Digitally morphed by Jayachandran
congress
Mr Clean's New Spring?
Rahul's debut is a canny bid to offer an alternate point of focus from the polarising persona of Sonia Gandhi . Updates.
Self-absorbed and introvertish, Rahul's low-profile intelligence may calm a strife-torn Congress
congress/opinion
Why Rahul's case is qualitatively more subversive than, say, Chautala's
Dipankar Gupta
They make a pretty picture: the cherubic Rahul Gandhi leading his brigade of Ivy League-educated, MNC-trained youngsters into the heat and dust of the desi electoral battle. The babalog are back, in all their kurta-pyjama and sneaker-clad chic. But can they save the party? The Congress is in urgent need of a knight errant to rescue it from electoral embarrassment, fumbling as it is for a cogent agenda and a compelling slogan in contrast to the BJP's jackrabbit start.
 
 
"Rahul's arrival is a symbol of the greening of the Congress," says a fresher.
 
 
Poster-boy Rahul, it hopes, will brighten its campaign and give it an added edge.

However, no Congressman is willing to claim Rahul's electoral debut will miraculously turn the party's fortunes around; a tacit acknowledgement that they have come to terms with the grim realities of Lok Sabha 2004. They all know he'll garner a disproportionate share of sound bites and pixels, but does he carry even a residual magnetism associated with the surname to wean away a young electorate from the BJP? Beyond Amethi, partymen are non-committal.

Congress strategist Salman Khursheed quantifies Rahul's immediate impact on the party's prospects in two ways. One is obvious, that he will impart a more youthful sheen to the Congress in stark contrast to the hoary BJP (and goes without saying, the Congress old guard). The second is not that obvious: that he will galvanise the party rank and file. But, exults Youth Congress president Randeep Singh Surjewala: "This is Asia. Ideology by itself isn't enough. You must have a personification of that ideology. Rahul Congress ki vichardhaara ka jeeta-jagta prateek hai (Rahul is the personification of the Congress ideology)." The subtext is that he will dilute the foreign origin factor (which, of course, the Congress officially denies ever existed) at a time when the BJP's concerted campaign on it is finding a degree of acceptance in a civil society riven along sectoral and lobby lines.

The party's move to field Rahul by playing up the youth theme is also a subtle and canny attempt—by offering an alternative point of focus from the deeply polarising face of Sonia—to reclaim the universality of its appeal that it had lost ever since the post-Emergency collapse of the Congress consensus. The old empire, in short, dressed up in new concerns—that of the Indian youth. How much of it will work is, however, another question.

Younger Congressmen are chuffed that at least one of the two siblings is contesting. They never tire of pointing out that 54 per cent of the electorate is below 25 years of age and better able to identify with a Rahul Gandhi than an Advani. Sandeep Dikshit, the Congress probable from East Delhi, says, "Rahul's arrival is a symbol of the greening of the Congress. The torch is being passed to the next generation and the concerns of youth are upfront."

However, the general feeling is that Rahul's debut has come too late in the day to be effective this time—too late, that is, to wring out a credible political persona from the shrinking violet princeling. R.P. Singh, Congress candidate from Bulandshahr and a school buddy of Priyanka and Rahul, is one of those who says the decision should have come earlier. Adds he: "Priyanka should also make up her mind one way or the other." But he does concede that Rahul's advent will make it easier for every candidate in UP to win his seat.

AICC secretary R.P.N. Singh, a Congress hopeful from Padrauna in eastern UP, says he expects Rahul's candidature from Amethi to give the party that extra fillip in the state. Even before news of his impending baptism, internal surveys conducted by the Congress saw its voteshare crawl up from a low of 8 per cent in the assembly elections to 15 per cent in February this year. A follow-up survey earlier this month put it in the region of 18 per cent, not enough to win seats on its own but in a position to make its presence felt.Says R.P.N. Singh: "We're in the fight in as many 25 of the 80 seats in UP."

Off the record, Congressmen say Rahul may not have it in him to make a decisive impact in UP's fractured polity. "It just means we've one more sure seat in our kitty," quipped a party hand. "There may be a ripple effect but it isn't going to be significant beyond Sultanpur (the seat neighbouring Rae Bareli and Amethi)." Too little, too late just about sums up the party's take on Rahul's advent.

A snap poll conducted by C-Voter for Star TV in 20 Lok Sabha constituencies of UP, immediately following the announcement of Rahul's candidature, found that most voters believed his joining would benefit the party in the long run. He was perceived as young and energetic but inexperienced. Not surprisingly, most preferred Priyanka to Rahul.

Priyanka's adherents are legion. One of them even has a monthly magazine called World of Priyanka! For several months now, it had been clear that she was the one who would campaign, wooing voters as her elder brother is blooded in electoral politics. The compulsions of motherhood, the press was told, were stronger than the convictions of politics. The only surprise was that Rahul is contesting from Amethi, not Rae Bareli. "It means the Congress president has chosen the tougher seat," says Khursheed. But most see it as a sign that Sonia has made up her mind about the succession: Rahul is her first choice and only if he fails will Priyanka step in.

When he visited Amethi with Priyanka last month, she introduced him to assembled party workers thus: "He'll look after you now." In hindsight, it was a clear signal. Or was it? After all, it's Priyanka who has nurtured the constituency. Rahul could just as well have stood from Rae Bareli. Despite rumours about differences between Sonia and Priyanka on Rahul contesting the polls, there's nothing to prove this. The siblings are very close.

The bj's reaction to Rahul's candidature was predictable: dynasty had no place in a democracy even as it handed out tickets to Rajasthan CM Vasundhararaje's son Dushyant and Union finance minister Jaswant Singh's son Manvendra.

If Sonia's reliance on family has increased, it's clearly because her generals appear to be letting her down. Internecine warfare in the Congress has assumed violent proportions: last week, the police had to be called in to restrain party workers upset over ticket distribution in Tamil Nadu. They shouted slogans against cwc members Ahmed Patel and Kamal Nath. In fact, the entire pcc leadership walked out of the meeting chaired by Patel as they were miffed at having their suggestions ignored by him. The next day, infuriated by ticket distribution, the Andhra Pradesh cadre trashed cwc member Ghulam Nabi Azad's house.

The ongoing battle between the cwc's three minority leaders—Azad, Patel and Khursheed—is no secret. Patel and Khursheed have reportedly locked horns over the question of alliances in UP, with the former wooing the SP, the latter the bsp—both unsuccessfully! Will Rahul's entry put an end to the bickerings? Perhaps. Since he's a patient listener he might be able to pacify warring Congressmen better than his sister. That's a start.

Self-absorbed and introvertish, Rahul's low-profile intelligence may calm a strife-torn Congress
congress/opinion
Why Rahul's case is qualitatively more subversive than, say, Chautala's
Dipankar Gupta
 
Daily MailPublished
COLLAPSE COMMENTS :
HAVE YOUR SAY
Apr 01, 2004 12:00 AM
11
Dear Chortle

Let me congratulate you on your excellent choice of pseudonym. What India's idiotic politics and the capers of the "secuuuularrrgh" mob ought to produce in sane people is a rich, full-throated chortle.

To turn to a serious subject: the leggy Colombiana. Young Rahul deserves congratulations. At any rate he has a good eye and knew a good thing when he saw it. And let's admit it: which of our Indian leaders can boast of having good legs? Not one, alas! Not Manic Stinker (L)Aiyer, not Atalji or Advaniji. Not Uma Bharati, as far as I can tell. Or Sushma Swaraj. Hema Malini? Only in the past. Old Mahootma Gandhi's legs were notoriously bandy. Nehru Secuuularji always kept his hidden in tight pajamas, like the good Muslim he was. Shastriji? Nah!!! Indira? Nix....Morarji, V P Singh, Narasimha Rao, Deve Gowda? All washouts from the good legs point of view. Rajiv's were too fat. So that leaves us the Colombiana. When she becomes PM she will do India credit in the legs department at long last.
Rajendran Kumaran
London, UK
Apr 01, 2004 12:00 AM
10
Dear Rajender ji,

Excellent point! All that Congress needs to do is to use those legs in a proper manner. Haam sab gore legs ke deewane hain. But the only point is whether Rahul would accede to this plan or not.
chortle
., .
Apr 01, 2004 12:00 AM
9
Dear Chortle

