevitable committees that has yet to meet—Gandhian youth organisations that have sprung up recently across the country are wresting the initiative away from the usual custodians of the Mahatma in a bid to reach the young. Plans are on to launch their year-long centenary celebrations in fresh, new ways that tie contemporary issues to the reawakened interest in a man who has so far been interred in textbooks and in marigold-engulfed statues. The new-age satyagrahis—a word that they wish to avoid like the politicians in Gandhi topis—will go on peace runs, bicycle yatras for communal harmony, motorbike rallies for Indo-Pak peace and against female foeticide; take Gandhi films and discussion groups to professional colleges, radio programmes and wall newspapers to slums and villages; hold comicbook workshops and roundtable discussions with leaders of all political hues, including advocates of terrorism, "because everyone deserves to be heard".

And it's not just in India. A youthful surge of enthusiasm for Gandhian ideals across the globe is taking aback scholars and teachers who had grown resigned to thinking of him as a "back number". When, for instance, University of Chicago professor and co-author of Postmodern Gandhi, Lloyd Rudolph, started an optional course on Gandhi a few years ago, he expected less than a dozen students to sign up. Instead, over 75 students, a quarter of them of Indian origin, applied.

 
 
'Satyagrahis' will go on peace runs, mobike rallies for Indo-Pak harmony, communal peace, women's rights...
 
 
Many had to be turned away. "These are young people mostly from the science or technical streams, agnostic, not driven by dogma or religion, but by norms," Lloyd explains. "They are looking for a course that adds meaning in their life, an answer to that eternal question: what shall I do with my life?" And, suddenly, it's the Mahatma that fits the bill.

Agrees A. Annamalai of Chennai's Gandhi Study Circle, one of the over 150 Gandhian youth organisations in India. "Young people may not be able to relate to a dhoti-clad Gandhi with his charkha," he says. "But tell them how he was a millionaire London-returned barrister (Gandhi's earnings as a barrister were around 5,000 pounds a year in an era when one pound fetched seven grams of gold) who threw away everything to fight for justice and equality, and they begin at once to appreciate him." As a result, says the 40-year-old Gandhian in shirt and trousers who, unlike the old school of Gandhians, laughs a lot: "We've been able to recruit Gandhi enthusiasts from technical and engineering backgrounds, besides software professionals, as volunteers who contribute in many areas such as village industries, eco-friendly products, sensitising policemen and bureaucrats, and helping popularise Gandhi in schools and colleges in ways they can relate to."


Satyagraha 2006: Aruna Roy, Sandeep Dwivedi et al protest dilution of RTI Act

A national survey earlier this month by The Hindu-CNN-IBN bears this out.

 
 
A survey of Indians below 30 in 19 states this month showed 76% rate Gandhi as their top role model.
 
 
The survey of Indians below 30 in 19 states showed that nearly 76 per cent rate Gandhi as their top role model. No one is more surprised by this than a generation that has seen Gandhi "enshrined or vandalised", as his grandson and author Gopalkrishna Gandhi puts it. "Gandhi was ill-served by everyone, including the Gandhians," agrees historian Mushirul Hasan. "They deified him and buried him in institutions, which is ironical, considering how uncomfortable Gandhi was with institutions. He was conveniently portrayed as a saint so that they wouldn't be threatened by his ideology."

But the worst disservice done to Gandhi, according to Gopal Gandhi, is how "a vital, witty, disturbing, admonitory, inconvenient, caring, touchstone of a man" was turned into the "one thing he was not: a bore".

Even someone who came to Gandhi through the Marxist route like Aruna Roy is dismayed at how "a very modern, rational, interesting man with a fantastic sense of humour like Gandhi was turned into a fuddy-duddy crashing bore. By turning him into the Father of the Nation, we could ignore him apart from putting up ugly statues at every crossing and garlanding him on October 2". Whereas, Roy points out, "anyone who reads him can't help but engage with him". For activists, Roy says, Gandhi is "irrevocably and absolutely relevant, especially in these three areas: bringing ethical responsibility into public life—no public figure anywhere in the world has examined himself so thoroughly in full public view; bringing a moral position into the economic debate; and his position against communalism, about the equality of all religions".


The maulvi and the mahant at Tulsighat in Benares In these communally-tense times, Gandhi still holds relevance

It is this conviction about Gandhi's potential to engage a new generation that's driving attempts to repackage Bapu as their man for the 21st century. "We have to reach out to the young," says Santosh Kumar Dwivedi, national secretary of the Rashtriya Yuva Sangathan (RYS), a Gandhian youth organisation set up 12 years ago. "If we want to set up a non-violent society, what other option is there before us?" But youth, as Dwivedi is the first to admit, aren't exactly enamoured with the fusty, faddist lot of old Gandhians.

