Sandeep Adhwaryu
opinion
Coup De KANK
'Hello and welcome, I am Karan Johar and this is the news at 9'
Right now, it doesn't matter if you don't have an opinion on Israel's bombardment of Lebanon or whether you believe in Dr Manmohan Singh as prime minister. You have to know where you stand on Karan Johar's cotton-candy take on infidelity, Kabhi Alvida Na Kehna. The subject isn't new even in Hindi cinema: off the top of my head, I can name Guide, Silsila, Masoom, Yeh Nazdeekiyan, Arth, Griha Pravesh, Aastha, Ek Hi Bhool, even Paheli....

And yet, the media began to behave as if the film had actually investigated marriage as a serious text instead of a way of showing pretty people doing petty things against a backdrop of extreme privilege.
 
 
TV channels are tying up with films. Soon, editorial control will be offered up for access to stars.
 
 
For that is what Karan Johar's cinema is about but you'd think he was actually making something important and meaningful. So meaningful that NDTV literally couldn't stop talking about it.

But then, this is the way it is going to be from now on. Watch Barkha Dutt talking about remakes on We the People, when the remade Don (Shahrukh-Priyanka-Kareena) comes out. For you see, NDTV has managed to tie up with Farhan Akhtar for that one and he might just give them a little spot in which some extra holds up a mike saying NDTV. Industry sources say that CNN-IBN has tied up with Jaan-e-mann (Salman-Akshay-Preity), so we will have Rajdeep Sardesai on love triangles, perhaps? No one knows which way J.P. Dutta will jump when his version of Umrao Jaan (at Kargil, perhaps?) is released but someone will snap up this one since it has Aishwarya, Abhishek and Sunil Shetty and then we'll have indepth interviews with the designer of the costume and the zari workers who slogged for hours....

They tie up. Nothing wrong with that, is there?

Well, not really, not unless we're worried about the nature of journalism, even film journalism, which Khalid Mohammed once described to me as being tantamount to having "third class citizenship in the nation of the media". It is not unusual for a television channel to commit to a thousand spots, some of which are promos, but some of which are also editorial. So while everyone goes around saying that the Times of India pioneered the sellout of journalism to the interests of the bottomline, watch while the television channels offer up their editorial control for access to the stars.

"You see," says a straight-talking critic from one channel, "the industry is savvy now. They take along another crew to shoot the crew so that they have material for those 'Making ofs'. Those are huge. A channel can play them and look like they were there and if you think viewers are going to feel a bit of deja vu, they add a little of their own masala, a few interviews with the editor or the cameraman to make it look different. Or they give you access to the set and let you shoot some stuff with them. That kind of thing."

But KANK was the textbook case. It generated hype on its own because it was a Karan Johar film and there is something so unbearably glossy that all the little girls will go and spend the commute home asking each other who would stray if she were married to Shahrukh/Abhishek (depending on whether the little girl in question likes her men camp or clumsy). But the media was on the same bus. You couldn't turn around without a journalist of stature having a magisterial say about the problem of marital infidelity, the unbearable lightness of cotton-candy cinema and other such earth-shattering topics.

At this year's Osian Cinefan, the French were preening themselves on how they treated cinema as a cultural event and how a new film would sometimes be given three pages in Le Monde. Then Hubert Niogret, also French, pointed out that while the paper would give a film three pages, they would give it this kind of saturation coverage even if their critic thought it a bad film.

That's what we've done here. We've taken our star worship to its natural conclusion. In our desperate desire to know anything about them, everything about them, we've allowed our media to turn into panders for the producers. The next time we watch a saccharine Simi or a cosy Karan, we should know what we've done. We've thrown out the baby and now we've got into the bubble bath. Bring on the froth....




(Jerry Pinto is the author of Helen: The Life and Times of an H-Bomb.)
 