How can you be sure that the Indian people won't prefer the Colombian's legs to Atalji's?
Rajendran Kumaran
London, UK
Apr 01, 2004 12:00 AM
8
I don't portend any real threat from this leggy Colombian girl as far as her becoming PM of India is concerned. Well, Colombia maybe notorious for drug mafias, but no way they are any match to the arm mafias from Italy. Apart from the mafias and interested businessmen, there is a strong pro-conversion Christian lobby that has been instrumental in Sonia's forward movement. This won't be the case in the civil war ravaged communist Colombia.
chortle
., .
Apr 01, 2004 12:00 AM
7
What is India in for next? Rahul has this Columbian girl friend with thunderous thighs. Is she in line for the Congress throne if Rahul were to go to his maker? Will she be enthroned as Congress leader and in due course called upon to be India's Prime Minister, with drooling courtiers like Pro-Nawab Mukherjee, Manic Stinker (L)Aiyer and K. Nutty Singh explaining that it's OK, the Columbian is a True Indian, ie, American Red Indian? And after the True Desi Red Indian has imposed a Columbian narco-mafia regime: will that still be Nehruvian Secularism in charge?

India will deserve it if this Italian adventuress Mrs Son-Why Can't-He imposes a dictatorship on the country. The Nutty Singhs and Manic Stinker (L)Aiyers and Sunil Call-Ninnies will be Seventh Heaven if she does that......