It is these so-called Gandhians who killed his spirit, says Leeladhar Manik Gada, a former timber merchant who now employs youth to work for social change in the Kutch area of Gujarat. "They want young people to follow Gandhi with closed eyes. These Gandhians haven't come out of their compounds and seen the world, nor have they made any attempt to understand today's problems. They demand that the young follow Gandhi like they do."

Leeladhar, who says he's proud to call himself a Gandhian, belongs among the new Gandhians, although he's 68. "There are plenty of young people who want to contribute to society. Many of them are graduates of rural studies without a job. Their work is worth much more than we can ever pay them. But if you ask them to wear khadi and discard technology, they won't want to do this kind of work. What does it matter if a young man wears pants-shirt, uses a motorbike rather than walk, so long as he gets the work done?" Agrees Dwivedi, "There is youth power that can be tapped out there, and we weren't doing it," pointing out that's why the RYS has discarded the old Gandhian symbols. Of course, there was resistance from the older lot but, as Dwivedi says, "Khadi and charkha are outdated symbols. We need to now climb on Gandhi's shoulders and look ahead".

The new approach worked: the new Gandhian youth movement has now spread across 10 states, with young volunteers involved in issues like promoting communal harmony, agitating for the land rights of dispossessed tribals in Madhya Pradesh and Orissa, and holding camps and workshops for college students and young professionals like themselves.


Little Gandhis: Schoolchildren dressed the part on October 2

It's youth in the cities that is the focus of people like Dwivedi "In the villages people haven't forgotten their Gandhi Baba," says the 36-year-old who works in Madhya Pradesh's Umariya district, organising tribals to fight for their land rights through Gandhi's methods. But the hardest part, agrees this new breed of Gandhians, is not so much seducing the young into reading Gandhi as disabusing them of the misconceptions that have spread unhindered in the last 50 years. Each of the open sessions in the summer camps that are now a yearly feature in many cities across India throws up the same questions: Gandhi versus Ambedkar, Gandhi versus Bhagat Singh and Gandhi versus the women in his life. It takes a Gandhian of a special kind to respond to this, according to Dwivedi. "The leader at these workshops has to be open-minded enough for these candid discussions, which often get very heated, and at the same time, has to be well-read enough to be able to counter these misconceptions." At the last summer camp that Dwivedi led in Gandhi's Sevagram ashram last year, for example, over 550 college students turned up, curious to experience the alternative lifestyle the ashram offers to its young residents. "We had to turn away many because we did not have enough qualified teachers to conduct this kind of workshop."

But it's well worth the effort, says Dwivedi, pointing out that the RYS has probably recruited more young volunteers in 12 years than most Gandhian organisations have been able to do over six decades. It's not hard to understand why. To many, aware that globalisation is "the kiss of death" for many of their ideals, and in search of a way to be socially effective, the package they're offering seems an irresistible one: a choice of alternative lifestyles, a chance to contribute to society, a challenging learning experience and, more important, no rigid ideology. "We just let everyone coopt Gandhi in their own way," as an RYS founder, Kumar Prashant, says.

All agree, however, that the efforts to woo the young for the Gandhian cause are still too small and splintered. "A faint voice," as one young Gandhian activist, Prerna Desai, puts it, "but distinctly beginning to be heard." Swiss reporter Bernard Imhasly affirms this. Last year, he followed in the footsteps of the Mahatma, searching for his spirit in the usual places. What he saw there changed his mind. The book was to be called Goodbye to Gandhi—Travels Through India. He ended up putting a question mark after Gandhi. "It (Gandhi's spirit) is there, but you don't see it, because India is so obsessed with making it in the world that nothing else is evident."


new gandhians
A hi-tech generation rediscovers Gandhi—not as Mahatma or a picture on sarkari walls—but as a role model for our times
gandhi memorabilia
Gandhi goes glitzy for Gen Y, and the signs are everywhere
 
Daily MailPublished
COLLAPSE COMMENTS :
HAVE YOUR SAY
Sep 23, 2006 12:00 AM
23
If nothing else than Gandhi-ji´s views on food and diet are relevant to our times of mass-obesity. A modern nuitritionist such as Dr Fuhrman/NY in his Eat To Live diet and Fasting For Health, is pretty close to Bapu´s thoughts :)

