AP
Opinion
Devil Sings The Hymns
The slogan has no scriptural sanction, but religious and secular connotations
intolerance
Religious symbols turn handy tools in obscurantist agenda. Jo bole, he's gone. Updates
Sheela Reddy
interview
SGPC President on why she finds the film Jo Bole So Nihaal objectionable.
Chander Suta Dogra
Opinion
It was a bad film, period. Why did it have to become a threat to the collective Sikh soul?
Madan Gopal Singh
Designer ware abroad which appropriated Indian icons and attracted Hindu wrath for it
The slogan Jo bole so nihal, Sat Sri Akal (Blessed is the one who says God is truth) has both secular and religious connotations. At the end of a religious congregation, one person says, Jo bole so nihal, and the congregation replies: Sat Sri Akal. But there is no scriptural sanction for this, it is part of the maryada, the tradition, born much after the gurus.

As for the secular aspect, it was the war cry of the Sikhs when they went out to war against the armies of the Mughals and the Pathans.
 
 
'Jo bole...' was the sikh war cry just as hindus uttered 'har har mahadev' and muslims, 'allah-o-akbar'.
 
 
The Hindu equivalent would be Har Har Mahadev, the Muslim equivalent Allah-o-Akbar. This was a war cry the Sikhs used especially when they went on the offensive, what they called Jaikara.

The slogan is also used in both political and religious meetings as a form of applause, a sort of "Well done!" And just how freely the words are used can be illustrated by the fact that Sikhs use it as a toast before they start drinking, just as Muslims start with a Bismillah.

While there has been an increasing growth of intolerance among the Sikhs, they still don't bother to understand the words of the gurus. "Ikna sudh, na budh, na akal sar, akhar ka bheo na lahant/Nanak se nar asal khar, jo bin gun garab karant (Neither thinking nor understanding, they read words without meaning. Nanak says they are real donkeys, those who without doing any good are proud)."

It's a shame that a community that was so self-confident and could laugh at itself has become so bigoted, especially with the growth of a Taliban element among them. I've been slapped with a warning by the SGPC: they don't like me making jokes about Sardarjis. They threatened action against me if I didn't stop. What can they do—summon me to the Akal Takht and make me polish the shoes of worshippers? I just went ahead, using their letter in the introduction to my latest joke book. As one Sikh historian put it: "Sikhan ki jaatpaat hai danga, danga unhone guru seon manga (The Sikhs' creed is trouble; that's the blessing they asked from the Gurus.)"
intolerance
Religious symbols turn handy tools in obscurantist agenda. Jo bole, he's gone. Updates
Sheela Reddy
interview
SGPC President on why she finds the film Jo Bole So Nihaal objectionable.
Chander Suta Dogra
Opinion
It was a bad film, period. Why did it have to become a threat to the collective Sikh soul?
Madan Gopal Singh
Designer ware abroad which appropriated Indian icons and attracted Hindu wrath for it
 
Daily Mail
COLLAPSE COMMENTS :
HAVE YOUR SAY
Jun 04, 2005 12:00 AM
10
Completely agree with Parthasarthy > He should wear condoms on his tongue. Because thats where it belongs on his body.
Hari Rajesh
Bangalore, India
Jun 02, 2005 12:00 AM
9
gutsy article again by the clean old man of delhi.it seems intolerance and hypersensitivity is reaching epidemic proportions.how else would you describe the normally unflappable sikhs losing their cool over a slogan?the bug of religious extremism is cutting across all religious lines and the bigots are having a field day.another instance of this is the recent protest against 'sins' by christians.

i would have the pantheon of all our gods and godsses on condoms too.i mean they would serve some purpose instead of cooling their heels in places of worship!
sunil
mumbai, india
Jun 02, 2005 12:00 AM
8
Welcome to to virtual world - where media/journalists tells you - what is happening - what is correct et. al. And guess what - most dont even realize they have a social responsibility !

The title of the movie is completely inept. It is surprising that the director was so naive. Actually not, perhaps they wanted publicity.

Should we allow footwear with Godess images on them - in name of freedom ? Should we allow designer bikini wear with Hindu Gods and Goddess on them, Should we allow a beer by the name of - Ganesha Beer ? Should we allow them with the argument that - we are too great, our history is glorious and should ignore those. Definitely No.

If you think , these things are not being attempted wake up ! Every year in Canada/UK and many western countries these things happen - and we protest and often get justice. See www.indiacause.com.

As for the bomb blasts - some very educated people have already declared who/why of the guilty. It is increasingly becoming clear, that the theatres were chosen randomly as an act of mischief by the culprits - and had nothing to do with the movie.