Daily MailPublished
COLLAPSE COMMENTS :
HAVE YOUR SAY
Sep 09, 2006 12:00 AM
8
Was this meant to be a critique on the rapidly disappearing line between news and entertainment - or a cover-up for a movie review? Because if it was meant to be the former, surely Mr. Pinto could have done better than "hopping on the train" himself.
Good, bad or ugly, KANK touched a chord among people and evoked public debate - one speaks from personal observation. Sure, it made sense for a news channel to use the opportunity for a discussion - and why ever not? In criticising the show, Mr. Pinto belittles the many people who were brave enough to come on national TV with their personal ordeals. Not to mention the many adults( rather than just "little girls") who saw the film and could look beyond the "unbearable gloss" to relate to many of the situations portrayed. Different strokes for different folks, Mr. Pinto! Next time you dislike a film, stick to writing a negative review - please don't use your personal opinion as a "hook" for a supposedly critical essay.
Poonam
Delhi, India
Sep 08, 2006 12:00 AM
7
Thank god, there is at least someone who has not jumped onto the bandwagon. Thanks, Jerry, for being bold enough (in the media, I mean) that Karan Johar's films are crap.
Ramana
Hyderabad, India
Sep 07, 2006 12:00 AM
6
it was indeed very sad to see NDTV giving prime air time coverage to a movie like KANK! they should have learnt something from outlook and Mr.Mehta. just look how nicely he publicises Lage Raho Munna Bhai through a half baked , shoddily researched and eloquently flimsy piece on gandhi's return and his reinvention by the gen Y without even once mentioning the movie. now thats how the responsible media should mix business with journalistic fervour . three cheers to outlook! what say jerry pinto?
ameetbhuvan
bhubaneswar, India
Sep 06, 2006 12:00 AM
5
All that publicity sure did create a BUzz about the movie.But when i finally watched the movie I was diappointed.Theme was good but horrible execution on the script front.Karan watch rang De basanti and learn something!!
rahul
cal, India
Sep 04, 2006 12:00 AM
4
BTW, Jerry, if you read any of this, I quoted from one of your earlier pieces in an article about changes in Bwood in the summer issue of American film quarterly Cineaste (
http://cineaste.com/home.htm)
Thanks for writing those great myth buster pieces.
Asd
Asd, Azerbaijan
Sep 04, 2006 12:00 AM
3
Jerry Pinto is my favorite writer on films. KANK was like the Emperor's Clothes - (most) everyone oohing and aahing, but at the end of the day it's a 4 hour long screamfest. Thanks for pointing out the emperor's threadbare outfit, Jerry
Asd
Asd, Azerbaijan
Sep 02, 2006 12:00 AM
2
t was definitely amusing seeing the kind of publicity that NDTV gave to KANK.

There were ads about the "behind the scene actions", then there were "behind the scene episodes", then when the film released, we had reporters standing outside theatres declaring it a super-hit.

And if this was not enough, we had Barkha Dutt with her "We, The People" and Vir Sanghvi with his "Face the Music". The only thing left now seems to be "Walk the Talk" with Shekhar Gupta (that would complete the Trilogy).

Just because Karan Johar made a film about infidelity (and like the writer of this article rightfully pointed out - its not the first one : though he forgot "Saahib, Biwi Aur Ghulam") and because Shah Rukh Khan acted in it, Barkha Dutt treated them like experts in human relationships and marital affairs.

God only save us, if KJ & SRK get together for a movie about doctors & surgery - BD would put them up in 'We The People' and ask their views and advice on advanced surgery.
Chanakya
Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Sep 02, 2006 12:00 AM
1
It is pathetic to see Barkha using all means to promote a senseless film.Her credibility has taken a beating. Even HTs reviews seemed dictated. Nowadays people are not fools. Public Sab Janti Hai.
pear
mumbai, India
COLLAPSE COMMENTS   
Post a Comment
You are not logged in, please log in or register
ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISING RATES | COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER | COMMENTS POLICY