Gul Ramani
Duesseldorf, Germany
Sep 17, 2006 12:00 AM
22
Most of my posts, similar to Pope's, were deleted and hence I had to assume other names.
Outlook must explain why posts under Bharath, Rumtek and Maitreya were deleted while according prime spot to the Pope-with a problematic statement, coming from a major Religious Head-though true, 110%
Ananda
Saint Vincent, Saint Vincent and The Grenadines
Sep 17, 2006 12:00 AM
21
"He only propagated a new thinking about life and being in peace with one self. Vedic teachings form the foundation of culture of Bharath and fools see this as brahmin-domination"

When asked who He was-Buddha simply said he was "AWARE". This awakening culture and the Path, as Buddha said, was not new to India -but he rediscovered it since it was forgotten. The sages of India could not make it a mass movement since educated were few-with the Upanishads restricted to onlt oral transmission, lest they be heard by the Dalits and other lower castes, restricted to Brahmins and the rulers.

It's true that Vedas-Upanishads were compiled by both Brahmins and non-brahmins. In fact, the Upanisdadic article on transmigration of souls (questined by the Buddha, both on its logic and usefulness, successfully)was authoured by a Kshatriya.

Vivekananda summed up well when he said that the Buddha imparted Wisdom and Compassion into Hinduism!
Ananda
Saint Vincent, Saint Vincent and The Grenadines
Sep 16, 2006 12:00 AM
20
India needed a Gill-Patel-Kalam Combo (closer to a Mao) to siurvive from the ever-enveloping terrorist Islam. Is it too late?

Would Gandhiji would ever be remembered in a Moslem India? What would happen to the Ashoka Flag, our Constiution-what's left of the Hindu-Buddhist heritage-in a Moslem India? Since Hindus are CONFIRMED INFIDELS and IDLOLATORS, will India's history start from the 7-10th century-officially, in a soon to be the Moslem India?
Ananda
Saint Vincent, Saint Vincent and The Grenadines
Sep 16, 2006 12:00 AM
19
Although comparing Gandhiji to Buddha is rather unfair (to Buddha, of course)-Gandhiji was the second (distant second, though)greatest Indian perhaps ever lived. Buddha like the Sun and Gandhiji like the Moon.

One thing, among many, that I greatly admired in Gandhiji was his trait of treating others bigger than they actually were! This was how Nehruji, Patelji, Azadji and others came out of obscurity and shone like superstars. Gandhiji never felt threatended by these mostly England-educated and scotch drinking intellectuals.In fact, he understood their need for growing up! He provided adequate nourishment.
Ananda
Saint Vincent, Saint Vincent and The Grenadines
Sep 14, 2006 12:00 AM
18
Those who criticize Gandhi should understand that he was a visionary and went beyond narrow caste and religious preferences. Born in an effluent forward caste family and having the best of the education with a great potential for earning, he sacrificed all to motivate the common man to fight for his rights. He lived true to the teachings of Gita, which is the essence of all the upanishads. For those who feel Buddhism is superior to any othr religion, let me tell you that Siddharha Gauthama (remember that he was born a Hindu, prince... upper caste... etc)didnot start a new religion. He only propagated a new thinking about life and being in peace with one self. Vedic teachings form the foundation of culture of Bharath and fools see this as brahmin-domination. If you truly believe all men are made equal, why do you even think that somebody is dominating, stand up and fight.
Ram
Vancouver, Canada
Sep 14, 2006 12:00 AM
17
Dear Bharath,

I am not comparing Gandhi to Gautam Buddha, and was only interested in comparing what Gandhi did for dalits to what Ambedkar did. I know Buddhism is a great philosophy, but the article on which I am commenting is about Gandhi and not about Buddha or Buddhism. I can see the passion you have for buddhism, and I appreciate it. But this is hardly the forum for promotion of a particular religion.

Also, I must say that while you have a right to favor one religion over others, please don't condemn islam and hinduism for all the troubles of the world. Stop blaming other people and other religions for your problems, man. If you follow Buddha, then look inwards and grow from there, rather than looking outwards and finding faults with others. Isn't that the rational way of thinking that Buddha taught to the world?
kunal
denver, usa
Sep 13, 2006 12:00 AM
16
It is wrong to label Gandhi as a "conservative" as Sundari does. And I think Bharath's judgement that Ambedkar did more for dalits by converting to buddhism is faulty as well.

Gandhi was a liberal, infact an ultra-liberal. How can a conservative man do so much for rights of poor individuals, favor religious harmony, womens' rights, and work so hard to remove untouchability from society? Are these the traits of a conservative? I don't know what motivates Sundari to say that he was a conservative...maybe she is just focusing on a single aspect of his personality and ideology.