As for very enlightened Khushwant Singh comment about drinks it is completely untrue. Even an idiot would not do that.

And yes - someone here wrote - left to themselves things will get worse - how true !

Hari Rajesh
Hari Rajesh
Bangalore, India
Jun 02, 2005 12:00 AM
7
In Khushwant Singh's story follwing sentence is not true for most of the Sikhs.
"how freely the words are used can be illustrated by the fact that Sikhs use it as a toast before they start drinking, just as Muslims start with a Bismillah"
The Jakara is used by the sikhs on when they take on a new venture but Mr. Singh is above statement is not in very good taste. I do agree with him on ""Ikna sudh, na budh, na akal sar, akhar ka bheo na lahant/Nanak se nar asal khar, jo bin gun garab karant"

Regards
Gurpreet S. Mann
USA
Gurpreet Mann
Takthtupura, India
Jun 01, 2005 12:00 AM
6
Uh Oh ... Outlooks Editor let one slip by ... a secular, sensible article, I mean ... without any political connotations ... without any Hindu bashing ... simple, straight-forward rational introspection about one's own community ... the stuff that opinion columns should be ... contrast this with the garbage spewed out by Yoginder & the other "Islamic liberals" touting "Islamic feminism" etc etc ...

Great going Srdarji ... tussi great ho ...
Dharmayudh Singh
Philadelphia, USA
Jun 01, 2005 12:00 AM
5
The gentleman who wrote in his comment that the "society's reaction" to this movie is justified as it will act as a forewarning...I don't know what motivated him to write this senseless comment. Does he mean that bombing cinema halls is justified because you don't like the movie's name?

We should realize that the reaction this gentleman is talking about was from a politico-religious group, and not from society at large. If these religious orgs. stop inciting people through their bigoted agenda, normal people are tolerant enough in our country.

I have no objection in people trying to stop something they don't like, afterall it's democracy. But you have to do it through legal means, not illegal bandhs and bomb blasts. If you find something objectionable in a movie, why not go to court? And if the courts reject your plea, why not sit back and understand that maybe you were wrong in your assessment? Why do you have to believe that whatever you found objectionable was actually bad and must be stopped?

The beauty of democracy lies in freedom of speech, and when there is a clash between your freedom and other's freedom, you should resort to the law of the land. That is the way to go. But alas, Indians have learnt to misuse Gandhi's civil disobedience tactic for negative purposes. This is hurting our country and democracy very severely.
kunal
denver, usa
May 31, 2005 12:00 AM
4
We are missing out a bigger issue in this controversy. The title slogan used in the movie might be a frivolous issues as seen by some self appointed intellectuals but then if the society does not take strong action when decay starts creeping in, it becomes too late when they wake up. Had this issue not created any furor the next movie would have shown something worse than this like a Sikh malhandling the Guru Granth Sahib or making mockery of Gurudwara, you never know what. Therefore this expostulation would be a fore warning for people like Rahul Rawail. We were silent accomplice to the vulgarity in Music Videos and see now what have we got. There are hardly any videos to watch with family these days. What Edi Murphy said "If left to themselves things will become worse" is very true.
Yugal Joshi
NewDelhi, India
May 31, 2005 12:00 AM
3
This is perhaps one of the best written pieces in Outlook in recent times. I must say that there are few brave people like Khushwant Singh who have the courage to accept a joke as a joke (and not make into a crisis in the religion or sect). The root cause of intolerance lies in our failure to understand the humour or foolishness in many of the events that have created controversy.
skdonweb
Bangalore, India
May 30, 2005 12:00 AM
2
good stuff from kushwant. we need more like him not only in the sikh community but also amongst hindu and muslims to counter the bigots who reside in all of these communities.
Surja Datta
Liverpool, UK
May 28, 2005 12:00 AM
1
It is a tragedy that religious leaders and politicians are ghettoing Sikhs in the name of protecting their religion. When a tyrant like Aurangzeb could not eliminate Sikhism, who can do harm to it in the mordern times when any injustice to any community or religion evokes worlwide condemnation and protest? If there is any danger to Sikhism m it is from the priests and religious leaders who are living off it by misintepretting it. It must be noted that the more Sikhs are becoming enlightened and outward looking , the more the priests are tightening their hold on them through teaching them bigotry . It is happening in every religion. May the tribe of people like Khushwant Singh incrase.
Sachdi Nanda
New Delhi., India
COLLAPSE COMMENTS   
Post a Comment
You are not logged in, please log in or register
ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISING RATES | COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER | COMMENTS POLICY