India got its Independence too cheap. Easy come, easy go.....
Rajendran Kumaran
London, UK
Apr 01, 2004 12:00 AM
6
Does it mean that no commoner however good he may be can head Congress? It is obvious that after or even with Sonia present, Rahul will be heading Congress. If the people vote Congress, it wil be Rahul who will become PM. Does it mean that this country of 1 billion does not have anyone who can be a better choice for PM job? And if Rahul goes out of picture someone from Colombia will try to occupy his position or Congress may then try the offsprings of Priyanka.Both Priyanka and Rahul are honest and intelligent persons,. Do they also feel that except for someone from that family, noone else in this country and the party is better than them to run this great country?
I.R.Sharma
Noida, India
Mar 29, 2004 12:00 AM
5
"If Sonia's reliance on family has increased, it's clearly because her generals appear to be letting her down". Yep continue to blame the foot soldiers for the inefficiency of the captaincy. Regarding Rahul Gandhi. Nobody seems clear about his qualifications per se which I guess is not a priority in politics. Incidentally he is not even a graduate. Apparently he did undertake a course on economics in harvard but didn't get his degree due to low grades. as usual congressmen are the least bothered about qulaificatiions when it comes to dynasty. Though one does wonder why a person born in privilege with the best of the facilities available at his disposal coudn't even complete his graduation.
Shine
xxxxxxxxxx, cccccccc
Mar 28, 2004 12:00 AM
4
[ Part -I ]
Rahul's entry into politics isn't going to make a little bit difference. May be it would have if it is 1990. Not now, not in future. At this time, all I can is that BJP is lesser evil among all the parties. That is what voting is all about, choosing the lesser evil in today's corrupted world. BJP believes in one, strong nation with a vision to make India an economic super power. During Congress rule, people never dared to dream about it, forget becoming one. I should say this is the single most achievement of the BJP govt. Some biased people have made much fun of Vajpayee's vision on highway projects, disinvestment and foreign policy but it is still a fact that India is building roads, ports at a much faster pace compared to what Congress did during it's 50 year rule. Coming to foreign policy, we managed to maintain friendship with Israel & PLO, manage excellent friendship with America while continuing to maintain our close friendship with Russia, form economic blocks with East Asian economies and central Asian economies. Our bilateral trade with China is growing at a rapid pace, estimated to reach multi-billion dollars in the next 5 years. All this is happening because we made one fundamental move i.e divert our attention from secularism, communalism, subsidies (which is a legacy of Congress) to economic development. The credit goes to BJP alone. It is true that India is not shining in many parts of the country but how can someone blame BJP which is in power for 5 years compared to Congress which was in power for 45 years. Let's not forget that Congress corrupted the system itself during this period and also, BJP did not have a full mandate on it's own during the 5 years rule. Is Congress blaming BJP for not fixing something in 5 yrs which it took care to destroy in 45 years? Many security experts even certified that Congress did not modernize our armed forces for a full 10 year period other than buying Bofors guns. How irresponsible is that ? Leaving the security of billion population at the mercy of rogue regimes in the neighborhood like China and Pakistan.
Miss Chandramukhi Sonkar
Rampur ( Uttar Pradesh ), India
Mar 28, 2004 12:00 AM
3
[ Part -II ]
Today, the modernization of armed forces is going at full throttle. I am sure even a hardcore Congress fellow cannot deny this. Coming to Congress and Rahul Gandhi, the important thing we need to ask ourselves is, why Congress? For what? For one more dose of socialism, secularism, subsidies, NAM, union strikes, 2 year waiting period for telephone line, corrupting whatever institutes that are left or may be legalizing corruption, dynasty rule, special status to NE states like J&K, milking PSUs, anti-Israel, anti-US policies and importing Mullahs from Bangladesh to NE states for votes and change the demography of border states. How about rapid economic development so that people don't have to fight for quotas and subsidies. What fears me most about the Congress is the excessive focus on secularism over other issues. Everyone knows that the debate over secularism is not something that can be won by any one group. It's a never ending debate and the best way to settle our differences is not to focus too much on our differences. Rather we should find issues that bind us together i.e economic development. Everyone wants house, water, roads, secure future for the family, clean environment, secure borders, peaceful and crime free society and the pride to be an Indian. That is what binds the common man. BJP can provide one, not Congress. Coming to Rahul Gandhi, it is utter rubbish to project him as a leader and one who can be identified with younger generation. Just because Rahul and Priyanka are younger doesn't mean they can be identified by younger generation. It's just a ploy by secular media to thrust these two kids into leadership position. A person becomes a leader by birth.
Miss Chandramukhi Sonkar
Rampur ( Uttar Pradesh ), India
Mar 28, 2004 12:00 AM
2
[ Part -III ]
The Problem comes when these two kids become more equal than others or they were thrust into leadership position. Millions of people have a problem with that. No politician's kid is given as much publicity as the Gandhi kids, with some newspapers even going to the ridiculous extent of printing the bio-data of Rahul Gandhi as a major new item. What did he exactly do this country to deserve so much attention? Even Congress fellows have no clue who is he. They just know that he is some well known Gandhi who will do something to provide justice to minorities or weaker sections. Why is Rahul Gandhi entering politics. Gandhi family wants to rule this nation as many years as they can. Their vehicle is the Congress. So, they throw some crumbs to other party leaders, letting them to bring their own kids into the party, use secularism as a weapon to divide people and continue their Raj. Rahul is pathetic. He is not even close to becoming eligible for MLA's post. There are millions of hardworking, educated people in this country who will make a better leader than Rahul. If Rahul wants to take the leadership role, I have only one suggestion for him. Stand in the line. Start from lower level positions, first as a party member serving in a district, then move the ladder step by step and show his worth as a leader before asking for votes to occupy top leadership position. The same holds for Priyanka. Even a dumb fellow like Bush served as party leader, governor for few years before contesting for President's job of a country which is much easier to govern compared to India. Leading this nation is a serious job and we need hardworking, serious people. Not some joker who spends most of the time outside the country, flirting with his Columbian girl friend and entering politics on and off as per his mood. After Rahul what next? His Columbian girlfriend will contest as PM and then their kids? I am sure there will be nut cases who will find even that proposition acceptable. These groups some how wants to win the secular debate and in the process, they don't care if the country is destroyed or not. By electing Sonia and Rahul, this is the message we are sending the world i.e we might be the smartest and most educated people in the world dominating IT, medical, research, education etc. but when it comes to electing one good leader out of billion population, our brains are empty.
Miss Chandramukhi Sonkar
Rampur ( Uttar Pradesh ), India
Mar 28, 2004 12:00 AM
1
good article !!
Miss Chandramukhi Sonkar
Rampur ( Uttar Pradesh ), India
COLLAPSE COMMENTS   
Post a Comment
You are not logged in, please log in or register
ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISING RATES | COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER | COMMENTS POLICY