As for Bharath's judgement, let me say this: If converting to buddhism or any religion for that matter is supposed to take all pains of dalits away, then they could have converted 2500 years ago! Will a landlord stop exploiting a peasant now that he has converted to buddhism? What Ambedkar did is certainly noteworthy, but conversion and reservations don't change much, otherwise casteism would have vanished in these 59 years (instead, caste-awareness is on high these days...thanks to Arjun Singh!). Think about this: in India, even christians and muslims have castes, while castes don't figure in basic christianity and Islam. The caste system is more of a cultural phenomenon than a religious one. To remove this, a concentrated effort is required through policy(make caste irrelevent for jobs and education, make any caste-based bias a punishable offense, invest in primary education and economic uplifting or poorest of poor irrespective of caste), and education(teach about the ills of caste system in schools).

It is easy to misunderstand Gandhi because most people look at him through different lenses, based on their own socio-economic situation. For example: Hindus who migrated from Pakistan blame him for partition and their sufferings, Many dalits dislike him because he was not in favor of reservations and did not enjoy a great rapport with Ambedkar. Infact some of my gujarati friends blame him for Gujarat being a 'dry' state:-)

If you look at Gandhi in totality, and judge him by his actions and intent, instead of all the results of his actions(not all results can be great, can they?), you will find him an extraordinarily intellignet, practical and compassionate person, not the conservative or anti-dalit as some people would like you to believe.
kunal
denver, usa
Sep 09, 2006 12:00 AM
15
International Gandhi Peace Prize goes to Shabana Azmi.


http://tinyurl.com/n48ea
Ghulam Y Faruki
New York, United States
Sep 09, 2006 12:00 AM
14
Gandhi had great and influential ideas about grassroots political mobilization.

But in the end he was basically conservative and his martyr act was annoying and fake - a deep form of passive aggression. His Pune pact fast was unforgivable. He basically traded the rights of Dalits for those of secessionist Muslims - a strange dynamic that continues with secular parties frequently being manically anti-Dalit.
Sundari
Chennai, India
Sep 07, 2006 12:00 AM
13
gandhi was not a failure in any sense.the fact that his ideals are looked upon with respect even in this day and age shows that the man thought way ahead of his times and was above pety politics and social disputes. what has actually failed is our nations ability to imbibe in his teachings. gandhi , as time passed became a mere symbol of our past, an easy icon who could be blamed for all our failures and inefficiencies. time has come to re invent gandhi in the modern context, and i am sure the new generation shall do the needful
ameetbhuvan
bhubaneswar, India
Sep 05, 2006 12:00 AM
12
I have all praise for Gandhi for his non-violance means. I also have no doubt on his sincerity for uplifting Dalits, who he called Harijans. But it ends here. He succesfully raised the issue of untouchability but neither he or Congress was able to achieve anything positive. Worse, they put all possible hindrance on Ambedkar's effort. Congress, Gandhi's or later, was designed so that it remains in high caste's control, with some Harijan face like Jagjeevan Ram. But today Dalits look up to Kansi Ram and Mayawati. Ambedkar won and Gandhi lost.
Rajesh
Phoenix, United States
Sep 04, 2006 12:00 AM
11
Natwar says, "Neither the US nor the EU have any worthwhile ideas for dealing with or any understanding of Islam."

Seems he is on to something.
Ghulam Y Faruki
New York, United States
Sep 04, 2006 12:00 AM
10
Gandhians! Take heart! Good news is on the way! I just found out from Natwar Singh(in asian age) that he had arranged for Castro to see the Gandhi film and he said later "We knew almost nothing about him and the moral grandeur of his life and the message of active nonviolence. The impression created on our minds will last a long time."

That explains the mystery of why the arrests and torture in Cuba came down from the tens of thousands to mere thousands in the eighties and nineties. Gandhi had influenced Castro!! So Gandhians have nothing to worry. The perennial brother Fidel is there to perpetuate the message of Gandhi for all time to come.

And Natwar waxes eloquence about NAM. Its a state of mind!!!!!!!!!! And he has hope only in Hu Jintao and Putin-great promoters of democracy and great promoters of peace in the world.

And this made the icing on the cake.

"Neither the US nor the EU have any worthwhile ideas for dealing with or any understanding of Islam."

The only one who seems to have any idea on Islam is Natwar. And ofcourse his heroes Gandhi and Nehru. We know what their "understanding" achieved.
Ganesan
Nj, USA
Sep 04, 2006 12:00 AM
9
Useful idiots!!!

http://www.iranian.ws/i...ish/article_17095.shtml

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,1072-1716156,00.html
Sriram
Chennai, India
Sep 03, 2006 12:00 AM
8
rumtek has put things in right perspective. but stating that only violence will work with mozzies is carrying things too far. after all sufi's were a product of islam. they are also humans with same instinct. the only change vis-a-vis mozzie nations should be a enhanced level of alertness and caution.
nits
nashville, USA
Sep 03, 2006 12:00 AM
7
The day we stopped followings the great principles, valour and ideals of historical figures like Lord Ram, Lord Krishna and followed this nut case called Gandhi, India's was cursed. We have all seen the fruits of Gandhi's ideals. India is in a mess today. He got carried away by the praises from gullible masses and lead India towards destruction. Neither we eliminated poverty nor we secured ourselves through non-violence. India should get back to the where it belong before this nut case appeared on the scene i.e follow our true heroes Ram and Krishna.

True Indian
,,, United States
Sep 03, 2006 12:00 AM
6
I dont believe Gandhism has significance now nor it had even during his life time. And I dont believe in the article's premise that Gandhism is making a comeback.

But assuming its true, it shows yet again the great harm done by Godse. Gandhi was almost a nonentity after independence. His popularity had hit rock bottom. Even his ardent supporters were disappointed with his abject failure-in virtually everything. There was not one positive accomplishment to his name and no one listened to him anymore-a fact acknoledged by Gandhi himself. He lamented that no one is listening to him anymore. Had he died a natural death, he would have been buried along with the other political failures and that would have been the end.

Godse resurrected the sagging career of Gandhi. Suddenly he became a martyr, a saint, a man of who is beyond criticism and Gandhism became a panacea for all problems. His nonsensical ideas, which would have normally withered out, got a new life with his death. Godse committed to atrocities-murdering a man, giving life to his ideals. He should have been hanged twice.
Ganesan
Nj, USA
Sep 03, 2006 12:00 AM
5
Abhimanyu, I was just repeating what she said.
Ghulam Y Faruki
New York, United States
Sep 03, 2006 12:00 AM
4
>> "If my memory serves me right, didn't one Muslim member some weeks back on this very forum call Gandhi a 'terrorist'?"

She later said that she was not a Muslim.
Ghulam Y Faruki
New York, United States
Sep 03, 2006 12:00 AM
3
The levels of anger, hatred and suspicion that have infused our recent public discourse cry out for the second coming of a towering figure with the message of love and morality. There can be no better counterpoint to Osama than Gandhi.
Ghulam Y Faruki
New York, United States
Sep 02, 2006 12:00 AM
2
Gandhi was the greatest of all successes. Thanks to him India is being overrun by a Muslim population, much of which would have left for Pakistan in 1947, having voted for Jinnah.

Gandhi is the Perfect Hindu - from Osama's viewpoint. He will bless a jihadist in his whining vegetarian voice even as the latter is cutting the throat of a Hindu child.
Anil Narlikar
Pune, India
Sep 02, 2006 12:00 AM
1
"hold comicbook workshops and roundtable discussions with leaders of all political hues, including advocates of terrorism, "because everyone deserves to be heard".

Speaking with advocates of terrorism! A perfectly Gandhian approach. Gandhi wanted the Brits to surrender to Hitler and win his heart and mind. "Do not fight those who are invading your country" has evolved into "do not fight those who are trying to blow you up". This is Gandhism for the 21st century. No doubt the Gandhians have "evolved".

"no public figure anywhere in the world has examined himself so thoroughly in full public view; bringing a moral position into the economic debate; and his position against communalism, about the equality of all religions"

He examined himself in public view and the public never examined him at all!! If they had done so, he would have been dumped. No one else has such a string of political failures as Gandhi(Nehru being a close second). Right from the Khilafat movement down to his insistence on giving PAK money while giving a damn about the hindus there, he had one policy failure after another. In that respect Gandhism is unique. The more it failed, the more popular it became.

I dont know about the "moral" position in economics. Safe to assume it must be some socialistic drivel against capitalism. I will let that pass. As far the "equality of religions" , it is his original contribution and a perfect nonsense. He insisted thats what hinduism says when it doesnt. It accepts that people have different temperaments and so every one will follow his path at his pace. But does is not a stamp of approval for everything. Hinduism is very open in calling false faiths as false. Gandhi made this openness a taboo.

And less talked about his "success" in promoting communal harmony, the better.
Ganesan
Nj, USA
COLLAPSE COMMENTS   
Post a Comment
You are not logged in, please log in or register
ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISING RATES | COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER | COMMENTS POLICY