THERE is little common ground between Bandit Queen and English, August. While one—stark, searing, sledgehammer-wielding—delves disconcertingly deep into the heart of darkness in rural Hindustan, the other, armed with a wickedly funny script and a quiver full of hard-edged one-liners, lays bare the chaos, confusion and corruption that prevails in small-town India. Even in terms of style and mood, the two films could well have come from two different planets: Shekhar Kapur's unblinking study of caste-gender hatred has no room for redemption; in Dev Benegal's maiden feature, which uses English as its principal language, whacky, irreverent humour is an escape chute.
The only link that hitherto bound the two films together was their steadfast defiance of Bollywood's narrative conventions. Now, there is another. Both films are being accorded high-profile all-India releases in December. Bandit Queen, made on a Rs 4-crore budget for UK's Channel Four, is being released all over India by Amitabh Bachchan Corporation Limited (ABCL), while English, August, a privately produced film for which the cast and crew agreed to accept deferred payments, has been acquired by the Rupert Murdoch-owned Twentieth Century Fox for theatrical distribution in at least 15 Indian cities.
But the question refuses to wither away: will the winter of 1995 really change the way 'offbeat' ventures like Bandit Queenand English, August are treated in Bollywood? Says Sunder Kimatrai, Fox's India representative: "There is definitely a market for a film like English, August. Otherwise, we wouldn't have taken up the film." Bobby Bedi, producer of Bandit Queen, agrees: "It is true that there were no mass audiences for such films in the past, but today things are different."
ABCL, too, is willing to believe that there is indeed an audience out there for meaningful cinema. Says a source: "Bombay wasn't a typical commercial product, yet it did exceedingly well at the box-office. There is no reason why Bandit Queen shouldn't."
Attitudes may be changing, but for obvious reasons neither Bandit Queen nor English, August are being positioned as art-house products. Says Kimatrai about Benegal's film: "We are targeting a mainstream, English-speaking urban audience." So is ABCL. But there is, at the same time, the realisation that such films cannot be for the mass market. Fox bosses are aware that people who flocked to see Speed may not be enthused to the same degree by English, August. But they are not unduly perturbed.
English, August, based on the Upamanyu Chatterjee novel, premieres in Bombay on November 25 before travelling to other parts of the country from the first week of December. There is one anxiety, though: unlike Bandit Queen, which has got the buzz "from Cannes to Kanpur", English, August, despite bagging awards at Nantes and Turin, is still a relatively unknown quantity. So test screenings have been organised in Bombay and elsewhere. "The response," according to Fox sources, "has been hearteningly encouraging."
This celluloid view of "the real India" through the bewildered eyes of an IAS rookie sent off to a small, smelly, scorching town in the backwaters of central India has much going for it. One, its language is English. Two, it is contemporaneous. Three, it is well-acted. And above all, it is laced with wit. Just the kind of film that college-going kids with an aversion to 'arthouse' products are likely to adore.
Bandit Queen, on the other hand, already has a large audience awaiting its arrival, thanks as much to the controversies it has raked as to the wide critical acclaim it has garnered. "And that," avers an ABCL source, "makes our task much easier. The initial draw is bound to be tremendous."
Yet, aggressive marketing will hold the key. Because both, English, August much more than Bandit Queen, are the sort of films that are normally relegated to limited-engagement morning shows in the metros. Fortunately, their backers have the muscle required to jostle for space in the market. While ABCL's ability to promote Bandit Queen, especially after their success with Bombay, can never be in doubt, the publicity exercise for English, August has already got going with highly visible promos on STAR Movies, a TV channel from the same stable as Twentieth Century Fox.
For Benegal, Fox's decision represents a major triumph for his kind of cinema, neither pulp fiction nor mere arthouse talking points. "This is the first time a film of this sort is being released across the country in this manner," he says. But will this winter of hope lead to a summer of joy in the back alleys of Bollywood? It will, but only if moviegoers vote with their feet.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT