It was no secret that spinners would matter in the match, perhaps in the series. India perceives South Africa to be vulnerable in this area and would now be further emboldened. But there is also the danger they could overplay the card.
South Africa is not as bad against slow bowlers though different conditions tend to complicate matters of footwork. The pitches in the two countries bear little resemblance in pace or bounce. We would see if the remaining week of the series is enough to come to terms with these conditions.
Ironically, it was not the spinners who precipitated the crisis. It was Irfan Pathan. South Africa would like to hold him up as the culprit.
I am very impressed how quickly he assesses the conditions and opponents. There is a sense of plan in his methods.
I have noticed pacemen in these conditions tend to bowl straighter and slower around the seam. If you have the control and shape the red cherry well, you are on your way. He did it with Graeme Smith and later another fine example of it was served by Shaun Pollock.
In the sub-continent, pulling back your pace could be decisive.
So spinners actually did not wreak the damage; they merely picked up the spoils. In one-dayers, it is very difficult to come back if you lose early wickets.
India made a good start and built on the advantage as the innings wore on. South Africa could not have risked too much and it made the spinners' job easy. I wonder if it would still have been the same if South Africa were 50 for no loss.
There is no mistaking the merits of Smith's men. It has many match-winners with depth in batting and bowling. Justin Kemp's name is quick to recall though Jacques Kallis could as effortlessly shift gears and is an excellent finisher of a game.
It still would have served this team greatly had Jonty Rhodes been around. Besides his other values, he was an exciting player of spin. Somebody needs to put up his hand and cast himself in Jonty's mould.
I have been told Indians are backing themselves to snare Smith in the spin trap. Much of this is evident in the manner he bats and the way he throws his bat at the ball. But Smith has a fantastic record and is still improving.
For all the spotlight on him, he is still only 23. He will start to get better and his range would expand.
As it is, he is very good in giving the team a good and quick start and his 50s and 60s are often the platform for others to hit their 100s. In this heady year when South Africa has won everything and lost only an odd game or two, Smith has been the key. Over 800 runs at 48-plus point to his influence.
Hopefully on a tour such as this, Smith would learn to play quality spinners better. He has got to put together a plan to come good on slower wickets.
I have noticed that batsmen coming from South Africa to slower wickets tend to fall over in their strokes. The key is to keep their balance and wait for their shots longer.
There was a contest within this match-up which I had looked forward to and it did not take place. Pollock and Makhaya Ntini operating against Virender Sehwag and Sachin Tendulkar could be a classic duel. Both pairs work well in tandem and have been enormously successful with their methods in one-day cricket. South Africa have not seen the best of Tendulkar and they hope it stays that way!
The South African pace attack is not to be trifled with. Pollock and Ntini have a pool of experience which they have shared with Andre Nel. They know the importance of line and length and variations in this part of the world. It is hostility by other means.
It is also evident the Indians have improved as a fielding unit. Come to think of it, all teams in international cricket have made strides in the field. It is now accorded an importance similar to batting and bowling.
The Indians have also drawn notice on a few of their youngsters but such is the length and breadth of the country and the uncommon passion for the game that a few exciting talents are always waiting in the block.
It appears to me an evenly matched series between two units who would not like to retard the progress of recent months. Both have a number of
The challenge is greater for South Africa because of alien conditions but India cannot drop their guard for a moment.
The strife for booty has begun in earnest.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT